Files
foxhunt/services/trading_service/tests/ml_integration_e2e_test.rs
jgrusewski dd62f3fcfd refactor: eliminate candle from entire workspace — tests, examples, Cargo.toml
Final cleanup:
- 61 test files + 5 example files: candle imports replaced
- 8 testing/integration files: migrated to cudarc/ml-core types
- 3 services/trading_service test files: migrated
- Root Cargo.toml: candle-core, candle-nn removed from [workspace.dependencies]
- crates/ml/Cargo.toml: candle-nn dependency removed
- testing/e2e/Cargo.toml: candle-core dependency removed

Zero active candle_core/candle_nn/candle_optimisers code references remain.
Zero candle dependency declarations in any Cargo.toml.
Remaining "candle" strings are exclusively in doc comments.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-18 00:53:47 +01:00

595 lines
20 KiB
Rust

#![allow(unexpected_cfgs)]
#![cfg(feature = "__trading_service_integration")]
//! TDD E2E Integration Tests for ML Trading Pipeline
//!
//! **Mission**: Comprehensive end-to-end tests for ML trading pipeline using strict TDD methodology
//! **Methodology**: RED (Failing Tests) → GREEN (Minimal Implementation) → REFACTOR (Quality)
//!
//! ## Test Coverage
//! 1. End-to-end ML trading pipeline (data → features → prediction → order → tracking)
//! 2. Ensemble consensus voting with disagreement handling
//! 3. Fallback to rule-based on low confidence
//! 4. Multi-symbol trading with ML predictions
//! 5. Performance tracking (accuracy, Sharpe ratio)
//! 6. Risk limits override ML signals
//! 7. Model comparison across 4 models
//!
//! ## TDD Protocol
//! - **RED Phase**: All tests are `#[ignore]` and WILL FAIL
//! - **GREEN Phase**: Remove `#[ignore]` and implement minimal code to pass
//! - **REFACTOR Phase**: Improve code quality without changing behavior
#![allow(unused_imports)]
use anyhow::{anyhow, Result};
use ml_core::native_types::NativeDevice;
use common::{CommonError, OrderSide, OrderType};
use sqlx::PgPool;
use std::collections::HashMap;
use std::path::PathBuf;
use uuid::Uuid;
// Import trading service ML components
use trading_service::{
ml_performance_metrics::MLMetricsStore, Action, EnsembleCoordinator, Order,
PaperTradingExecutor, SignalSource, TradingSignal,
};
// Import rand for random testing
use rand;
// ============================================================================
// Test Infrastructure & Helper Functions
// ============================================================================
/// Create test database pool
async fn get_test_db_pool() -> PgPool {
let database_url = std::env::var("DATABASE_URL").unwrap_or_else(|_| {
"postgresql://foxhunt:foxhunt_dev_password@localhost:5432/foxhunt".to_string()
});
PgPool::connect(&database_url)
.await
.expect("Failed to connect to test database")
}
/// Create test ensemble coordinator with all 4 models (DQN, PPO, MAMBA2, TFT)
fn create_test_ensemble() -> std::sync::Arc<EnsembleCoordinator> {
use std::sync::Arc;
let coordinator = Arc::new(EnsembleCoordinator::new());
// Note: In real usage, models would be loaded and registered with the coordinator
// For tests, we create a minimal ensemble coordinator without loaded models
coordinator
}
/// Create test ensemble with low confidence (for fallback testing)
fn create_test_ensemble_low_confidence() -> std::sync::Arc<EnsembleCoordinator> {
// Same as above, but prediction will be mocked to return low confidence
create_test_ensemble()
}
/// Create single-model coordinator (for model comparison tests)
fn create_single_model_coordinator(model: &str) -> std::sync::Arc<EnsembleCoordinator> {
use std::sync::Arc;
let coordinator = Arc::new(EnsembleCoordinator::new());
// Note: In real usage, only the specified model would be loaded
// For tests, we create a minimal ensemble coordinator
coordinator
}
/// Load test OHLCV data (50 bars for feature extraction)
fn load_test_ohlcv_data(_symbol: &str, num_bars: usize) -> Vec<(f64, f64, f64, f64, f64)> {
// Generate synthetic OHLCV data with realistic pattern
let mut data = Vec::new();
let mut base_price = 4500.0; // ES.FUT starting price
for i in 0..num_bars {
let trend = (i as f64 * 0.1).sin(); // Add sine wave trend
let open = base_price + trend * 10.0;
let high = open + (i as f64 % 5.0) + 5.0;
let low = open - (i as f64 % 3.0) - 3.0;
let close = open + trend * 5.0;
let volume = 1000.0 + (i as f64 * 10.0);
data.push((open, high, low, close, volume));
base_price = close; // Next bar starts from previous close
}
data
}
/// Load test data with model disagreement (divergent trends)
fn load_test_data_with_disagreement() -> Vec<(f64, f64, f64, f64, f64)> {
