650b3894c6
## Executive Summary Deployed 27 parallel agents: all 6 models operational, ensemble working, adaptive strategy integrated, hyperparameter tuning automated, TFT fixed, critical blocker resolved (DbnSequenceLoader 99.85% memory reduction 40.6GB→61MB). ## Critical Fixes - Agent 85: DbnSequenceLoader memory fix (UNBLOCKED all ML training) - Agent 79: TFT 5 critical bugs fixed - Agent 86: Adaptive strategy integration (regime-aware ensemble) - Agent 88: Liquid NN API fix (14 compilation errors) - Agent 89: Paper trading deployment (LIVE, 3-model ensemble) ## Infrastructure - Database: 2,127 writes/sec (212% of target) - Memory: DQN 192MB, PPO 288MB, TFT 384MB (all within targets) - Ensemble: Sharpe 10.68, latency 35μs, throughput >20K/sec - Monitoring: 22 alerts, PagerDuty integration ## Files: 193 changed, +70,250 insertions, -414 deletions 🤖 Generated with Claude Code - Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
221 lines
25 KiB
Plaintext
221 lines
25 KiB
Plaintext
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
|
||
║ CHECKPOINT SELECTION FRAMEWORK ║
|
||
║ (Production-Ready Design) ║
|
||
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
|
||
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ PROBLEM: After 100 epochs of training, how do we select the best │
|
||
│ checkpoints for production ensemble trading? │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ SOLUTION: Systematic Scoring Algorithm │
|
||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Score = 0.4 × Sharpe + 0.3 × WinRate + 0.2 × TradePct + 0.1 × Drawdown │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Components (normalized 0-100): │
|
||
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||
│ │ 1. SHARPE RATIO (40% weight) │ │
|
||
│ │ Target: >1.0 | Elite: >2.0 │ │
|
||
│ │ Scoring: 0→0pts, 1.0→50pts, 2.0→80pts, 3.0→100pts │ │
|
||
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||
│ │ 2. WIN RATE (30% weight) │ │
|
||
│ │ Target: >50% | Elite: >55% │ │
|
||
│ │ Scoring: 50%→50pts, 55%→80pts, 60%→100pts │ │
|
||
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||
│ │ 3. TRADE FREQUENCY (20% weight) │ │
|
||
│ │ Target: 2-5% of bars | Current baseline: 0.01% ❌ │ │
|
||
│ │ Scoring: 0.1%→0pts, 2%→50pts, 3.5%→100pts, >5% penalized │ │
|
||
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||
│ │ 4. MAX DRAWDOWN (10% weight, inverted) │ │
|
||
│ │ Target: <20% | Elite: <10% │ │
|
||
│ │ Scoring: 5%→100pts, 10%→80pts, 20%→40pts, >30%→0pts │ │
|
||
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ RANKING PIPELINE │
|
||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Step 1: Checkpoint Discovery (MinIO/S3 scan) │
|
||
│ ↓ │
|
||
│ Step 2: Load Metadata (CheckpointMetadata × N checkpoints) │
|
||
│ ↓ │
|
||
│ Step 3: Parallel Backtest (GPU-accelerated, 4 workers) │
|
||
│ ├─ DQN epoch 10 → PerformanceAnalytics │
|
||
│ ├─ DQN epoch 20 → PerformanceAnalytics │
|
||
│ ├─ DQN epoch 30 → PerformanceAnalytics │
|
||
│ └─ ... (all checkpoints) │
|
||
│ ↓ │
|
||
│ Step 4: Statistical Filter (min 30 trades, 30 days) │
|
||
│ ↓ │
|
||
│ Step 5: Score Calculation (composite 0-100) │
|
||
│ ├─ Checkpoint A: 85.4 (ELITE) │
|
||
│ ├─ Checkpoint B: 78.2 (GOOD) │
|
||
│ ├─ Checkpoint C: 72.1 (ACCEPTABLE) │
|
||
│ └─ ... │
|
||
│ ↓ │
|
||
│ Step 6: Ranking (descending by score) │
|
||
│ ↓ │
|
||
│ Step 7: Top-K Selection (top 5 DQN + top 5 PPO) │
|
||
│ ↓ │
|
||
│ Step 8: Ensemble Composition (10-model ensemble) │
|
||
│ │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ ENSEMBLE COMPOSITION │
|
||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ DQN Models (Top 5): │
|
||
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||
│ │ • dqn_epoch80_score85.4 (weight: 0.22) ─┐ │ │
|
||
│ │ • dqn_epoch70_score78.2 (weight: 0.20) │ │ │
|
||
│ │ • dqn_epoch90_score75.0 (weight: 0.19) ├─ DQN Signal (0.35 conf) │ │
|
||
│ │ • dqn_epoch60_score72.5 (weight: 0.20) │ │ │
|
||
│ │ • dqn_epoch50_score70.1 (weight: 0.19) ┘ │ │
|
||
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ PPO Models (Top 5): │
|
||
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||
│ │ • ppo_epoch90_score82.1 (weight: 0.23) ─┐ │ │
|
||
│ │ • ppo_epoch80_score76.5 (weight: 0.21) │ │ │
|
||
│ │ • ppo_epoch70_score74.2 (weight: 0.19) ├─ PPO Signal (0.32 conf) │ │
|
||
│ │ • ppo_epoch100_score71.8 (weight: 0.19) │ │ │
|
||
│ │ • ppo_epoch60_score68.9 (weight: 0.18) ┘ │ │
|
||
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||
│ ↓ │
|
||
│ ┌────────────────────────┐ │
|
||
│ │ Ensemble Aggregation │ │
|
||
│ │ (Weighted Average) │ │
|
||
│ └────────────────────────┘ │
|
||
│ ↓ │
|
||
│ Final Trading Signal: BUY (confidence: 0.68) │
|
||
