//! PPO Hyperopt Validation Split Tests //! //! This test suite verifies that the PPO hyperparameter optimization adapter //! properly splits data into training and validation sets, preventing overfitting. //! //! Critical Requirements: //! 1. Train/val split must be implemented (80/20) //! 2. Training must ONLY use train trajectories //! 3. Validation loss must be computed on held-out val trajectories //! 4. Optimization metric must be val_loss (not train_loss) //! 5. Train and val losses should differ (proves separation) use ml::hyperopt::adapters::ppo::{PPOParams, PPOTrainer}; use ml::hyperopt::traits::HyperparameterOptimizable; #[test] fn test_ppo_train_val_separation() { // Test that training and validation losses are different, // proving that we have separate train/val sets let mut trainer = PPOTrainer::new(100).expect("Failed to create PPO trainer"); let params = PPOParams::default(); let metrics = trainer.train_with_params(params).expect("Training failed"); // Verify both train and val metrics exist assert!( metrics.policy_loss.is_finite(), "Training policy loss should be finite" ); assert!( metrics.value_loss.is_finite(), "Training value loss should be finite" ); assert!( metrics.val_policy_loss.is_finite(), "Validation policy loss should be finite" ); assert!( metrics.val_value_loss.is_finite(), "Validation value loss should be finite" ); // Train and val losses should differ (proves separation) // With 80/20 split, train loss is computed on 80 trajectories, // val loss on 20 trajectories - they will be different let policy_diff = (metrics.policy_loss - metrics.val_policy_loss).abs(); let value_diff = (metrics.value_loss - metrics.val_value_loss).abs(); println!("Train policy loss: {:.6}", metrics.policy_loss); println!("Val policy loss: {:.6}", metrics.val_policy_loss); println!("Policy loss difference: {:.6}", policy_diff); println!("Train value loss: {:.6}", metrics.value_loss); println!("Val value loss: {:.6}", metrics.val_value_loss); println!("Value loss difference: {:.6}", value_diff); // Losses should be different (not identical) due to different data // Allow small differences in case of numerical coincidence assert!( policy_diff > 1e-6 || value_diff > 1e-6, "Train and val losses are identical - no separation! \ policy_diff={:.6}, value_diff={:.6}", policy_diff, value_diff ); } #[test] fn test_ppo_insufficient_trajectories() { // Test that training fails gracefully with too few trajectories // for 80/20 split (minimum 10 required) let mut trainer = PPOTrainer::new(5).expect("Failed to create PPO trainer"); let params = PPOParams::default(); let result = trainer.train_with_params(params); assert!( result.is_err(), "Training should fail with insufficient trajectories" ); let error = result.unwrap_err(); let error_msg = format!("{:?}", error); assert!( error_msg.contains("Insufficient trajectories") || error_msg.contains("train/val split"), "Error should mention insufficient trajectories, got: {}", error_msg ); } #[test] fn test_ppo_edge_case_trajectories() { // Test edge case: exactly 10 trajectories (minimum) // 80/20 split: 8 train, 2 val let mut trainer = PPOTrainer::new(10).expect("Failed to create PPO trainer"); let params = PPOParams::default(); let result = trainer.train_with_params(params); // Should succeed (10 trajectories is minimum) assert!( result.is_ok(), "Training should succeed with 10 trajectories (minimum)" ); let metrics = result.unwrap(); assert!(metrics.val_policy_loss.is_finite()); assert!(metrics.val_value_loss.is_finite()); } #[test] fn test_ppo_optimization_uses_val_loss() { // Test that extract_objective returns validation loss, not training loss let mut trainer = PPOTrainer::new(100).expect("Failed to create PPO trainer"); let params = PPOParams::default(); let metrics = trainer.train_with_params(params).expect("Training failed"); // Get optimization objective let objective = PPOTrainer::extract_objective(&metrics); // Objective should be based on validation losses // extract_objective returns val_policy_loss + val_value_loss let expected_objective = metrics.val_policy_loss + metrics.val_value_loss; println!