Files
foxhunt/ml/examples/model_diversity_analysis.rs
jgrusewski 35feadf55e 🚀 Wave 160 Phase 6: CUDA Mandatory + TDD Testing + TFT Complete (21 Agents)
## Major Achievements

### 1. CUDA Made Default & Mandatory (Agent 143)
- CUDA now default feature in ml/Cargo.toml
- All training requires GPU (no silent CPU fallback)
- Added get_training_device() helper with fail-fast errors
- Removed --use-gpu flags (GPU mandatory)
- **Impact**: No more wasting time on accidental CPU training

### 2. TFT Training COMPLETE (Agent 144)
-  Training completed successfully in 7.6 minutes
-  Early stopping at epoch 100/200 (best val loss: 0.097318)
-  11 checkpoints saved to ml/trained_models/production/tft/
-  GPU Performance: 99% utilization, 367MB VRAM, 4.4s/epoch
-  10x speedup vs CPU (4.4s vs 43-55s per epoch)
- **Status**: PRODUCTION READY

### 3. TFT CUDA Tensor Contiguity Fix (Agent 142)
- Fixed "matmul not supported for non-contiguous tensors" error
- Added .contiguous() call after narrow() operation in QuantileLayer
- Enabled CUDA-accelerated TFT training
- **Files**: ml/src/tft/quantile_outputs.rs

### 4. MAMBA-2 CUDA Layer Normalization (Agent 145)
- Created CudaLayerNorm wrapper for missing CUDA kernel
- Implemented manual layer norm: γ * (x - μ) / sqrt(σ² + ε) + β
- MAMBA-2 now runs on CUDA (no more "no cuda implementation" error)
- **Files**: ml/src/mamba/mod.rs

### 5. TDD E2E Test Suite (Agent 146) 
- Created comprehensive MAMBA-2 test suite (297 lines)
- 7 tests: shapes, batches, CUDA, gradients, configs
- **16x faster debugging**: 5s per iteration vs 80s
- Already caught dtype mismatch bug (F32 vs F64)
- **Files**: ml/tests/e2e_mamba2_training.rs

## Agent Summary (Agents 126-146)

### Code Fixes (Parallel - Agents 137-141)
- **Agent 137**: MAMBA-2 batch dimension fix (streaming + batch loaders)
- **Agent 138**: Liquid NN API fix (mutable loader, iterator fix)
- **Agent 139**: PPO CheckpointMetadata fix (signature fields)
- **Agent 140**: Paper trading executor (498 lines, 100ms polling)
- **Agent 141**: Real model loading (RealDQNModel, RealPPOModel)

### Infrastructure (Agents 143-146)
- **Agent 143**: CUDA mandatory (Cargo.toml, device helpers)
- **Agent 144**: TFT verification (completion monitoring)
- **Agent 145**: MAMBA-2 CUDA layer norm wrapper
- **Agent 146**: TDD E2E test suite (16x faster debugging)

## Files Modified

### Core ML Infrastructure
- ml/Cargo.toml: Added default = ["minimal-inference", "cuda"]
- ml/src/lib.rs: Added get_training_device() helper (+109 lines)
- ml/src/tft/quantile_outputs.rs: Fixed tensor contiguity
- ml/src/mamba/mod.rs: Added CudaLayerNorm wrapper (+41 lines)

### Training Scripts
- ml/examples/train_tft_dbn.rs: Removed --use-gpu flag
- ml/examples/train_ppo.rs: Removed --use-gpu flag
- ml/examples/train_mamba2_dbn.rs: Forced CUDA-only mode
- ml/examples/train_liquid_dbn.rs: Fixed API usage

### Data Loaders
- ml/src/data_loaders/dbn_sequence_loader.rs: Fixed batch dimensions
- ml/src/data_loaders/streaming_dbn_loader.rs: Fixed batch dimensions

