Files
foxhunt/WAVE112_AGENT16_QUICKREF.txt
jgrusewski 00d3f50846 📊 Wave 112 Agents 16-18, 20: Comprehensive coverage measurement and analysis
Coverage Results:
- trading_engine: 33.87% (1,664/4,910 lines)
- api_gateway: 18.95% (659/3,477 lines)
- risk: 51.52% (1,061/2,059 lines)
- common: 82.89% (366/441 lines)
- config: 67.59% (73/108 lines)
- storage: 21.79% (119/546 lines)
- ml: ~30% (estimated)
- data: 22.53% (340/1,509 lines)
- services: 5.3% (critical gap)

Workspace Total: 29.8% (weighted by LOC)
Generated 12+ detailed HTML coverage reports with actionable roadmaps
2025-10-05 22:22:06 +02:00

138 lines
7.4 KiB
Plaintext

╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ WAVE 112 AGENT 16: ML CRATE COVERAGE MEASUREMENT ║
╠═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ STATUS: ✅ COMPLETE - 571/576 tests passed (99.1%) ║
╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
📊 COVERAGE HIGHLIGHTS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
✅ EXCELLENT (>90% Line Coverage)
• dqn/multi_step_new.rs 100.00% (82/82 lines)
• dqn/performance_validation.rs 100.00% (82/82 lines)
• integration/distillation.rs 100.00% (13/13 lines)
• dqn/multi_step.rs 97.85% (319/326 lines)
• dqn/rainbow_agent.rs 97.74% (130/133 lines)
• dqn/noisy_exploration.rs 95.80% (137/143 lines)
• checkpoint/integration_tests.rs 94.40% (438/464 lines)
• dqn/prioritized_replay.rs 91.37% (360/394 lines)
• checkpoint/mod.rs 91.09% (450/494 lines)
• integration/model_registry.rs 91.37% (180/197 lines)
🟡 GOOD (70-89% Line Coverage)
• features.rs 82.26% (1,994/2,424 lines) ⭐ LARGEST
• inference.rs 82.28% (771/937 lines)
• checkpoint/validation.rs 83.95% (272/324 lines)
• dqn/noisy_layers.rs 85.53% (136/159 lines)
• batch_processing.rs 80.05% (313/391 lines)
• checkpoint/compression.rs 81.52% (172/211 lines)
🔴 CRITICAL GAPS (0% Coverage)
• checkpoint/model_implementations.rs 0% (703 lines) ⚠️
• dqn/rainbow_agent_impl.rs 0% (274 lines) ⚠️
• ensemble/** (entire package) 0% (all modules) ⚠️
• common/database.rs 0% (132 lines)
• common/trading.rs 0% (87 lines)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
⚠️ FAILED TESTS (5 total - all GPU/performance related)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. test_model_loading_multiple_models
└─> GPU required (CUDA not built)
2. test_batch_differentiator
└─> Latency exceeds threshold
3. test_triple_barrier_benchmark
└─> Latency exceeds 2x threshold
4. test_benchmark_simd_performance
└─> Average time > 10μs
5. test_rainbow_network_performance
└─> Inference 18,351μs (too slow)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📋 COVERAGE BY MODEL TYPE
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
DQN (Deep Q-Network)
Core: 48-71% (needs improvement)
Rainbow: 35-98% (mixed)
Replay: 75-97% (excellent)
Performance: 76-100% (good)
Exploration: 93-96% (excellent)
Checkpoint Management
Integration: 94% (excellent)
Core: 91% (excellent)
Compression: 81% (good)
Validation: 84% (good)
Models: 0% (CRITICAL GAP)
Inference & Integration
Engine: 82% (good)
Registry: 91% (excellent)
Coordinator: 22% (needs work)
Transformer Models
PPO: 87-100% (excellent)
TFT: 80-100% (excellent)
TGNN: 80-100% (excellent)
Liquid: 45-100% (varied)
MAMBA: 50-100% (selective state strong)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🎯 IMMEDIATE PRIORITIES
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Priority 1: Critical Gaps (Week 113)
1. Add model_implementations tests (703 lines, 0%)
2. Add ensemble package tests (entire package)
3. Test rainbow_agent_impl (274 lines, 0%)
4. Test common module (database, metrics, performance)
Priority 2: GPU/Performance (Week 113)
1. Mock GPU requirements OR enable CUDA
2. Optimize Rainbow network (18ms → <10ms)
3. Fix SIMD performance (<10μs)
4. Tune labeling latencies
Priority 3: Coverage Improvement (Week 114)
1. DQN agent: 51% → 75%
2. Coordinator: 22% → 60%
3. Examples: 36% → 60%
4. Benchmarks: 9% → 40%
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📁 ARTIFACTS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📊 HTML Report: coverage_report_ml/html/index.html (42,644 lines)
📝 Analysis: WAVE112_AGENT16_ML_COVERAGE.md (detailed breakdown)
📋 Quick Ref: WAVE112_AGENT16_QUICKREF.txt (this file)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📈 KEY METRICS
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Test Pass Rate: 99.1% (571/576)
Failed Tests: 5 (GPU/performance)
Test Duration: 1.88 seconds
100% Coverage Modules: 6
0% Coverage Modules: 8
Critical Gaps: 3 (model_impl, ensemble, common)
HTML Report Size: 42,644 lines
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
NEXT: Agent 17 - Measure trading_engine coverage
Agent 18 - Calculate workspace totals
Agent 19 - Compare to Wave 111 baseline (42.6%)