jgrusewski 0e17fd4f2d diag(crt-2): per-horizon alpha-input EMA test — hypothesis investigation
Driven by ffr59 (commit b44a97ff9) findings: all 5 horizons flip
direction every 2.5 events; win rate flat 24% across conviction; mean
PnL anti-correlated with conviction. Hypothesis: per-event alpha output
is high-frequency noise on top of a slower signal. If true, smoothing
input alpha BEFORE the conviction formula should reduce direction flips
and recover signal.

Adds Wiener-α adaptive EMA on raw alpha_probs[h] for each horizon,
applied BEFORE the multi-horizon conviction formula. Floor at 0.1
(stronger than the 0.4 floor on the output-side conviction EMA — this
tests whether INPUT smoothing has different impact than OUTPUT smoothing).

Three new device slots:
  - alpha_ema_per_b_per_h (per-horizon EMA state)
  - alpha_diff_var_per_b_per_h (variance of changes)
  - alpha_sample_var_per_b_per_h (variance of value)

The CRT.diag Group A direction-flip counter still reads RAW alpha_probs
so we have a head-to-head comparison: raw flip rate vs smoothed flip rate.
Group E adds the smoothed-direction counter + mean run length.

End-of-run log adds one line per horizon:
  crt_diag h<X> smoothed: flips=Y mean_run_len=Z events (vs raw F / M)

If smoothed mean_run_len >> raw mean_run_len: hypothesis is RIGHT, the
input had signal under the noise. Next step would be to make this an
operational EMA in the controller.

If smoothed and raw are similar: hypothesis is WRONG, per-event output
is genuinely noisy. Next step would be to investigate model training
(horizon collapse) OR the AUC=0.66 measurement definition.

Either way, definitive result from one smoke run.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-20 22:34:35 +02:00

Foxhunt

Production HFT trading system in Rust.

Architecture

The workspace contains 32 crates organized as follows:

Core Libraries (16)

Crate Purpose
trading_engine Order processing, FIX 4.4, IB TWS, SIMD, RDTSC timing
risk VaR, Kelly, circuit breakers, kill switches, compliance
risk-data Risk data types and shared structures
trading-data Trading data types
ml DQN Rainbow, PPO, TFT, Mamba2, ensemble inference
ml-data ML data types and feature definitions
data Market data ingestion and storage
backtesting Replay engine, strategy tester
adaptive-strategy Ensemble execution, microstructure analysis
common Shared types, resilience, error handling
storage S3 and local model storage
model_loader Model serialization and loading
market-data Market data feed handlers
database PostgreSQL access layer (SQLx)
config Configuration management
tli CLI commands and tooling

Services (8)

Service Purpose
backtesting_service gRPC backtesting service
broker_gateway_service FIX routing, broker connectivity
trading_service Core trading operations
ml_training_service Model training orchestration
data_acquisition_service Market data acquisition
trading_agent_service Autonomous trading agents
api_gateway gRPC API gateway with auth
web-gateway Axum REST + WebSocket gateway

Frontend

web-dashboard/ -- React 19 + TypeScript + Vite + TradingView charts.

Building

# Check compilation (no PostgreSQL required)
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo check --workspace

# Run tests for a specific crate
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo test -p <crate> --lib

# Clippy
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo clippy --workspace

ML Models

Four production model architectures on Candle v0.9.1 with CUDA:

  • DQN Rainbow -- Deep Q-Network with prioritized replay, dueling heads, noisy nets
  • PPO -- Proximal Policy Optimization with GAE and LSTM policies
  • TFT -- Temporal Fusion Transformer for multi-horizon forecasting
  • Mamba2 -- State space model for sequence prediction

Each model has a standalone trainer and a UnifiedTrainable adapter for the hyperopt pipeline.

Infrastructure

  • Git: Gitea at git.fxhnt.ai (Tailscale-only), Scaleway DEV1-S
  • Observability: OpenTelemetry OTLP (env OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT)
  • Database: PostgreSQL with SQLx offline mode for CI

License

Proprietary. All rights reserved.

Description
No description provided
Readme 849 MiB
Languages
Rust 88.2%
Cuda 7.7%
Python 1.3%
Shell 1.1%
PLpgSQL 0.8%
Other 0.8%