Files
foxhunt/tli/tests/file_storage_encryption.rs
jgrusewski 83629f9ca8 feat(deployment): Complete Runpod GPU deployment infrastructure
Implement comprehensive Runpod deployment with S3 volume mount architecture for
FP32 ML model training on Tesla V100 GPUs.

## Infrastructure Components

### Deployment Scripts (scripts/)
- runpod_deploy.sh: Master deployment orchestrator (8-step workflow)
- runpod_upload.sh: S3 upload for binaries and test data
- upload_env_to_runpod.sh: Secure .env credentials upload
- runpod_deploy_test.sh: Prerequisites validation

### Docker Configuration
- Dockerfile.runpod: Multi-stage CUDA 12.1 runtime (~2GB, no binaries)
- entrypoint.sh: Volume verification and training execution
- Architecture: Volume mount (NO S3 downloads in pods)

### S3 Configuration
- Bucket: se3zdnb5o4 (Iceland region: eur-is-1)
- Endpoint: https://s3api-eur-is-1.runpod.io
- Structure: binaries/, test_data/, models/, .env

### OpenTofu Infrastructure (terraform/runpod/)
- main.tf: Pod and volume resources
- variables.tf: Configuration variables
- outputs.tf: Pod connection info
- Security: NO credentials in state (uses volume .env)

## Deployment Assets Uploaded

### Training Binaries (77MB)
- train_tft_parquet (23M) - TFT-225 features
- train_mamba2_parquet (22M) - MAMBA-2 state space
- train_dqn (22M) - Deep Q-Network
- train_ppo (13M) - Proximal Policy Optimization

### Test Data (13.8 MB)
- 9 Parquet files: ES.FUT, NQ.FUT, 6E.FUT, ZN.FUT (180-day datasets)

### Credentials
- .env file (1.5 KB, private access, chmod 600)

## Documentation

### Deployment Guides
- RUNPOD_DEPLOYMENT_READY_SUMMARY.md: Complete deployment status
- RUNPOD_VOLUME_DEPLOYMENT_GUIDE.md: Step-by-step guide (42KB)
- RUNPOD_DEPLOYMENT_QUICK_START.md: Quick reference
- RUNPOD_UPLOAD_GUIDE.md: S3 upload instructions
- RUNPOD_VOLUME_CONFIGURATION_COMPLETE.md: S3 setup report
- RUNPOD_S3_PARQUET_UPLOAD_REPORT.md: Data upload verification

### Architecture Documentation
- RUNPOD_VOLUME_MOUNT_ARCHITECTURE.md: Volume mount design
- RUNPOD_S3_ARCHITECTURE_DIAGRAM.txt: S3 API vs filesystem access
- DOCKERFILE_RUNPOD_FINAL_SUMMARY.md: Docker image specification

### Decision Documentation
- RUNPOD_DEPLOYMENT_CHECKLIST.md: Go/no-go decision matrix (27KB)
- RUNPOD_DEPLOYMENT_DECISION_TREE.md: Decision workflow
- FP32_RUNPOD_DEPLOYMENT_READY.md: FP32 deployment readiness

## QAT Enhancements

### Core QAT Infrastructure
- ml/src/memory_optimization/qat.rs: Enhanced QAT observer (+226 lines)
- ml/src/memory_optimization/auto_batch_size.rs: OOM recovery (+84 lines)
- ml/src/tft/qat_tft.rs: QAT TFT wrapper (+154 lines)
- ml/src/trainers/tft.rs: QAT training integration (+433 lines)
- ml/src/qat_metrics_exporter.rs: NEW - QAT metrics export

### QAT Testing
- ml/tests/qat_integration_tests.rs: NEW - Integration test suite
- ml/tests/qat_gradient_clipping_test.rs: NEW - Gradient clipping tests
- ml/tests/qat_device_consistency_test.rs: Device mismatch tests (+205 lines)
- ml/tests/qat_accuracy_validation_test.rs: Accuracy validation
- ml/tests/qat_tft_integration_test.rs: TFT QAT integration

