Files
foxhunt/crates/ml/tests/debug_position_delta_test.rs
jgrusewski 448b61d095 refactor: collapse 9-level to 7-level ExposureLevel — eliminate degenerate Flat variants
The 4-branch DQN (direction x magnitude) had 3 degenerate variants
(Short25, Flat, Long25) that all mapped to 0.0 target exposure when
direction=Flat, causing 82% Flat collapse. Collapse these into a
single Flat variant, giving 7 levels (ShortSmall/Half/Full, Flat,
LongSmall/Half/Full) and 63 total factored actions (7x3x3).

- ExposureLevel enum: 9 variants -> 7 (add direction/magnitude/from_dir_mag)
- FactoredAction: 81 -> 63 total actions, from_index/to_index updated
- DQN epsilon-greedy: use from_dir_mag() instead of dir*3+mag indexing
- DQN config: num_actions default 9 -> 7
- PPO action space: 45 -> 63 actions, action masking updated
- Signal adapter CUDA kernel: 5-bin -> 7-bin exposure aggregation
- All tests updated for new variant names and index ranges

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-11 11:54:09 +02:00

202 lines
6.9 KiB
Rust

#![allow(
clippy::assertions_on_constants,
clippy::assertions_on_result_states,
clippy::clone_on_copy,
clippy::decimal_literal_representation,
clippy::doc_markdown,
clippy::empty_line_after_doc_comments,
clippy::field_reassign_with_default,
clippy::get_unwrap,
clippy::identity_op,
clippy::inconsistent_digit_grouping,
clippy::indexing_slicing,
clippy::integer_division,
clippy::len_zero,
clippy::let_underscore_must_use,
clippy::manual_div_ceil,
clippy::manual_let_else,
clippy::manual_range_contains,
clippy::modulo_arithmetic,
clippy::needless_range_loop,
clippy::non_ascii_literal,
clippy::redundant_clone,
clippy::shadow_reuse,
clippy::shadow_same,
clippy::shadow_unrelated,
clippy::single_match_else,
clippy::str_to_string,
clippy::string_slice,
clippy::tests_outside_test_module,
clippy::too_many_lines,
clippy::unnecessary_wraps,
clippy::unseparated_literal_suffix,
clippy::use_debug,
clippy::useless_vec,
clippy::wildcard_enum_match_arm,
clippy::else_if_without_else,
clippy::expect_used,
clippy::missing_const_for_fn,
clippy::similar_names,
clippy::type_complexity,
clippy::collapsible_else_if,
clippy::doc_lazy_continuation,
clippy::items_after_test_module,
clippy::map_clone,
clippy::multiple_unsafe_ops_per_block,
clippy::unwrap_or_default,
clippy::assign_op_pattern,
clippy::needless_borrow,
clippy::println_empty_string,
clippy::unnecessary_cast,
clippy::used_underscore_binding,
clippy::create_dir,
clippy::implicit_saturating_sub,
clippy::exit,
clippy::expect_fun_call,
clippy::too_many_arguments,
clippy::unnecessary_map_or,
clippy::unwrap_used,
dead_code,
unused_imports,
unused_variables,
clippy::cloned_ref_to_slice_refs,
clippy::neg_multiply,
clippy::while_let_loop,
clippy::bool_assert_comparison,
clippy::excessive_precision,
clippy::trivially_copy_pass_by_ref,
clippy::op_ref,
clippy::redundant_closure,
clippy::unnecessary_lazy_evaluations,
clippy::if_then_some_else_none,
clippy::unnecessary_to_owned,
clippy::single_component_path_imports,
)]
//! Debug test to trace position_delta sign logic
//!
//! This test verifies whether position_delta is positive or negative
//! when going from FLAT to LONG.
#![allow(unused_crate_dependencies)]
use ml::dqn::action_space::{ExposureLevel, FactoredAction, OrderType, Urgency};
use ml::dqn::portfolio_tracker::PortfolioTracker;
use tracing::info;
#[test]
fn test_position_delta_sign_when_buying() {
let mut tracker = PortfolioTracker::new(100_000.0, 0.0001, 1.0);
// Trace internal state
info!(cash = tracker.cash_balance(), position = tracker.current_position(), "INITIAL STATE");
// Execute: Go from FLAT (0) to LONG (1.0 contract)