// Generate data that creates model disagreement
let mut data = Vec::new();
let mut base_price = 4500.0;
for i in 0..50 {
// Create choppy market with no clear trend
let noise = ((i * 7) % 13) as f64 * 2.0 - 13.0;
let open = base_price + noise;
let high = open + (i as f64 % 3.0) + 3.0;
let low = open - (i as f64 % 2.0) - 2.0;
let close = open + noise * 0.3;
let volume = 1000.0 + (i as f64 * 5.0);
data.push((open, high, low, close, volume));
base_price = close;
}
data
}
// ============================================================================
// TEST 1: End-to-End ML Trading Pipeline (RED Phase)
// ============================================================================
#[tokio::test]
#[ignore = "RED: This test will fail until implementation is complete"]
async fn test_e2e_ml_trading_pipeline() {
// RED: End-to-end test from feature extraction to order execution
let pool = get_test_db_pool().await;
// 1. Load real market data
let market_data = load_test_ohlcv_data("ES.FUT", 50);
assert_eq!(market_data.len(), 50, "Need 50 OHLCV bars");
// 2. Create ML engine (feature extraction happens inside PaperTradingExecutor)
let ensemble = create_test_ensemble();
// Note: Feature extraction is now handled internally by PaperTradingExecutor
// using ml::features::UnifiedFeatureExtractor (256-dim features)
// 3. Execute paper trading order
let mut executor = PaperTradingExecutor::new_with_ml(pool.clone(), ensemble)
.await
.expect("Failed to create executor with ML");
// Generate ML signal (includes feature extraction internally)
let signal = executor
.generate_ml_signal(&market_data)
.await
.expect("Failed to generate ML signal");
assert!(
signal.confidence >= 0.0,
"Signal should have valid confidence"
);
// 4. Execute order based on signal
let order = executor
.execute_ml_signal(&signal, "ES.FUT")
.await
.expect("Failed to execute ML signal");
// Verify order created
assert_ne!(order.id, Uuid::nil());
assert_eq!(order.symbol, "ES.FUT");
// 5. Verify prediction stored in database
let prediction = sqlx::query!(
"SELECT * FROM ml_predictions WHERE order_id = $1 ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT 1",
order.id
)
.fetch_one(&pool)
.await
.expect("Failed to fetch prediction");
assert_eq!(prediction.symbol, "ES.FUT");
assert!((prediction.confidence as f64 - ensemble.confidence).abs() < 0.01);
// 6. Simulate outcome and record
executor
.record_outcome(order.id, 150.0)
.await
.expect("Failed to record outcome"); // +$150 profit
// 7. Verify performance metrics updated
let metrics_store = MLMetricsStore::new(pool);
let stats = metrics_store
.get_accuracy_stats("Ensemble")
.await
.expect("Failed to get accuracy stats");
assert_eq!(stats.total_predictions, 1);
assert_eq!(stats.correct_predictions, 1);
assert!((stats.accuracy - 1.0).abs() < 0.01);
}
// ============================================================================
// TEST 2: Ensemble Consensus Voting with Disagreement (RED Phase)
// ============================================================================
#[tokio::test]
#[ignore = "RED: This test will fail until implementation is complete"]
async fn test_ml_ensemble_consensus() {
// RED: Test ensemble voting with disagreement
let pool = get_test_db_pool().await;
let ensemble = create_test_ensemble();
// Load market data where models disagree
let market_data = load_test_data_with_disagreement();
let mut executor = PaperTradingExecutor::new_with_ml(pool, ensemble)
.await
.expect("Failed to create executor");
let signal = executor
.generate_ml_signal(&market_data)
.await
.expect("Failed to generate signal");
// Ensemble should use weighted voting
assert!(signal.model_votes.is_some(), "Should have model votes");
let votes = signal.model_votes.unwrap();
// At least 3/4 models should agree for high confidence
let action_val = signal.action.expect("Should have action") as usize;
let consensus_count = votes
.iter()
.filter(|(_, action, _)| *action == action_val)
.count();
if signal.confidence > 0.8 {
assert!(
consensus_count >= 3,
"High confidence requires 3+ model agreement, got {}/{}",
consensus_count,
votes.len()
);
}
}
// ============================================================================
// TEST 3: Fallback to Rule-Based on Low Confidence (RED Phase)
// ============================================================================
#[tokio::test]
#[ignore = "RED: This test will fail until implementation is complete"]
async fn test_ml_fallback_on_low_confidence() {
// RED: Test fallback to rule-based when confidence < 0.6
let pool = get_test_db_pool().await;
let ensemble = create_test_ensemble();
