User directive: "we don't remove functionality at all, we fix what's
broken". Standing rule captured in
~/.claude/projects/-home-jgrusewski-Work-foxhunt/memory/feedback_no_functionality_removal.md.
Phase 2 plan reframed:
* Task 2.3 (R5 micro-reward): was DELETE; now FIX — either (a) set a
non-zero scale that delivers real signal, or (b) document why it's
intentionally disabled while preserving the code path.
* Task 2.4 (R6 loss-aversion): unchanged — the relocation to C51
Bellman target is consolidation, not removal. Invariant preserved.
* Task 2.6 (E4 entropy-reg): was DELETE-CANDIDATE; now TUNE — if the
signal doesn't reach magnitude, re-route it rather than remove.
* Task 2.7 (C4 grad-clip): was DELETE-CANDIDATE; now
KEEP-AND-DOCUMENT — gradient clipping is a safety feature; run the
ablation for diagnostic, not for removal.
* H9 delete-magnitude-branch fallback: rejected permanently. On
magnitude convergence failure the fallback is per-magnitude reward
shaping / per-bin advantage weighting / curriculum / state enrichment.
Task 2.5 wiring-bug sweep unchanged (correctness fixes, not removal).
This commit updates only the planning narrative. Task execution hasn't
started on 2.3/2.6/2.7 yet, so no code changes required here. When
those tasks run, they will implement the fix-paths, not the
delete-paths.
d1068de2b8