### QAT Documentation
- ml/docs/QAT_GUIDE.md: Comprehensive QAT guide (+616 lines)
- ml/docs/QAT_GRADIENT_CHECKPOINTING_WORKAROUND.md: NEW - Workaround guide
- QAT_BLOCKERS_ROOT_CAUSE_ANALYSIS.md: P0 blocker analysis (44KB)
- QAT_ACCURACY_VALIDATION_REPORT.md: Accuracy comparison
- QAT_GRADIENT_CLIPPING_VALIDATION_REPORT.md: Clipping validation

### QAT Monitoring
- config/grafana/dashboards/qat-training-metrics.json: NEW - Grafana dashboard

## AWS CLI Configuration

### Credentials Setup
- ~/.aws/credentials: Runpod profile configured
  - Access Key: user_2xxA3XcIFj16yfL3aBon9niiSpr
  - Secret Key: (from RUNPOD_S3_SECRET)
- ~/.aws/config: Iceland region (eur-is-1)

## Production Readiness

### FP32 Models:  READY FOR DEPLOYMENT
- DQN: 15-20s training, ~6MB GPU memory
- PPO: 7-10s training, ~145MB GPU memory
- MAMBA-2: 2-3 min training, ~164MB GPU memory
- TFT-225: 3-5 min training, ~500MB GPU memory
- Total GPU Budget: 815MB (fits on 4GB+ Tesla V100)

### QAT Models: 🔴 BLOCKED
- 24 tests implemented but DO NOT COMPILE (11 errors)
- 3 P0 blockers: device mismatch, gradient checkpointing, OOM recovery
- Timeline: 1-2 weeks to fix (13h P0 fixes + validation)

### Wave D Features:  OPERATIONAL
- 225 features fully integrated
- Feature extraction: 5.10μs/bar (196x faster than target)
- Wave D backtest: Sharpe 2.00, Win Rate 60%, Drawdown 15%
- Database migration 045: Applied cleanly, zero conflicts

## Cost Analysis

### One-Time Setup
- Network Volume: $4/month (50GB SSD)
- Upload costs: FREE (S3 API included)

### Per Training Run (TFT-225)
- GPU: Tesla V100-PCIE-16GB @ $0.29/hr
- Training Time: ~4 hours
- Cost per run: $1.16

### Monthly (20 Training Runs)
- Storage: $4.00/month
- Training: $23.20/month (20 runs × $1.16)
- Total: $27.20/month

## Security

### Credentials Management
-  NO credentials in Docker image
-  NO credentials in Terraform state
-  .env gitignored and not committed
-  .env file private on S3 (HTTP 401 on public access)
-  Docker Hub repository PRIVATE (jgrusewski/foxhunt)

### Access Control
- S3 API: Local client uploads only
- Volume mount: Pod filesystem access only
- Authentication: AWS CLI with Runpod profile required

## Next Steps

1.  COMPLETE: Build Docker image
2.  PENDING: Push to Docker Hub
3.  PENDING: Deploy pod via Runpod console
4.  PENDING: Validate training on Tesla V100

## Performance Targets

- Build time: 5-10 min
- Upload time: ~20 sec (90MB total)
- Pod startup: ~30 sec
- Training time: 3-5 min (TFT-225)
- Total deployment: ~40 min from start to first training run

## Test Status

- FP32 tests: 597/608 passing (98.2%)
- QAT tests: 0/24 passing (compilation errors)
- Overall: 2,062/2,086 passing (98.8% excluding QAT)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-10-24 01:11:43 +02:00

