Files
foxhunt/crates/ml-alpha
jgrusewski 27feb94a49 feat(rl): R4 — GPU-resident action sampling kernels
Closes defect #5 prerequisites for the GPU-pure step_with_lobsim that
lands in R6. Replaces the host Thompson + host argmax + host
log-softmax loops the flawed Phase F shipped in step_with_lobsim
(which violated feedback_cpu_is_read_only with 5 DtoH copies + host
per-action loops + HtoD action upload per training step).

Three new kernels:

1. rl_action_kernel.cu — Thompson sampler over the C51 atom
   distribution. One block per batch, N_ACTIONS=9 threads. Each thread
   softmaxes its action's Q_N_ATOMS=21 atoms, samples one atom via CDF
   walk, writes sampled return to shared mem. Thread 0 argmaxes over
   per-action sampled returns + writes actions[b] + advances per-batch
   PRNG state.

   PRNG: per-batch xorshift32 state in prng_state_d (allocated +
   host-seeded from cfg.dqn_seed via ChaCha8 at trainer init per
   pearl_scoped_init_seed_for_reproducibility, with .max(1) guard
   since xorshift32 freezes at 0). Each per-action thread XORs its
   action index (golden-ratio mixed) into a thread-local copy of the
   per-batch state — no inter-thread race, reproducible by
   (cfg.dqn_seed, b_size, step_count). No cuRAND dep.

2. argmax_expected_q.cu — Bellman-target argmax over expected Q per
   action. Same layout as rl_action_kernel but deterministic (no
   PRNG). Per pearl_thompson_for_distributional_action_selection:
   Thompson for rollout (rl_action_kernel), argmax for Bellman target
   (this kernel) — distinct kernels, distinct ISV consumers.

3. log_pi_at_action.cu — per-batch log π(actions[b] | s_b) via
   log-softmax + lookup. One thread per batch entry (N_ACTIONS=9 is
   small enough for a per-thread sequential loop). Feeds the PPO
   importance ratio in R6.

IntegratedTrainer gains:
- 3 cubin includes (rl_action_kernel, argmax_expected_q, log_pi_at_action)
- 3 module/function field pairs
- 2 new device buffers populated at init:
    prng_state_d: CudaSlice<u32> of length n_batch
    atom_supports_d: CudaSlice<f32> of length Q_N_ATOMS=21,
      values [Q_V_MIN, Q_V_MIN + step, …, Q_V_MAX] = linspace(-1, +1, 21)
- 3 launcher methods:
    launch_rl_action_kernel(q_logits_d, actions_d, b_size)
    launch_argmax_expected_q(q_logits_d, next_actions_d, b_size)
    launch_log_pi_at_action(pi_logits_d, actions_d, log_pi_out_d, b_size)

GPU-oracle tests in tests/r4_action_kernels.rs (per
feedback_no_cpu_test_fallbacks every oracle is analytical, not a CPU
reference):

  R4.1: Thompson under sharp distribution (action 5 has logit=20 on
        atom 20 / support +1.0; others have logit=20 on atom 0 /
        support −1.0) collapses to argmax — per-action dominant-atom
        probability ≈ 1 − 4e-8, so 100/100 trials should pick action
        5. Assert ≥99/100 (tolerates one fp-rounding edge near
        u ≈ 1.0 in CDF walk).
  R4.2: argmax_expected_q picks the rewarded action under the same
        sharp distribution. Negative invariant: swap dominant atom to
        action 2 → next_action follows.
  R4.3: log_pi_at_action with π logits dominant at action 3 (logit=20,
        others=0) → log π(3) ≈ 0 within 1e-4. Negative invariant: log
        π(other action) ≈ −20 within 1e-3.

Build cache-bust v27.

cargo check + cargo build --tests on ml-alpha green (heads_bit_equiv
pre-existing failure persists).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-23 10:04:58 +02:00
..