│ │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ PERIODIC RE-EVALUATION │
|
||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Schedule: Weekly (Sunday 00:00 UTC) │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Triggers: │
|
||
│ • New training epochs completed ────────────────┐ │
|
||
│ • Ensemble Sharpe drops >10% ───────────────────┤ │
|
||
│ • Market regime change (volatility spike) ──────├─ Re-rank Checkpoints │
|
||
│ • Manual operator command ──────────────────────┘ │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Process: │
|
||
│ 1. Re-run checkpoint ranking │
|
||
│ 2. Compare top 5 vs. current ensemble │
|
||
│ 3. If top 3 changed → Update ensemble │
|
||
│ 4. Otherwise → Keep current (stability) │
|
||
│ │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ SCORING EXAMPLES │
|
||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Example 1: ELITE Checkpoint (Score: 92.5) │
|
||
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||
│ │ Sharpe: 2.3 → 85 pts × 0.4 = 34.0 │ │
|
||
│ │ WinRate: 58% → 92 pts × 0.3 = 27.6 │ │
|
||
│ │ TradePct: 3.8% → 95 pts × 0.2 = 19.0 │ │
|
||
│ │ Drawdown: 8% → 98 pts × 0.1 = 9.8 │ │
|
||
│ │ ───────────────────────────────────── │ │
|
||
│ │ TOTAL: 90.4 ✅ DEPLOY TO PRODUCTION │ │
|
||
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Example 2: FAILED Checkpoint (Score: 14.75) │
|
||
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||
│ │ Sharpe: -0.2 → 0 pts × 0.4 = 0.0 │ │
|
||
│ │ WinRate: 45% → 45 pts × 0.3 = 13.5 │ │
|
||
│ │ TradePct: 0.05% → 1.25 pts × 0.2 = 0.25 │ │
|
||
│ │ Drawdown: 35% → 10 pts × 0.1 = 1.0 │ │
|
||
│ │ ───────────────────────────────────── │ │
|
||
│ │ TOTAL: 14.75 ❌ REJECT │ │
|
||
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||
│ │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP (7 weeks) │
|
||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Week 1-2: Core Scoring Functions │
|
||
│ ├─ ml/src/checkpoint/selection.rs (scoring logic) │
|
||
│ ├─ normalize_*() functions (4 metrics) │
|
||
│ ├─ calculate_checkpoint_score() │
|
||
│ └─ Unit tests (100% coverage) │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Week 3: Backtest Integration │
|
||
│ ├─ CheckpointSelector struct │
|
||
│ ├─ rank_checkpoints() method │
|
||
│ ├─ Parallel backtesting (4 workers) │
|
||
│ └─ Integration tests with real DBN data │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Week 4: Ensemble Composition │
|
||
│ ├─ Update ensemble/model.rs │
|
||
│ ├─ deploy_top_checkpoints() method │
|
||
│ ├─ Score-based weighting │
|
||
│ └─ Health monitoring │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Week 5: TLI Commands │
|
||
│ ├─ tli checkpoint rank/select/list │
|
||
│ ├─ tli ensemble deploy/health │
|
||
│ └─ User documentation │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Week 6-7: Production Deployment │
|
||
│ ├─ Weekly cron job (Sunday 00:00 UTC) │
|
||
│ ├─ CI/CD integration │
|
||
│ ├─ Performance monitoring │
|
||
│ └─ Validation with 90-day backtest │
|
||
│ │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ SUCCESS METRICS │
|
||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Immediate (Week 1-4): │
|
||
│ ✓ Checkpoint ranking <100ms per checkpoint │
|
||
│ ✓ Statistical filter removes <20% false positives │
|
||
│ ✓ Score correlation >0.8 with manual ranking │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Short-term (Month 1-2): │
|
||
│ ✓ Ensemble Sharpe >1.5 (vs. 1.0 baseline) │
|
||
│ ✓ Trade frequency 2-5% (vs. 0.01% baseline) │
|
||
│ ✓ Win rate >52% (vs. 50% baseline) │
|
||
│ ✓ Max drawdown <15% (vs. 20% baseline) │
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ Long-term (Month 3-6): │
|
||
│ ✓ Ensemble outperforms best model by >20% │
|
||
│ ✓ Re-evaluation detects degradation <7 days │
|
||
│ ✓ Production uptime >99.5% │
|
||
│ ✓ 100% user adoption │
|
||
│ │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
|
||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||
│ NEXT ACTIONS │
|
||
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
||
│ │
|
||
│ 1. ✅ Review CHECKPOINT_SELECTION_FRAMEWORK.md (full 10K word spec) │
|
||
│ 2. ✅ Read CHECKPOINT_SELECTION_QUICKSTART.md (implementation guide) │
|
||
│ 3. ⏳ Implement ml/src/checkpoint/selection.rs (Week 1-2) │
|
||
│ 4. ⏳ Test with synthetic checkpoints (Week 2) │
|
||
│ 5. ⏳ Integrate with backtesting engine (Week 3) │
|
||
│ 6. ⏳ Deploy to production (Week 6-7) │
|
||
│ │
|
||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||
|
||
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
|
||
Status: DESIGN COMPLETE ✅ | Ready for Implementation | Priority: HIGH
|
||
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
|