333 lines
10 KiB
Rust

//! Integration tests for FileTokenStorage encryption
//!
//! These tests verify:
//! - Encrypted token storage and retrieval
//! - Backward compatibility (hex → encrypted migration)
//! - Encryption key derivation consistency
//! - Error handling for corrupted/invalid data
//!
//! Note: Requires test-utils feature to access with_directory() method
// Suppress false-positive unused_crate_dependencies warnings
// dev-dependencies are shared across ALL test targets in the crate
// This test may not use all deps, but they are required by other integration tests
#![allow(unused_crate_dependencies)]
#![cfg(feature = "test-utils")]
use anyhow::Result;
use std::fs;
use std::path::PathBuf;
use tempfile::TempDir;
use tli::auth::token_manager::{FileTokenStorage, TokenStorage};
/// Helper: Create FileTokenStorage with temporary directory
fn create_test_storage() -> Result<(FileTokenStorage, TempDir)> {
let temp_dir = TempDir::new()?;
let storage = FileTokenStorage::with_directory(temp_dir.path().to_path_buf())?;
Ok((storage, temp_dir))
}
/// Helper: Get token file path
fn get_token_path(temp_dir: &TempDir, token_type: &str) -> PathBuf {
temp_dir.path().join(format!("{}_token", token_type))
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_file_storage_encrypted_roundtrip() -> Result<()> {
let (storage, temp_dir) = create_test_storage()?;
let test_token = "test_access_token_12345";
// Store token
storage.store_access_token(test_token).await?;
// Verify file contains "ENC:" prefix (not hex)
let token_path = get_token_path(&temp_dir, "access");
let file_contents = fs::read_to_string(&token_path)?;
assert!(
file_contents.starts_with("ENC:"),
"Token file should have ENC: prefix, got: {}",
&file_contents[..10.min(file_contents.len())]
);
// Verify it's NOT hex format
assert!(
!file_contents.chars().all(|c| c.is_ascii_hexdigit()),
"Token should not be in hex format"
);
// Retrieve token and verify it matches original
let retrieved = storage.get_access_token().await?;
assert_eq!(
retrieved.as_deref(),
Some(test_token),
"Retrieved token should match original"
);
// Cleanup
drop(storage);
Ok(())
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_file_storage_migration_hex_to_encrypted() -> Result<()> {
let (storage, temp_dir) = create_test_storage()?;
let test_token = "test_migration_token_67890";
let token_path = get_token_path(&temp_dir, "access");
// Manually create hex-encoded token file (Wave 154 format)
let hex_encoded = hex::encode(test_token.as_bytes());
fs::write(&token_path, &hex_encoded)?;
println!("Created hex token file: {}", hex_encoded);
// Use FileTokenStorage to read (should detect hex and decode)
let retrieved = storage.get_access_token().await?;
assert_eq!(
retrieved.as_deref(),
Some(test_token),
"Should successfully read hex-encoded token"
);
// Use FileTokenStorage to write (should upgrade to encrypted)
storage.store_access_token(test_token).await?;
// Read file directly, verify "ENC:" prefix
let file_contents = fs::read_to_string(&token_path)?;
assert!(
file_contents.starts_with("ENC:"),
"Token file should be upgraded to ENC: format, got: {}",
&file_contents[..10.min(file_contents.len())]
);
// Verify it's no longer hex
assert!(
!file_contents.chars().all(|c| c.is_ascii_hexdigit()),
"Token should no longer be in hex format"
);
// Verify token is still readable
let final_retrieved = storage.get_access_token().await?;
assert_eq!(
final_retrieved.as_deref(),
Some(test_token),
"Token should still be readable after upgrade"
);
// Cleanup
drop(storage);
Ok(())
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_file_storage_encryption_key_derivation() -> Result<()> {
let temp_dir = TempDir::new()?;
let test_token = "test_key_derivation_token";
// Store same token with first instance
{
let storage1 = FileTokenStorage::with_directory(temp_dir.path().to_path_buf())?;
storage1.store_access_token(test_token).await?;
drop(storage1);
}
let token_path = get_token_path(&temp_dir, "access");
let first_encrypted = fs::read_to_string(&token_path)?;
assert!(
first_encrypted.starts_with("ENC:"),
"First encryption should use ENC: format"
);
// Store same token with second instance
{
let storage2 = FileTokenStorage::with_directory(temp_dir.path().to_path_buf())?;
storage2.store_access_token(test_token).await?;
drop(storage2);
}
let second_encrypted = fs::read_to_string(&token_path)?;
assert!(
second_encrypted.starts_with("ENC:"),
"Second encryption should use ENC: format"
);
// Verify both can decrypt (same system key)
// Note: Encrypted values will differ due to random nonce, but both should decrypt correctly
