Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
jgrusewski
ea1d8703b7 spec(perf): revise K-loop parallelization design — full critical pass
Revises all 12 issues from the self-review pass:

1. (HIGH) Soften bit-equivalence claim — single-sample helper and
   batched kernel at B=1 are different CUDA kernels; FP order may
   differ. Acceptance is relative_eq ≤ 1e-6, not bit-exact.
2. (HIGH) Explicit asymmetry: only cfc_step has a single-sample GPU
   oracle. GRN/VSN/attn bwd rely on smoke + chain-rule preservation.
   feedback_no_cpu_test_fallbacks.md forbids a CPU reference oracle.
3. (HIGH) Realistic targets — 3× floor, 5× stretch. Drops 15× claim
   which was Amdahl-bounded under any reasonable assumption.
4. (MED) AdamW-after-reducer invariant stated explicitly: final grad
   buffer is OVERWRITE by reducer, meaningful only after reducer ran.
5. (MED) New B=32 smoke test (stacked_trainer_loss_shrinks_at_batch_32)
   actually exercises the cross-batch reduction path; existing
   perception_overfit suite is all B=1.
6. (MED) Rollout commit 1 bundles reduce_axis0 + first consumer
   (cfc_step refactor) to avoid feedback_wire_everything_up.md
   orphan-kernel anti-pattern.
7. (LOW) Drop "merge to ml-alpha-phase-a" — user already chose direct
   commits to that branch; clarify in Rollout.
8. (LOW) Add explicit scratch-sizing formula:
        scratch_bytes ≈ B × Σ(param tensor sizes per kernel).
9. (LOW) Remove resolved open question (memset_zeros ordering).
10. (STRUCT) Post-refactor bottleneck analysis section — names the
    next L40S floor (Mamba2 scan, launch latency, cuBLAS).
11. (STRUCT) cudaFuncSetAttribute note — refactored cfc_bwd's per-
    block shared mem drops to 1 KiB; no attribute change needed.
12. (STRUCT) Explicit Rollback section — atomic-commit-per-kernel +
    revert strategy; rollback baseline is the spec commit
    (54aa69c10) on ml-alpha-phase-a.

Plus locks the target pool to L40S — speedup must be attributable to
the refactor, not to a hardware bump. H100 / BF16 / larger batch
become candidates for a follow-up spec once the L40S floor is known.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-17 23:13:32 +02:00
jgrusewski
54aa69c108 spec(perf): K-loop block-per-batch parallelization design
Documents the design for fixing the single-SM bottleneck in five
backward/K-loop kernels: cfc_step (fwd+bwd), GRN bwd, VSN bwd, and
attention_pool bwd. All currently use grid=(1,1,1) with an internal
n_batch loop — on L40S (142 SMs) with B=32 this puts <1% of the GPU
to work in the K-loop critical path.

Architecture: block-per-batch (grid=(B,1,1)) for the kernel body, plus
per-batch grad scratch buffers reduced via a single parameterised
reduce_axis0 kernel (block tree-reduce, no atomicAdd per
feedback_no_atomicadd.md). Same pattern as the existing LayerNorm bwd
reducer — CUDA-Graph-safe, debuggable, and consistent with foxhunt's
no-cooperative-groups discipline.

Target: ≥3× epoch wall speedup (stretch 8-15×). Makes 3-fold CV
tractable (10.5h → 2-3h) and unblocks decision-stride / state-dim
sweeps that compound the gain.

Acceptance gates: (a) all 8 perception_overfit smokes still converge,
(b) new B=1 bit-equivalence test asserts the refactored batched bwd
kernel at B=1 matches the existing single-sample helper byte-for-byte,
(c) cluster A/B vs t6z89 baseline shows AUC trajectory within ±0.005
and epoch wall ≥3× faster.

Atomic refactor per kernel — one commit per kernel covering the
kernel rewrite, scratch buffer alloc, reducer launch wiring, and
smoke. No "_legacy" parallel kernels per feedback_no_legacy_aliases.md
+ feedback_no_partial_refactor.md.

Open implementation-plan decisions: exact memset_zeros ordering inside
the captured graph, batch-vs-per-tensor reducer launches, optimal
block_dim for reduce_axis0 itself.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-17 23:06:28 +02:00