jgrusewski 0171c8c0ea fix(ml-alpha): asymmetric lambda clamp [1.0, 2.0] — boost-only ISV
3-fold A/B CV (5d42ab0e9 vs eb51c0f9c, same data splits) showed
ISV winning the aggregate (+0.9pt mean_auc, +1.8pt h6000 across
folds) but FOLD-2 regressed -1.3pt on h6000 while folds 0 and 1
both gained (+2.0pt and +4.6pt respectively).

Per-fold per-horizon breakdown showed exactly the failure mode:
  Fold 0 (val 2025-Q1): h6000 no-ISV 0.714 → ISV 0.734 (+2.0pt)
  Fold 1 (val 2025-Q2): h6000 no-ISV 0.682 → ISV 0.728 (+4.6pt)
  Fold 2 (val 2025-Q3): h6000 no-ISV 0.698 → ISV 0.685 (-1.3pt)

In folds 0 and 1, h6000 was the hardest horizon — ISV correctly
boosted it (lambda > 1). In fold 2 the regime made h6000 relatively
easy at no-ISV (0.698 vs the worst horizon at ~0.70). ISV's
SYMMETRIC clamp [0.5, 2.0] then computed ratio = ema_h6000 /
mean_ema < 1 and DEMOTED h6000's trunk-gradient pull below uniform,
starving further learning on the horizon we actually deploy.

Per `pearl_audit_unboundedness_for_implicit_asymmetry.md`: when a
control signal serves an asymmetric goal (here: we never want to
de-prioritize h6000, only ever boost it OR leave it alone), encode
that asymmetry in the clamp. LAMBDA_FLOOR 0.5 → 1.0 makes the
controller boost-only: under-trained horizons get more pull, but
no horizon is ever demoted below its uniform contribution.

Expected effect with asymmetric clamp:
  - Fold 0 and 1: lambda for the hardest horizon stays at 2.0
    (ceiling-clamped), trunk-gradient lift unchanged. The gains
    +2.0pt and +4.6pt should hold.
  - Fold 2: h6000's lambda was being demoted to ~0.74; now floored
    at 1.0 — the -1.3pt h6000 regression should disappear. h6000
    trains at uniform weight, recovering toward 0.698.
  - Cross-fold mean projected: ~0.724 (+1.3pt vs no-ISV).

Test update: `horizon_ema_and_lambda_track_after_training` now
asserts lambda ∈ [1.0, 2.0] (the asymmetric envelope) and
lambda mean ∈ [1.0, 2.0] (boost-only guarantee). Observed values
on the test data: lambda = [1.13, 1.00, 1.08, 1.08, 1.00] — the
two easier horizons correctly floor at 1.00 instead of demoting.

Validation: 7 perception_overfit tests pass, synthetic overfit
trajectory unchanged (0.36 → 0.0006), 26 ml-alpha lib + 23
integration tests green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-17 19:16:37 +02:00

Foxhunt

Production HFT trading system in Rust.

Architecture

The workspace contains 32 crates organized as follows:

Core Libraries (16)

Crate Purpose
trading_engine Order processing, FIX 4.4, IB TWS, SIMD, RDTSC timing
risk VaR, Kelly, circuit breakers, kill switches, compliance
risk-data Risk data types and shared structures
trading-data Trading data types
ml DQN Rainbow, PPO, TFT, Mamba2, ensemble inference
ml-data ML data types and feature definitions
data Market data ingestion and storage
backtesting Replay engine, strategy tester
adaptive-strategy Ensemble execution, microstructure analysis
common Shared types, resilience, error handling
storage S3 and local model storage
model_loader Model serialization and loading
market-data Market data feed handlers
database PostgreSQL access layer (SQLx)
config Configuration management
tli CLI commands and tooling

Services (8)

Service Purpose
backtesting_service gRPC backtesting service
broker_gateway_service FIX routing, broker connectivity
trading_service Core trading operations
ml_training_service Model training orchestration
data_acquisition_service Market data acquisition
trading_agent_service Autonomous trading agents
api_gateway gRPC API gateway with auth
web-gateway Axum REST + WebSocket gateway

Frontend

web-dashboard/ -- React 19 + TypeScript + Vite + TradingView charts.

Building

# Check compilation (no PostgreSQL required)
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo check --workspace

# Run tests for a specific crate
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo test -p <crate> --lib

# Clippy
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo clippy --workspace

ML Models

Four production model architectures on Candle v0.9.1 with CUDA:

  • DQN Rainbow -- Deep Q-Network with prioritized replay, dueling heads, noisy nets
  • PPO -- Proximal Policy Optimization with GAE and LSTM policies
  • TFT -- Temporal Fusion Transformer for multi-horizon forecasting
  • Mamba2 -- State space model for sequence prediction

Each model has a standalone trainer and a UnifiedTrainable adapter for the hyperopt pipeline.

Infrastructure

  • Git: Gitea at git.fxhnt.ai (Tailscale-only), Scaleway DEV1-S
  • Observability: OpenTelemetry OTLP (env OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT)
  • Database: PostgreSQL with SQLx offline mode for CI

License

Proprietary. All rights reserved.

Description
No description provided
Readme 849 MiB
Languages
Rust 88.2%
Cuda 7.7%
Python 1.3%
Shell 1.1%
PLpgSQL 0.8%
Other 0.8%