### Trading Service
- services/trading_service/src/paper_trading_executor.rs: New executor (+498 lines)
- services/trading_service/src/services/enhanced_ml.rs: Real model loading
- services/trading_service/src/ensemble_coordinator.rs: Integration

### Tests
- ml/tests/e2e_mamba2_training.rs: New TDD test suite (+297 lines)

### Trainers
- ml/src/trainers/tft.rs: Fixed CheckpointMetadata signature fields

## Performance Metrics

### TFT Training
- Duration: 7.6 minutes (100 epochs with early stopping)
- GPU Utilization: 99%
- GPU Memory: 367MB / 4GB (9%)
- Epoch Time: 4.4 seconds (vs 43-55s on CPU)
- Speedup: 10x vs CPU
- Status:  PRODUCTION READY

### TDD Testing
- Test Execution: 5-10 seconds per test
- Debugging Iteration: 5 seconds (vs 80 seconds before)
- Speedup: 16x faster debugging
- First Bug Found: <1 minute (dtype mismatch)

## Documentation
- 21 comprehensive agent reports
- TDD quick start guide
- CUDA troubleshooting guide
- Training verification procedures

## Next Steps
1. Fix MAMBA-2 dtype mismatch (F32→F64) - 2 minutes
2. Run MAMBA-2 tests until passing - 5-10 minutes
3. Launch full MAMBA-2 training - 200 epochs
4. Launch Liquid NN training

## System Status
- TFT:  COMPLETE (production ready)
- MAMBA-2: 🧪 IN TESTING (TDD suite ready)
- CUDA:  DEFAULT (mandatory for training)
- Tests:  16x faster debugging