let mut executor = PaperTradingExecutor::new_with_ml(pool, ensemble)
.await
.expect("Failed to create executor");
// Disable ML to force fallback
executor.disable_ml().await;
let market_data = load_test_ohlcv_data("ES.FUT", 50);
let signal = executor
.generate_signal(&market_data)
.await
.expect("Failed to generate signal");
assert_eq!(
signal.source,
SignalSource::RuleBased,
"Source should be RuleBased"
);
assert!(signal.action.is_some(), "Should still generate signal");
}
// ============================================================================
// TEST 4: Multi-Symbol ML Trading (RED Phase)
// ============================================================================
#[tokio::test]
#[ignore = "RED: This test will fail until implementation is complete"]
async fn test_ml_multi_symbol_trading() {
// RED: Test ML predictions for multiple symbols
let pool = get_test_db_pool().await;
let ensemble = create_test_ensemble();
let mut executor = PaperTradingExecutor::new_with_ml(pool.clone(), ensemble)
.await
.expect("Failed to create executor");
let symbols = vec!["ES.FUT", "NQ.FUT", "ZN.FUT"];
for symbol in &symbols {
let market_data = load_test_ohlcv_data(symbol, 50);
let signal = executor
.generate_ml_signal(&market_data)
.await
.expect("Failed to generate signal");
if signal.confidence >= 0.6 {
let order = executor
.execute_ml_signal(&signal, symbol)
.await
.expect("Failed to execute signal");
assert_eq!(order.symbol, *symbol);
}
}
// Verify predictions for all symbols
let predictions =
sqlx::query!("SELECT symbol, COUNT(*) as count FROM ml_predictions GROUP BY symbol")
.fetch_all(&pool)
.await
.expect("Failed to fetch predictions");
assert!(
predictions.len() >= 1,
"At least 1 symbol should have predictions"
);
}
// ============================================================================
// TEST 5: ML Performance Tracking - Accuracy Calculation (RED Phase)
// ============================================================================
#[tokio::test]
#[ignore = "RED: This test will fail until implementation is complete"]
async fn test_ml_performance_tracking_accuracy() {
// RED: Test accuracy calculation with mixed outcomes
let pool = get_test_db_pool().await;
let ensemble = create_test_ensemble();
let mut executor = PaperTradingExecutor::new_with_ml(pool.clone(), ensemble)
.await
.expect("Failed to create executor");
// Execute 10 ML trades
for i in 0..10 {
let market_data = load_test_ohlcv_data("ES.FUT", 50);
let signal = executor
.generate_ml_signal(&market_data)
.await
.expect("Failed to generate signal");
let order = executor
.execute_ml_signal(&signal, "ES.FUT")
.await
.expect("Failed to execute signal");
// Record outcome: 7 correct, 3 incorrect
let pnl = if i < 7 { 100.0 } else { -50.0 };
executor
.record_outcome(order.id, pnl)
.await
.expect("Failed to record outcome");
}
// Verify accuracy metrics
let metrics_store = MLMetricsStore::new(pool);
let stats = metrics_store
.get_accuracy_stats("Ensemble")
.await
.expect("Failed to get accuracy stats");
assert_eq!(stats.total_predictions, 10);
assert_eq!(stats.correct_predictions, 7);
assert!((stats.accuracy - 0.7).abs() < 0.01);
}
// ============================================================================
// TEST 6: Sharpe Ratio Calculation (RED Phase)
// ============================================================================
#[tokio::test]
#[ignore = "RED: This test will fail until implementation is complete"]
async fn test_ml_sharpe_ratio_calculation() {
// RED: Test Sharpe ratio with profit/loss series
let pool = get_test_db_pool().await;
let ensemble = create_test_ensemble();
let mut executor = PaperTradingExecutor::new_with_ml(pool.clone(), ensemble)
.await
.expect("Failed to create executor");
// Execute trades with varying P&L
let pnls = vec![100.0, -50.0, 200.0, -30.0, 150.0, 80.0, -20.0, 120.0];
for pnl in pnls {
let market_data = load_test_ohlcv_data("ES.FUT", 50);
let signal = executor
.generate_ml_signal(&market_data)
.await
.expect("Failed to generate signal");
let order = executor
.execute_ml_signal(&signal, "ES.FUT")
.await
.expect("Failed to execute signal");
executor
.record_outcome(order.id, pnl)
.await
.expect("Failed to record outcome");
}
// Calculate Sharpe ratio
let metrics_store = MLMetricsStore::new(pool);
let sharpe = metrics_store
.calculate_sharpe_ratio("Ensemble")
.await
.expect("Failed to calculate Sharpe ratio");
// Sharpe > 0 means profitable with controlled risk
assert!(sharpe > 0.0, "Sharpe ratio should be positive");
// Annualized Sharpe > 1.0 is good
if sharpe > 1.0 {
println!("✅ Good Sharpe ratio: {:.2}", sharpe);
}
}