("Optimization objective: {:.6}", objective); println!("Expected (val losses): {:.6}", expected_objective); println!( "Train losses sum: {:.6}", metrics.policy_loss + metrics.value_loss ); // Verify objective matches validation losses assert!( (objective - expected_objective).abs() < 1e-6, "Optimization objective should be based on validation losses, not training. \ Got {:.6}, expected {:.6}", objective, expected_objective ); // Verify objective is NOT equal to training losses let train_objective = metrics.policy_loss + metrics.value_loss; assert!( (objective - train_objective).abs() > 1e-6, "Optimization objective should NOT be based on training losses. \ Objective={:.6}, train_sum={:.6}", objective, train_objective ); } #[test] fn test_ppo_val_loss_metrics_exist() { // Verify that PPOMetrics struct has val_policy_loss and val_value_loss fields let mut trainer = PPOTrainer::new(100).expect("Failed to create PPO trainer"); let params = PPOParams::default(); let metrics = trainer.train_with_params(params).expect("Training failed"); // Access fields to verify they exist (compile-time check) let _policy = metrics.policy_loss; let _value = metrics.value_loss; let _val_policy = metrics.val_policy_loss; let _val_value = metrics.val_value_loss; let _combined = metrics.combined_loss; let _reward = metrics.avg_episode_reward; let _episodes = metrics.episodes_completed; println!("All required metrics fields exist:"); println!(" policy_loss: {:.6}", metrics.policy_loss); println!(" value_loss: {:.6}", metrics.value_loss); println!(" val_policy_loss: {:.6}", metrics.val_policy_loss); println!(" val_value_loss: {:.6}", metrics.val_value_loss); } #[test] fn test_ppo_small_val_set_warning() { // Test that training succeeds but may warn with small validation set // 12 trajectories: 9 train, 3 val (below 5 val threshold) let mut trainer = PPOTrainer::new(12).expect("Failed to create PPO trainer"); let params = PPOParams::default(); let result = trainer.train_with_params(params); // Should succeed (validation set exists, even if small) assert!( result.is_ok(), "Training should succeed with small validation set" ); let metrics = result.unwrap(); assert!(metrics.val_policy_loss.is_finite()); assert!(metrics.val_value_loss.is_finite()); } #[test] fn test_ppo_hyperopt_prevents_overfitting() { // Integration test: Verify that using validation loss for optimization // prevents selecting overfitted hyperparameters let mut trainer = PPOTrainer::new(100).expect("Failed to create PPO trainer"); // Test with two different parameter sets let params1 = PPOParams { policy_learning_rate: 1e-4, value_learning_rate: 3e-4, clip_epsilon: 0.2, value_loss_coeff: 1.0, entropy_coeff: 0.01, }; let params2 = PPOParams { policy_learning_rate: 5e-5, value_learning_rate: 1e-4, clip_epsilon: 0.25, value_loss_coeff: 0.8, entropy_coeff: 0.05, }; let metrics1 = trainer .train_with_params(params1.clone()) .expect("Training 1 failed"); let metrics2 = trainer .train_with_params(params2.clone()) .expect("Training 2 failed"); let obj1 = PPOTrainer::extract_objective(&metrics1); let obj2 = PPOTrainer::extract_objective(&metrics2); println!("\nParams 1:"); println!( " Train loss: {:.6}", metrics1.policy_loss + metrics1.value_loss ); println!(" Val loss: {:.6}", obj1); println!("\nParams 2:"); println!( " Train loss: {:.6}", metrics2.policy_loss + metrics2.value_loss ); println!(" Val loss: {:.6}", obj2); // Both should produce valid validation losses assert!(obj1.is_finite() && obj2.is_finite()); // Verify objectives are based on validation, not training let train_obj1 = metrics1.policy_loss + metrics1.value_loss; let train_obj2 = metrics2.policy_loss + metrics2.value_loss; assert!( (obj1 - train_obj1).abs() > 1e-6 || (obj2 - train_obj2).abs() > 1e-6, "At least one objective should differ from training loss" ); }