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-10-14 23:13:34 +02:00

560 lines
18 KiB
Rust

//! Model Diversity and Correlation Analysis
//!
//! This example computes the prediction correlation matrix for all available models
//! and identifies the optimal ensemble composition based on diversity and Sharpe ratio.
//!
//! Analysis includes:
//! - 6x6 correlation matrix (DQN, PPO, TFT, MAMBA-2, Liquid, TLOB)
//! - Diversity score (average pairwise correlation)
//! - Ensemble size testing (3, 4, 5, 6 models)
//! - Sharpe ratio vs latency tradeoff
//! - Optimal composition recommendation
use anyhow::Result;
use ml::ensemble::coordinator_extended::{ExtendedEnsembleCoordinator, EnsembleConfig};
use ml::ModelPrediction;
use std::collections::HashMap;
use std::time::Instant;
use tracing::{info, Level};
use tracing_subscriber::FmtSubscriber;
/// Model characteristics based on training analysis
#[derive(Clone)]
struct ModelCharacteristics {
name: String,
sharpe: f64, // Expected Sharpe ratio
correlation: f64, // Correlation with market signal
latency_us: f64, // Inference latency in microseconds
}
impl ModelCharacteristics {
fn new(name: &str, sharpe: f64, correlation: f64, latency_us: f64) -> Self {
Self {
name: name.to_string(),
sharpe,
correlation,
latency_us,
}
}
/// Generate prediction based on market signal
fn predict(&self, market_signal: f64, noise: f64) -> f64 {
market_signal * self.correlation + noise
}
/// Get confidence from Sharpe ratio
fn confidence(&self) -> f64 {
((self.sharpe / 2.5).max(0.5).min(1.0) + 0.2).min(1.0)
}
}
/// Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient
fn pearson_correlation(x: &[f64], y: &[f64]) -> f64 {
let n = x.len().min(y.len());
if n < 2 {
return 0.0;
}
let mean_x: f64 = x.iter().sum::<f64>() / n as f64;
let mean_y: f64 = y.iter().sum::<f64>() / n as f64;
let mut numerator = 0.0;
let mut sum_sq_x = 0.0;
let mut sum_sq_y = 0.0;
for i in 0..n {
let dx = x[i] - mean_x;
let dy = y[i] - mean_y;
numerator += dx * dy;
sum_sq_x += dx * dx;
sum_sq_y += dy * dy;
}
let denominator = (sum_sq_x * sum_sq_y).sqrt();
if denominator < 1e-10 {
0.0
} else {
numerator / denominator
}
}
/// Calculate Sharpe ratio from returns
fn calculate_sharpe_ratio(returns: &[f64]) -> f64 {
if returns.len() < 2 {
return 0.0;
}
let mean_return = returns.iter().sum::<f64>() / returns.len() as f64;
let variance = returns
.iter()
.map(|r| (r - mean_return).powi(2))
.sum::<f64>()
/ returns.len() as f64;
let std_dev = variance.sqrt();
if std_dev < 1e-10 {
0.0
} else {
let annualization_factor = (252.0 * 6.5 * 60.0_f64).sqrt();
(mean_return / std_dev) * annualization_factor
}
}
/// Test ensemble with specific model combination
async fn test_ensemble_combination(
models: &[&ModelCharacteristics],
num_predictions: usize,
) -> Result<(f64, f64, f64)> {
let config = EnsembleConfig {
adaptive_weighting: true,
min_correlation_threshold: 0.7,
diversity_adjustment_factor: 0.2,
performance_window_size: 1000,
min_weight: 0.05,
max_weight: 0.40,
};
let coordinator = ExtendedEnsembleCoordinator::new(config);
// Register models with equal weights
let weight = 1.0 / models.len() as f64;
for model in models {
coordinator
.register_model(model.name.clone(), weight)
.await?;
}
let mut ensemble_returns = Vec::new();
let mut total_latency_us = 0.0;
let start = Instant::now();
for i in 0..num_predictions {
// Generate market signal
let market_signal = ((i as f64 * 0.314159265359).fract() - 0.48) * 0.02;
// Generate noise for each model
let noise_base = (i as f64 * 0.618033988749895).fract() - 0.5;
// Create predictions
let predictions: Vec<ModelPrediction> = models
.iter()
.enumerate()
.map(|(idx, model)| {
let noise = (noise_base + idx as f64 * 0.1) * 0.2;
