fixup(sp17-pp.2): lock-test producer constants for symmetry

Per code-quality review of a225926e5: ADVANTAGE_CLIP_SAFETY_FACTOR
(1.5) and ADVANTAGE_CLIP_EMA_ALPHA (0.01) were declared `pub` but not
asserted in the sp17_dueling_slot_layout_locked test. All other named
constants in the SP17 ISV block are pinned by the lock test; this
extends the same coverage to the two producer constants that the
Phase 5 advantage_clip_bound producer kernel will consume.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

crates/ml/src/cuda_pipeline/sp14_isv_slots.rs

@@ -1042,6 +1042,9 @@ mod tests {
         // Category-1 dimensional safety bounds per `feedback_isv_for_adaptive_bounds`.
         assert_eq!(ADVANTAGE_CLIP_BOUND_MIN, 0.1);
         assert_eq!(ADVANTAGE_CLIP_BOUND_MAX, 100.0);
+        // Producer constants (consumed by Phase 5 advantage_clip_bound producer kernel).
+        assert_eq!(ADVANTAGE_CLIP_SAFETY_FACTOR, 1.5);
+        assert_eq!(ADVANTAGE_CLIP_EMA_ALPHA, 0.01);
     }
 
     #[test]

docs/dqn-wire-up-audit.md

@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
 
 Allocates the 9 ISV slots that drive the SP17 dueling-Q identifiability diagnostic chain. **Additive infrastructure only — no consumer wiring in this commit.** The Phase 1 mean-centering producer (atomic across `compute_expected_q` + `c51_loss` + `c51_grad` + `mag_concat_qdir`) lands in the next 4 commits per `feedback_no_partial_refactor`.
 
+**Fixup (post-quality-review):** `ADVANTAGE_CLIP_SAFETY_FACTOR` and `ADVANTAGE_CLIP_EMA_ALPHA` added to `sp17_dueling_slot_layout_locked` for assertion-coverage symmetry with the other named constants in the SP17 block. No code-path or contract change.
+
 ### Why SP17
 
 The codebase has separate V-head (`on_v_logits_buf`) and per-branch A-head (`on_b_logits_buf`) buffers, but combines them naively as `logit = v_row[z] + adv_a[z]` — no `A − mean_a A` subtraction. This is over-parameterization without identifiability: the optimizer is mathematically free to learn the degenerate `V ≈ Q(Flat), A ≈ Q(a) − Q(Flat)` decomposition, which IS the Q(Flat) attractor we have been fighting since SP11. The fix is small and surgical: insert mean-zero projection at 4 existing aggregation sites (Phase 1-3). PP.2 lays the ISV slot infrastructure for the diagnostics that observe whether the projection is doing real work.