   Compiling trading_engine v1.0.0 (/home/jgrusewski/Work/foxhunt/trading_engine)
   Compiling api_gateway v1.0.0 (/home/jgrusewski/Work/foxhunt/services/api_gateway)
warning: unused import: `std::collections::HashMap`
  --> services/api_gateway/src/routing/rate_limiter.rs:18:5
   |
18 | use std::collections::HashMap;
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: `#[warn(unused_imports)]` on by default

warning: type `HealthState` is more private than the item `backtesting_proxy::HealthChecker::get_state`
  --> services/api_gateway/src/grpc/backtesting_proxy.rs:93:5
   |
93 |     pub async fn get_state(&self) -> HealthState {
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ method `backtesting_proxy::HealthChecker::get_state` is reachable at visibility `pub`
   |
note: but type `HealthState` is only usable at visibility `pub(self)`
  --> services/api_gateway/src/grpc/backtesting_proxy.rs:32:1
   |
32 | enum HealthState {
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   = note: `#[warn(private_interfaces)]` on by default

warning: fields `issuer` and `audience` are never read
   --> services/api_gateway/src/auth/interceptor.rs:314:5
    |
308 | pub struct JwtService {
    |            ---------- fields in this struct
...
314 |     issuer: String,
    |     ^^^^^^
315 |     /// Expected audience
316 |     audience: String,
    |     ^^^^^^^^
    |
    = note: `#[warn(dead_code)]` on by default

warning: field `user_id` is never read
  --> services/api_gateway/src/config/authz.rs:36:5
   |
35 | struct UserPermissions {
   |        --------------- field in this struct
36 |     user_id: Uuid,
   |     ^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: `UserPermissions` has derived impls for the traits `Clone` and `Debug`, but these are intentionally ignored during dead code analysis

warning: fields `role_name`, `permissions`, and `loaded_at` are never read
  --> services/api_gateway/src/config/authz.rs:44:5
   |
43 | struct RolePermissions {
   |        --------------- fields in this struct
44 |     role_name: String,
   |     ^^^^^^^^^
45 |     permissions: HashSet<String>,
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^
46 |     loaded_at: Instant,
   |     ^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: `RolePermissions` has derived impls for the traits `Clone` and `Debug`, but these are intentionally ignored during dead code analysis

warning: fields `last_health_check` and `health_check_interval` are never read
  --> services/api_gateway/src/grpc/backtesting_proxy.rs:42:5
   |
39 | pub struct HealthChecker {
   |            ------------- fields in this struct
...
42 |     last_health_check: RwLock<Instant>,
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
43 |     failure_threshold: u32,
44 |     health_check_interval: Duration,
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

warning: method `has_tokens` is never used
  --> services/api_gateway/src/routing/rate_limiter.rs:53:8
   |
39 | impl TokenBucket {
   | ---------------- method in this implementation
...
53 |     fn has_tokens(&self) -> bool {
   |        ^^^^^^^^^^

warning: `api_gateway` (lib) generated 7 warnings (run `cargo fix --lib -p api_gateway` to apply 1 suggestion)
warning: unused variable: `auth_interceptor`
  --> services/api_gateway/src/main.rs:93:9
   |
93 |     let auth_interceptor = AuthInterceptor::new(
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: if this is intentional, prefix it with an underscore: `_auth_interceptor`
   |
   = note: `#[warn(unused_variables)]` on by default

warning: `api_gateway` (lib) generated 7 warnings (7 duplicates)
warning: `api_gateway` (bin "api_gateway") generated 1 warning
    Finished `bench` profile [optimized] target(s) in 1m 37s
     Running benches/revocation_cache_perf.rs (/home/jgrusewski/Work/foxhunt/target/release/deps/revocation_cache_perf-7fb5cc7facfa2253)
Benchmarking revocation_cache_hit
Benchmarking revocation_cache_hit: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking revocation_cache_hit: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0001 s (58M iterations)
Benchmarking revocation_cache_hit: Analyzing
revocation_cache_hit    time:   [85.363 ns 86.243 ns 87.220 ns]
Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
  2 (2.00%) high severe

Benchmarking revocation_cache_miss_with_redis
Benchmarking revocation_cache_miss_with_redis: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking revocation_cache_miss_with_redis: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.6785 s (20k iterations)
Benchmarking revocation_cache_miss_with_redis: Analyzing
revocation_cache_miss_with_redis
                        time:   [175.98 ns 180.01 ns 184.43 ns]
Found 10 outliers among 100 measurements (10.00%)
  3 (3.00%) high mild
  7 (7.00%) high severe

Benchmarking hot_token_pattern_95pct_hits
Benchmarking hot_token_pattern_95pct_hits: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking hot_token_pattern_95pct_hits: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0005 s (54M iterations)
Benchmarking hot_token_pattern_95pct_hits: Analyzing
hot_token_pattern_95pct_hits
                        time:   [90.339 ns 91.820 ns 93.566 ns]
Found 9 outliers among 100 measurements (9.00%)
  5 (5.00%) high mild
  4 (4.00%) high severe