let value = model.predict(market_signal, noise);
ModelPrediction::new(model.name.clone(), value, model.confidence())
})
.collect();
// Make ensemble decision
let decision = coordinator.predict(predictions.clone()).await?;
// Simulate trading outcome
let ensemble_return = if decision.signal > 0.1 {
market_signal * 0.95
} else if decision.signal < -0.1 {
-market_signal * 0.95
} else {
0.0
};
ensemble_returns.push(ensemble_return);
// Record individual outcomes
for pred in predictions {
let model_return = if pred.value > 0.1 {
market_signal * 0.9
} else if pred.value < -0.1 {
-market_signal * 0.9
} else {
0.0
};
coordinator
.record_outcome(&pred.model_id, model_return)
.await?;
}
// Accumulate latency
for model in models {
total_latency_us += model.latency_us;
}
}
let _elapsed = start.elapsed();
let avg_latency_us = total_latency_us / num_predictions as f64;
let sharpe = calculate_sharpe_ratio(&ensemble_returns);
// Get diversity metrics
let diversity = coordinator.get_diversity_metrics().await;
Ok((sharpe, avg_latency_us, diversity.avg_correlation))
}
#[tokio::main]
async fn main() -> Result<()> {
// Initialize tracing
let subscriber = FmtSubscriber::builder()
.with_max_level(Level::INFO)
.finish();
tracing::subscriber::set_global_default(subscriber)?;
info!("🔬 MODEL DIVERSITY AND CORRELATION ANALYSIS");
info!("=" .repeat(80));
info!("");
// Define model characteristics based on training results
// Source: Agent 78 (DQN), Agent 54 (PPO), checkpoint analysis reports
let models = vec![
ModelCharacteristics::new("DQN", 2.31, 0.80, 15.0), // Agent 78 epoch 30: Sharpe 2.31
ModelCharacteristics::new("PPO", 1.85, 0.75, 18.0), // PPO epoch 380: Sharpe ~1.85
ModelCharacteristics::new("TFT", 1.45, 0.60, 25.0), // Estimated: Moderate Sharpe
ModelCharacteristics::new("MAMBA-2", 1.92, 0.70, 20.0), // Estimated: Good Sharpe
ModelCharacteristics::new("Liquid", 1.38, 0.50, 12.0), // Estimated: Lower Sharpe, fast
ModelCharacteristics::new("TLOB", 1.56, 0.55, 8.0), // Estimated: Moderate, very fast
];
// Step 1: Compute 6x6 correlation matrix
info!("📊 STEP 1: Computing 6x6 Correlation Matrix");
info!("-" .repeat(80));
let num_samples = 1000;
let mut prediction_history: HashMap<String, Vec<f64>> = HashMap::new();
for i in 0..num_samples {
let market_signal = ((i as f64 * 0.314159265359).fract() - 0.48) * 0.02;
let noise_base = (i as f64 * 0.618033988749895).fract() - 0.5;
for (idx, model) in models.iter().enumerate() {
let noise = (noise_base + idx as f64 * 0.1) * 0.2;
let value = model.predict(market_signal, noise);
prediction_history
.entry(model.name.clone())
.or_insert_with(Vec::new)
.push(value);
}
}
// Calculate correlation matrix
info!("");
info!("Correlation Matrix (6x6):");
info!("");
// Print header
print!(" ");
for model in &models {
print!("{:>8} ", model.name);
}
println!();
// Print matrix
let mut total_correlation = 0.0;
let mut correlation_count = 0;
for i in 0..models.len() {
print!("{:<10}", models[i].name);
for j in 0..models.len() {
if i == j {
print!(" 1.000 ");
} else {
let hist_i = prediction_history.get(&models[i].name).unwrap();
let hist_j = prediction_history.get(&models[j].name).unwrap();
let corr = pearson_correlation(hist_i, hist_j);
print!("{:>8.3} ", corr);
if i < j {
total_correlation += corr.abs();
correlation_count += 1;
}
}
}
println!();
}
let avg_correlation = total_correlation / correlation_count as f64;
info!("");
info!("Average Pairwise Correlation: {:.3}", avg_correlation);
info!("Diversity Score: {:.3} (1 - avg_corr)", 1.0 - avg_correlation);
info!("");
// Step 2: Test different ensemble sizes
info!("📈 STEP 2: Testing Ensemble Sizes (3, 4, 5, 6 models)");
info!("-" .repeat(80));
info!("");
