2af8e02fd8
Phase E.3 Task 23. Trains the Phase E execution-policy DQN on the first
80% of fxcache snapshots, then evaluates the frozen policy (ε=0) on the
held-out 20% across a transaction-cost sweep. Compares absolute Sharpe
vs the Phase 1d.4 always-market-when-confident baseline.
Pipeline pieces:
- Shared loaders extracted into crates/ml/src/env/loaders.rs (used by
both alpha_dqn_h600_smoke and alpha_compose_backtest)
- alpha_compose_backtest.rs: train DQN on first n_train bars, then
frozen-eval n_eval episodes per cost level
- cost grid: [0.0, 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5] (price units per
contract round-turn)
- Annualised Sharpe via per-episode Sharpe × sqrt(episodes/year)
where episodes/year ≈ 252 · 6.5h · 3600s / (horizon · 12s)
Run (horizon=600, 1000 train ep, 500 eval ep/cost, 1.5M snapshots):
cost n_ep mean_R std_R Sharpe/ep Sharpe_ann win_rate
0.0000 500 -11.09 8.03 -1.380 -39.50 0.090
0.0625 500 -20.68 9.88 -2.093 -59.89 0.012
0.1250 500 -29.38 9.49 -3.095 -88.58 0.000
0.2500 500 -48.23 11.90 -4.052 -115.98 0.000
0.5000 500 -84.59 17.43 -4.854 -138.92 0.000
Phase 1d.4 baseline for comparison: +4.4 ann. at cost=0, -4.0 at half-tick.
The Phase E policy LOSES MONEY across the whole cost grid — even at
frictionless cost=0. This is not a contradiction with the H=600 PASS
verdict (rvr=+1.04σ): the smoke's rvr is RELATIVE TO RANDOM, while
backtest Sharpe is ABSOLUTE. "Better than random by 1 std" is still
losing if random loses big.
The diagnostic that the E.2 controller already surfaced:
ISV[543] STACKER_THRESHOLD saturated at upper clamp (0.5) — policy
trades 85% of the time vs the 8% target. Over-trading pays spread on
every bar regardless of alpha confidence. Even with perfect alpha
(Phase 1d.3 AUC=0.673), trading 85% × spread cost > alpha edge.
The Phase 1d.4 baseline beats us at cost=0 because it WAITS unless
|stacker_logit| > threshold — the threshold gate filters bars with
weak alpha signal. The Phase E controller PRODUCES slot 543 but the
DQN's action selection doesn't CONSUME it.
This is exactly what the E.3 backtest is FOR: revealing that the
Phase E.1/E.2 producer-side architecture without consumer-side gating
is incomplete. The composition backtest validates the architecture's
weak link.
NEXT (E.3 task 24-28 or a side fix): wire slot 543 consumption into
the action selection. At each step:
if |ISV[543] − 0.5| > |stacker_logit − 0.5|:
action = Wait // confidence below threshold, sit out
else:
action = argmax(Q)
Or equivalently: action = if confidence_high(alpha_logit, ISV[543])
{ argmax(Q) over Buy/Sell actions } else { Wait }.
Once slot 543 is consumed, re-run alpha_compose_backtest and expect
Sharpe to move toward / past the Phase 1d.4 baseline.
Loader refactor: extracted load_fill_model_from_json, load_alpha_cache,
load_snapshots_from_fxcache from alpha_dqn_h600_smoke.rs into
crates/ml/src/env/loaders.rs. The smoke now calls the shared module
via ml::env::loaders::*. ~150 lines of duplicated code removed.
Build + run verified: smoke still builds clean. Backtest runs in ~30s
(train 8s + eval 20s + setup).
Branch: sp20-aux-h-fixed, pushed.
ml
10-model ML ensemble for the Foxhunt HFT system, built on Candle v0.9.1.
Models
- DQN (Rainbow) — deep Q-network with prioritized replay, dueling heads, noisy nets
- PPO — proximal policy optimization with GAE, LSTM policies, clip-higher
- TFT — temporal fusion transformer for multi-horizon forecasting
- Mamba2 — state space model for sequence prediction
- Liquid Networks — biologically inspired networks for non-stationary data
- TLOB — transformer-based limit order book analysis
- KAN — Kolmogorov-Arnold networks
- xLSTM — extended LSTM architecture
- TGGN — temporal graph neural network
- Diffusion — diffusion-based generative model
Key Modules
ensemble— model ensemble coordination and confidence aggregationhyperopt— PSO-based hyperparameter optimization with per-model adapterstrainers— unified training loops (DQN, PPO, supervised)inference—InferenceAdaptertrait for predictioncheckpoint— model checkpointing and restorationevaluation— walk-forward evaluation pipeline
Usage
use ml::dqn::DQN;
use ml::ppo::PpoTrainer;