3 omnisearch researchers + clean PEAD test answer 'why does AI4Finance find what we cant': they dont. FinRL flagship (Sharpe 1.30) = single-split, slippage-free, no-deflation, bull-market, survivorship, hand-coded crash rule; their own people (Gort/Liu AAAI'23) published the overfitting rebuttal; zero live track record. ML-trading decays 73%+ backtest->live, faster for complexity. PEAD tested properly (real Nasdaq surprises x DBEQ, leak-free, 23bp cost, OOS): full-sample looked good (20d +0.29% t=2.9) but pure in-sample bull-beta -> OOS NEGATIVE every horizon; surprise-size signature fails. Strongest classic anomaly dies OOS. Untested real pulse left: prediction markets (uncorrelated). Tooling: fetch_earnings.py, pead_real.py, dbeq_symbology resolved (17605 tickers). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.5 KiB
3.5 KiB