let storage3 = FileTokenStorage::with_directory(temp_dir.path().to_path_buf())?;
let retrieved = storage3.get_access_token().await?;
assert_eq!(
retrieved.as_deref(),
Some(test_token),
"Both encryptions should decrypt to original token"
);
// Cleanup
drop(storage3);
Ok(())
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_file_storage_corrupted_encrypted_data() -> Result<()> {
let (storage, temp_dir) = create_test_storage()?;
let test_token = "test_corruption_token";
// Store encrypted token
storage.store_access_token(test_token).await?;
let token_path = get_token_path(&temp_dir, "access");
let original_contents = fs::read_to_string(&token_path)?;
// Manually corrupt the file (change bytes after "ENC:" prefix)
let corrupted = if original_contents.len() > 20 {
let mut chars: Vec<char> = original_contents.chars().collect();
// Corrupt a character in the middle of the encrypted data
let idx = original_contents.len() / 2;
chars[idx] = if chars[idx] == 'A' { 'B' } else { 'A' };
chars.into_iter().collect()
} else {
"ENC:corrupted_data".to_string()
};
fs::write(&token_path, corrupted)?;
// Attempt to read → should return error (GCM tag verification fails)
let result = storage.get_access_token().await;
assert!(
result.is_err(),
"Reading corrupted encrypted data should fail"
);
// Cleanup
drop(storage);
Ok(())
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_file_storage_wrong_format_prefix() -> Result<()> {
let (storage, temp_dir) = create_test_storage()?;
let token_path = get_token_path(&temp_dir, "access");
// Manually create file with "WRONG:" prefix
fs::write(&token_path, "WRONG:invalid_format_data")?;
// Attempt to read → should return error
let result = storage.get_access_token().await;
assert!(
result.is_err(),
"Reading token with wrong prefix should fail"
);
// Cleanup
drop(storage);
Ok(())
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_file_storage_empty_file() -> Result<()> {
let (storage, temp_dir) = create_test_storage()?;
let token_path = get_token_path(&temp_dir, "access");
// Create empty token file
fs::write(&token_path, "")?;
// Attempt to read → empty string decodes as empty hex (backward compatibility)
// This returns Some("") (empty token), which is technically valid
let result = storage.get_access_token().await?;
assert_eq!(
result,
Some(String::new()),
"Empty file decodes to empty token (hex backward compatibility)"
);
// Cleanup
drop(storage);
Ok(())
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_file_storage_both_tokens_encrypted() -> Result<()> {
let (storage, temp_dir) = create_test_storage()?;
let access_token = "test_access_token_both";
let refresh_token = "test_refresh_token_both";
// Store both access_token and refresh_token
storage.store_access_token(access_token).await?;
storage.store_refresh_token(refresh_token).await?;
// Verify both files use "ENC:" format
let access_path = get_token_path(&temp_dir, "access");
let refresh_path = get_token_path(&temp_dir, "refresh");
let access_contents = fs::read_to_string(&access_path)?;
let refresh_contents = fs::read_to_string(&refresh_path)?;
assert!(
access_contents.starts_with("ENC:"),
"Access token should use ENC: format"
);
assert!(
refresh_contents.starts_with("ENC:"),
"Refresh token should use ENC: format"
);
// Retrieve both tokens successfully
let retrieved_access = storage.get_access_token().await?;
let retrieved_refresh = storage.get_refresh_token().await?;
assert_eq!(
retrieved_access.as_deref(),
Some(access_token),
"Access token should match"
);
assert_eq!(
retrieved_refresh.as_deref(),
Some(refresh_token),
"Refresh token should match"
);
// Cleanup
drop(storage);
Ok(())
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn test_file_storage_encryption_idempotent() -> Result<()> {
let (storage, temp_dir) = create_test_storage()?;
let test_token = "test_idempotent_token";
let token_path = get_token_path(&temp_dir, "access");
// Store token
storage.store_access_token(test_token).await?;
// Read and re-store token 3 times
for i in 1..=3 {
let retrieved = storage.get_access_token().await?;
assert_eq!(
retrieved.as_deref(),
Some(test_token),
"Token should be readable on iteration {}",
i
);
storage.store_access_token(test_token).await?;
// Verify still encrypted
let contents = fs::read_to_string(&token_path)?;
assert!(
contents.starts_with("ENC:"),
"Token should remain encrypted after iteration {}",
i
);
}
// Verify final token is still readable
let final_retrieved = storage.get_access_token().await?;
assert_eq!(
final_retrieved.as_deref(),
Some(test_token),
"Final token should still be readable"
);
// Cleanup
drop(storage);
Ok(())
}