Atomic per feedback_no_partial_refactor — launch site + consumer floor
change + stale doc are three halves of the same contract:
(a) launch_loss_balance_controller wired into the per-step pipeline
after launch_sp5_pearl_2_budget (FLATNESS_BASE populated) and after
backward (grad_decomp pinned slots populated).
(b) compute_adaptive_budgets replaces hard floors (0.02/0.05) with
sentinel-aware bootstrap. The controller may now drive budgets near
zero when the structural target says so. IQN keeps BASE_IQN=0.11
structural floor (reference, can't be 0).
(c) All 4 stale "B4/G5" budget-eff docstrings rewritten to reflect
actual ownership: last_iqn_budget_eff (Pearl 2 flatness),
last_cql_budget_eff (SP7 controller), last_c51_budget_eff (SP7
controller), last_ens_budget_eff (Pearl 2 flatness +
sentinel-aware bootstrap). The previous claims (e.g.,
"0.10×(1−regime)×health") were never implemented; per
feedback_trust_code_not_docs, code wins over docs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
55b8457fdf