Hot token pattern stats: 87448030 hits, 11 misses, 100.00% hit rate
Benchmarking ttl_expiration/1ms_ttl
Benchmarking ttl_expiration/1ms_ttl: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking ttl_expiration/1ms_ttl: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0003 s (58M iterations)
Benchmarking ttl_expiration/1ms_ttl: Analyzing
ttl_expiration/1ms_ttl  time:   [87.694 ns 88.848 ns 90.441 ns]
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
  2 (2.00%) high mild
  1 (1.00%) high severe
Benchmarking ttl_expiration/60s_ttl
Benchmarking ttl_expiration/60s_ttl: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking ttl_expiration/60s_ttl: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0001 s (55M iterations)
Benchmarking ttl_expiration/60s_ttl: Analyzing
ttl_expiration/60s_ttl  time:   [89.642 ns 90.949 ns 92.864 ns]
Found 11 outliers among 100 measurements (11.00%)
  1 (1.00%) low mild
  9 (9.00%) high mild
  1 (1.00%) high severe

Benchmarking cache_size_impact/lookup/100
Benchmarking cache_size_impact/lookup/100: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking cache_size_impact/lookup/100: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0004 s (55M iterations)
Benchmarking cache_size_impact/lookup/100: Analyzing
cache_size_impact/lookup/100
                        time:   [87.281 ns 88.163 ns 89.148 ns]
Found 6 outliers among 100 measurements (6.00%)
  5 (5.00%) high mild
  1 (1.00%) high severe
Benchmarking cache_size_impact/lookup/1000
Benchmarking cache_size_impact/lookup/1000: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking cache_size_impact/lookup/1000: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0003 s (53M iterations)
Benchmarking cache_size_impact/lookup/1000: Analyzing
cache_size_impact/lookup/1000
                        time:   [91.218 ns 92.550 ns 94.154 ns]
Found 11 outliers among 100 measurements (11.00%)
  2 (2.00%) low mild
  2 (2.00%) high mild
  7 (7.00%) high severe
Benchmarking cache_size_impact/lookup/10000
Benchmarking cache_size_impact/lookup/10000: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking cache_size_impact/lookup/10000: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0003 s (55M iterations)
Benchmarking cache_size_impact/lookup/10000: Analyzing
cache_size_impact/lookup/10000
                        time:   [85.758 ns 87.278 ns 89.084 ns]
Found 8 outliers among 100 measurements (8.00%)
  5 (5.00%) high mild
  3 (3.00%) high severe
Benchmarking cache_size_impact/lookup/100000
Benchmarking cache_size_impact/lookup/100000: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking cache_size_impact/lookup/100000: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0002 s (49M iterations)
Benchmarking cache_size_impact/lookup/100000: Analyzing
cache_size_impact/lookup/100000
                        time:   [93.926 ns 94.785 ns 95.830 ns]
Found 4 outliers among 100 measurements (4.00%)
  2 (2.00%) high mild
  2 (2.00%) high severe

Benchmarking concurrent_cache_access
Benchmarking concurrent_cache_access: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking concurrent_cache_access: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0001 s (47M iterations)
Benchmarking concurrent_cache_access: Analyzing
concurrent_cache_access time:   [97.408 ns 99.299 ns 101.48 ns]
Found 17 outliers among 100 measurements (17.00%)
  10 (10.00%) low mild
  5 (5.00%) high mild
  2 (2.00%) high severe

Benchmarking mixed_revocation_pattern
Benchmarking mixed_revocation_pattern: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking mixed_revocation_pattern: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0004 s (47M iterations)
Benchmarking mixed_revocation_pattern: Analyzing
mixed_revocation_pattern
                        time:   [102.40 ns 103.82 ns 105.44 ns]
Found 10 outliers among 100 measurements (10.00%)
  2 (2.00%) high mild
  8 (8.00%) high severe

Benchmarking cache_vs_no_cache/no_cache_direct_redis
Benchmarking cache_vs_no_cache/no_cache_direct_redis: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking cache_vs_no_cache/no_cache_direct_redis: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.7476 s (10k iterations)
Benchmarking cache_vs_no_cache/no_cache_direct_redis: Analyzing
cache_vs_no_cache/no_cache_direct_redis
                        time:   [570.19 µs 578.86 µs 590.35 µs]
Found 9 outliers among 100 measurements (9.00%)
  2 (2.00%) high mild
  7 (7.00%) high severe
Benchmarking cache_vs_no_cache/with_cache_95pct_hits
Benchmarking cache_vs_no_cache/with_cache_95pct_hits: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking cache_vs_no_cache/with_cache_95pct_hits: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0009 s (22M iterations)
Benchmarking cache_vs_no_cache/with_cache_95pct_hits: Analyzing
cache_vs_no_cache/with_cache_95pct_hits
                        time:   [203.51 ns 214.28 ns 226.45 ns]
Found 17 outliers among 100 measurements (17.00%)
  1 (1.00%) high mild
  16 (16.00%) high severe

Benchmarking cache_entry_insertion
Benchmarking cache_entry_insertion: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking cache_entry_insertion: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0004 s (6.3M iterations)
Benchmarking cache_entry_insertion: Analyzing
cache_entry_insertion   time:   [702.73 ns 767.77 ns 838.63 ns]
Found 15 outliers among 100 measurements (15.00%)
  3 (3.00%) high mild
  12 (12.00%) high severe

Benchmarking production_workload_simulation
Benchmarking production_workload_simulation: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Benchmarking production_workload_simulation: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0324 s (323k iterations)
Benchmarking production_workload_simulation: Analyzing
production_workload_simulation
                        time:   [452.51 ns 514.73 ns 579.77 ns]
Found 12 outliers among 100 measurements (12.00%)
  9 (9.00%) high mild
  3 (3.00%) high severe


Production workload stats: 578790 hits, 7553 misses, 98.71% hit rate