// ============================================================================
// TEST 7: Risk Limits Override ML Signals (RED Phase)
// ============================================================================
#[tokio::test]
#[ignore = "RED: This test will fail until implementation is complete"]
async fn test_ml_risk_limits_override() {
// RED: Test that risk limits override ML signals
let pool = get_test_db_pool().await;
let ensemble = create_test_ensemble();
let mut executor = PaperTradingExecutor::new_with_ml(pool, ensemble)
.await
.expect("Failed to create executor");
// Set strict position limit
executor
.set_position_limit("ES.FUT", 5)
.await
.expect("Failed to set position limit");
// Execute 5 trades (hit limit)
for _ in 0..5 {
let market_data = load_test_ohlcv_data("ES.FUT", 50);
let signal = executor
.generate_ml_signal(&market_data)
.await
.expect("Failed to generate signal");
executor
.execute_ml_signal(&signal, "ES.FUT")
.await
.expect("Failed to execute signal");
}
// 6th trade should be rejected
let market_data = load_test_ohlcv_data("ES.FUT", 50);
let signal = executor
.generate_ml_signal(&market_data)
.await
.expect("Failed to generate signal");
let result = executor.execute_ml_signal(&signal, "ES.FUT").await;
assert!(
result.is_err(),
"6th trade should be rejected due to position limit"
);
let error_msg = result.unwrap_err().to_string();
assert!(
error_msg.to_lowercase().contains("position") || error_msg.to_lowercase().contains("limit"),
"Error should mention position limit, got: {}",
error_msg
);
}
// ============================================================================
// TEST 8: Model Comparison Across 4 Models (RED Phase)
// ============================================================================
#[tokio::test]
#[ignore = "RED: This test will fail until implementation is complete"]
async fn test_ml_model_comparison() {
// RED: Test comparing performance across 4 models
let pool = get_test_db_pool().await;
// Execute trades with each model individually
for model in &["DQN", "PPO", "MAMBA2", "TFT"] {
let ensemble = create_single_model_coordinator(model);
let mut executor = PaperTradingExecutor::new_with_ml(pool.clone(), ensemble)
.await
.expect("Failed to create executor");
for _ in 0..5 {
let market_data = load_test_ohlcv_data("ES.FUT", 50);
let signal = executor
.generate_ml_signal(&market_data)
.await
.expect("Failed to generate signal");
let order = executor
.execute_ml_signal(&signal, "ES.FUT")
.await
.expect("Failed to execute signal");
// Random outcome for testing
let pnl = if rand::random::<f64>() > 0.5 {
100.0
} else {
-50.0
};
executor
.record_outcome(order.id, pnl)
.await
.expect("Failed to record outcome");
}
}
// Compare model performance
let metrics_store = MLMetricsStore::new(pool);
let comparison = metrics_store
.compare_model_accuracy()
.await
.expect("Failed to compare model accuracy");
assert_eq!(comparison.len(), 4, "Should have all 4 models");
// Models should be ranked by accuracy
for i in 1..comparison.len() {
assert!(
comparison[i - 1].1 >= comparison[i].1,
"Models should be sorted by accuracy"
);
}
}
// ============================================================================
// TEST 9: Position Sizing Based on Confidence (RED Phase)
// ============================================================================
#[tokio::test]
#[ignore = "RED: This test will fail until implementation is complete"]
async fn test_position_sizing_confidence_mapping() {
// RED: Test position sizing scales with confidence
let pool = get_test_db_pool().await;
let ensemble = create_test_ensemble();
let executor = PaperTradingExecutor::new_with_ml(pool, ensemble)
.await
.expect("Failed to create executor");
use trading_service::paper_trading_executor::{Action, SignalSource, TradingSignal};
// High confidence signal (0.9)
let high_conf_signal = TradingSignal {
action: Some(Action::Buy),
confidence: 0.9,
source: SignalSource::ML,
model_votes: None,
};
// Low confidence signal (0.6)
let low_conf_signal = TradingSignal {
action: Some(Action::Buy),
confidence: 0.6,
source: SignalSource::ML,
model_votes: None,
};
// Convert both to orders
let high_conf_order = executor
.convert_signal_to_order(&high_conf_signal, "ES.FUT")
.await
.expect("High confidence order failed");
let low_conf_order = executor
.convert_signal_to_order(&low_conf_signal, "ES.FUT")
.await
.expect("Low confidence order failed");
// Higher confidence should result in larger position
assert!(
high_conf_order.quantity > low_conf_order.quantity,
"High confidence ({}) should have larger position than low confidence ({})",
high_conf_order.quantity,
low_conf_order.quantity
);
}