let test_predictions = 1000;
// Test 3-model ensembles (all combinations)
info!("Testing 3-Model Ensembles:");
let three_model_combos = vec![
vec![&models[0], &models[1], &models[2]], // DQN, PPO, TFT
vec![&models[0], &models[1], &models[3]], // DQN, PPO, MAMBA-2
vec![&models[0], &models[2], &models[4]], // DQN, TFT, Liquid
vec![&models[1], &models[3], &models[5]], // PPO, MAMBA-2, TLOB
];
let mut best_3_sharpe = 0.0;
let mut best_3_combo = String::new();
let mut best_3_latency = 0.0;
for combo in &three_model_combos {
let names: Vec<String> = combo.iter().map(|m| m.name.clone()).collect();
let (sharpe, latency, diversity) = test_ensemble_combination(combo, test_predictions).await?;
info!(
" {} | Sharpe: {:>6.3} | Latency: {:>5.0}μs | Diversity: {:.3}",
names.join(", "),
sharpe,
latency,
1.0 - diversity
);
if sharpe > best_3_sharpe {
best_3_sharpe = sharpe;
best_3_combo = names.join(", ");
best_3_latency = latency;
}
}
info!("");
// Test 4-model ensemble
info!("Testing 4-Model Ensembles:");
let four_model_combos = vec![
vec![&models[0], &models[1], &models[3], &models[5]], // DQN, PPO, MAMBA-2, TLOB
vec![&models[0], &models[1], &models[2], &models[4]], // DQN, PPO, TFT, Liquid
];
let mut best_4_sharpe = 0.0;
let mut best_4_combo = String::new();
let mut best_4_latency = 0.0;
for combo in &four_model_combos {
let names: Vec<String> = combo.iter().map(|m| m.name.clone()).collect();
let (sharpe, latency, diversity) = test_ensemble_combination(combo, test_predictions).await?;
info!(
" {} | Sharpe: {:>6.3} | Latency: {:>5.0}μs | Diversity: {:.3}",
names.join(", "),
sharpe,
latency,
1.0 - diversity
);
if sharpe > best_4_sharpe {
best_4_sharpe = sharpe;
best_4_combo = names.join(", ");
best_4_latency = latency;
}
}
info!("");
// Test 5-model ensemble
info!("Testing 5-Model Ensemble:");
let five_model_combo = vec![&models[0], &models[1], &models[2], &models[3], &models[5]];
let names: Vec<String> = five_model_combo.iter().map(|m| m.name.clone()).collect();
let (sharpe_5, latency_5, diversity_5) =
test_ensemble_combination(&five_model_combo, test_predictions).await?;
info!(
" {} | Sharpe: {:>6.3} | Latency: {:>5.0}μs | Diversity: {:.3}",
names.join(", "),
sharpe_5,
latency_5,
1.0 - diversity_5
);
info!("");
// Test 6-model ensemble
info!("Testing 6-Model Ensemble:");
let six_model_combo: Vec<&ModelCharacteristics> = models.iter().collect();
let names: Vec<String> = six_model_combo.iter().map(|m| m.name.clone()).collect();
let (sharpe_6, latency_6, diversity_6) =
test_ensemble_combination(&six_model_combo, test_predictions).await?;
info!(
" {} | Sharpe: {:>6.3} | Latency: {:>5.0}μs | Diversity: {:.3}",
names.join(", "),
sharpe_6,
latency_6,
1.0 - diversity_6
);
info!("");
// Step 3: Sharpe vs Latency Tradeoff Analysis
info!("⚖️ STEP 3: Sharpe Ratio vs Latency Tradeoff");
info!("-" .repeat(80));
info!("");
let latency_budget_us = 50.0;
info!("Latency Budget: {:.0}μs (HFT requirement)", latency_budget_us);
info!("");
let results = vec![
("3-model (best)", best_3_sharpe, best_3_latency),
("4-model (best)", best_4_sharpe, best_4_latency),
("5-model", sharpe_5, latency_5),
("6-model", sharpe_6, latency_6),
];
info!("{:<20} {:>10} {:>12} {:>15}", "Ensemble", "Sharpe", "Latency (μs)", "Within Budget?");
info!("-" .repeat(60));
for (name, sharpe, latency) in &results {
let within_budget = if *latency <= latency_budget_us {
"✅ YES"
} else {
"❌ NO"
};
info!(
"{:<20} {:>10.3} {:>12.0} {:>15}",
name, sharpe, latency, within_budget
);
}
info!("");
// Step 4: Optimal Composition Recommendation
info!("🎯 STEP 4: Optimal Ensemble Composition");
info!("-" .repeat(80));
info!("");
// Find best combination within latency budget
let mut best_sharpe = 0.0;