let action = FactoredAction::new(
ExposureLevel::LongFull, // target_exposure = +1.0
OrderType::Market,
Urgency::Normal
);
info!("EXECUTING ACTION: Long100 (target_exposure = +1.0), Price: $5,600.00, max_position: 1.0");
// Execute the action
tracker.execute_action(action, 5600.0, 1.0);
info!(
cash = tracker.cash_balance(),
position = tracker.current_position(),
portfolio_value = tracker.total_value(5600.0),
"AFTER EXECUTION"
);
// Manually calculate what position_delta should have been
let target_exposure: f32 = 1.0; // Long100
let max_position: f32 = 1.0;
let target_position: f32 = target_exposure * max_position; // 1.0
let clamped_position: f32 = target_position.clamp(-1.0, 1.0); // 1.0
let initial_position: f32 = 0.0;
let position_delta: f32 = clamped_position - initial_position; // 1.0 - 0.0 = +1.0
info!(
target_position,
clamped_position,
initial_position,
position_delta,
"MANUAL CALCULATION (position_delta should be POSITIVE for buying)"
);
// Expected behavior:
// - position_delta = +1.0 (POSITIVE when buying/going long)
// - Line 268 checks `if position_delta < 0.0` → FALSE
// - Cash check BYPASSED for buying!
if position_delta < 0.0 {
info!("SIGN LOGIC: position_delta < 0.0 — Cash check would RUN (but this is a BUY!)");
} else {
info!("SIGN LOGIC: position_delta >= 0.0 — Cash check BYPASSED (THIS IS THE BUG!)");
}
// Expected cash after buying 1 contract at $5,600:
// cash = 100,000 + (+1.0 * 5,600) - transaction_cost
// But V6 formula says: cash += position_delta * price - cost
// = 100,000 + (1.0 * 5,600) - cost = 105,600 - cost (ADDS cash when buying!)
let expected_cash = 100_000.0 - (1.0 * 5600.0) - (1.0 * 5600.0 * 0.0015);
info!(expected_cash, actual_cash = tracker.cash_balance(), "EXPECTED VS ACTUAL cash");
// The bug: position_delta is POSITIVE when buying, so:
// 1. Line 268 check fails (position_delta < 0.0 → false)
// 2. Cash check bypassed
// 3. Line 310: cash += position_delta * price - cost
// = 100,000 + (+1.0 * 5,600) - 8.4 = 105,591.60 (ADDS cash!)
if tracker.cash_balance() > 100_000.0 {
info!("BUG CONFIRMED: Cash INCREASED when buying (should decrease)");
} else {
info!("Cash correctly decreased when buying");
}
}
#[test]
fn test_position_delta_sign_when_selling() {
let mut tracker = PortfolioTracker::new(100_000.0, 0.0001, 1.0);
info!("TEST 2: GOING SHORT — Initial: FLAT (0 contracts) to Short100 (-1.0 contracts)");
let action = FactoredAction::new(
ExposureLevel::ShortFull, // target_exposure = -1.0
OrderType::Market,
Urgency::Normal
);
tracker.execute_action(action, 5600.0, 1.0);
// Calculate position_delta
let target_exposure: f32 = -1.0; // Short100
let target_position: f32 = target_exposure * 1.0; // -1.0
let clamped_position: f32 = target_position.clamp(-1.0, 1.0); // -1.0
let position_delta: f32 = clamped_position - 0.0; // -1.0 - 0.0 = -1.0
info!(position_delta, "position_delta (NEGATIVE for selling/going short)");
if position_delta < 0.0 {
info!("position_delta < 0.0: Cash check would RUN (but this is a SELL, not a BUY!)");
} else {
info!("position_delta >= 0.0: Cash check BYPASSED");
}
// Expected cash after shorting 1 contract at $5,600:
// Should GAIN $5,600 minus transaction cost
let expected_cash = 100_000.0 + (1.0 * 5600.0) - (1.0 * 5600.0 * 0.0015);
info!(expected_cash, actual_cash = tracker.cash_balance(), "Expected vs actual cash");
// Line 310: cash += position_delta * price - cost
// = 100,000 + (-1.0 * 5,600) - 8.4 = 94,391.60 (SUBTRACTS cash!)
if tracker.cash_balance() < 100_000.0 {
info!("BUG CONFIRMED: Cash DECREASED when selling short (should increase)");
} else {
info!("Cash correctly increased when selling short");
}
}