let mut best_ensemble = String::new();
let mut best_latency = 0.0;
let mut best_size = 0;
for (name, sharpe, latency) in &results {
if *latency <= latency_budget_us && *sharpe > best_sharpe {
best_sharpe = *sharpe;
best_ensemble = name.to_string();
best_latency = *latency;
if name.contains("3-model") {
best_size = 3;
} else if name.contains("4-model") {
best_size = 4;
} else if name.contains("5-model") {
best_size = 5;
} else {
best_size = 6;
}
}
}
if best_size > 0 {
info!("✅ RECOMMENDED ENSEMBLE");
info!("");
info!(" Configuration: {}", best_ensemble);
info!(" Models: {}", if best_size == 3 {
best_3_combo.as_str()
} else if best_size == 4 {
best_4_combo.as_str()
} else if best_size == 5 {
"DQN, PPO, TFT, MAMBA-2, TLOB"
} else {
"All 6 models"
});
info!(" Expected Sharpe: {:.3}", best_sharpe);
info!(" Average Latency: {:.0}μs", best_latency);
info!(" Latency Budget: {:.0}μs ({}% utilized)", latency_budget_us, (best_latency / latency_budget_us * 100.0));
info!("");
if best_sharpe > 1.5 {
info!(" 🎉 Excellent! Sharpe > 1.5 (production-ready)");
} else if best_sharpe > 1.2 {
info!(" ✅ Good! Sharpe > 1.2 (viable for production)");
} else {
info!(" ⚠️ Moderate Sharpe. Consider further optimization.");
}
} else {
info!("⚠️ WARNING: No ensemble meets latency budget of {:.0}μs", latency_budget_us);
info!("");
info!("Recommendations:");
info!(" 1. Increase latency budget to {:.0}μs", best_3_latency);
info!(" 2. Optimize model inference (GPU acceleration)");
info!(" 3. Use sequential ensemble (fast models first)");
}
info!("");
// Step 5: Model-Specific Recommendations
info!("📋 STEP 5: Model-Specific Recommendations");
info!("-" .repeat(80));
info!("");
info!("Individual Model Performance:");
info!("");
let mut sorted_models = models.clone();
sorted_models.sort_by(|a, b| b.sharpe.partial_cmp(&a.sharpe).unwrap());
for model in &sorted_models {
let rank = if model.sharpe > 2.0 {
"⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)"
} else if model.sharpe > 1.5 {
"⭐⭐ (Good)"
} else {
"⭐ (Moderate)"
};
info!(
" {:<12} Sharpe: {:>6.3} | Latency: {:>5.0}μs | Correlation: {:.2} | {}",
model.name, model.sharpe, model.latency_us, model.correlation, rank
);
}
info!("");
info!("Model Selection Criteria:");
info!(" ✅ Include: DQN (highest Sharpe: 2.31)");
info!(" ✅ Include: MAMBA-2 (good Sharpe: 1.92, diverse)");
info!(" ✅ Include: PPO (solid Sharpe: 1.85, stable)");
info!(" ⚠️ Consider: TLOB (fastest: 8μs, moderate Sharpe)");
info!(" ⚠️ Consider: TFT (diverse: 0.60 correlation)");
info!(" ⚠️ Optional: Liquid (diversity benefit, low correlation)");
info!("");
info!("=" .repeat(80));
info!("✅ ANALYSIS COMPLETE");
info!("");
// Summary metrics
info!("📊 SUMMARY METRICS");
info!("");
info!(" Average Model Correlation: {:.3}", avg_correlation);
info!(" Best 3-Model Sharpe: {:.3}", best_3_sharpe);
info!(" Best 4-Model Sharpe: {:.3}", best_4_sharpe);
info!(" 5-Model Sharpe: {:.3}", sharpe_5);
info!(" 6-Model Sharpe: {:.3}", sharpe_6);
info!(" Optimal Ensemble Size: {} models", best_size);
info!("");
// Improvement vs best individual
let best_individual_sharpe = sorted_models[0].sharpe;
let improvement = (best_sharpe / best_individual_sharpe - 1.0) * 100.0;
if improvement > 15.0 {
info!(" 🎉 Ensemble improvement: +{:.1}% over best individual", improvement);
info!(" (Exceeds 15% target - excellent diversification benefit)");
} else if improvement > 10.0 {
info!(" ✅ Ensemble improvement: +{:.1}% over best individual", improvement);
info!(" (Good diversification benefit, approaching 15% target)");
} else {
info!(" ⚠️ Ensemble improvement: +{:.1}% over best individual", improvement);
info!(" (Below 10% target - consider adjusting model weights)");
}
info!("");
Ok(())
}