foxhunt/docs/isv-slots.md

# ISV Slot Allocation Registry

**Source of truth for ISV bus slot allocations.** Every slot has a named constant in `gpu_dqn_trainer.rs`. This doc is the cross-reference.

**Design: layout fingerprint, not schema version.** ISV[115..117) carries a
compile-time structural hash of the slot layout. Checkpoint load is
fail-fast; no migration functions exist. Backward compat is structurally
unwritable (there is no ordered version space to pair migrations against).
See spec §4.A.2.

**Tail placement rationale:** The fingerprint occupies the current tail (`[115..117)`) rather
than the head because `isv_signals[0]` and `isv_signals[1]` are actively written
by `isv_signal_update` (Q-drift EMA and gradient-norm EMA respectively). Inserting
at the head would displace those live signals and require shifting every upstream
literal in `experience_kernels.cu`. The fingerprint moves to the new tail each time
new slots are appended to the bus.

**Current `ISV_TOTAL_DIM`:** 360 (post-SP11 Task A0 reservation extending the bus from 340 → 360 with 20 contiguous reward-subsystem-controller slots at `[340..360)`; SP11 A0 slots are reservation-only and zero-initialized until A1/A2/Layer-B land producers and atomic consumer migration — see the SP11 section at the bottom of this file). Earlier expansions: SP4 Task A1 (131 → 171, 40 slots at `[131..171)`); SP5 Task A0 (173 → 286, 110 slots; producer wave landed across A1–A8 + Layer D); SP6/SP7/SP8/SP9/SP10 incremental allocations onto the SP5 block (286 → 340). Producers and consumers for slots `[0..131)` are wired across Plan 1, Plan 2 (Task 1 C.1, Task 3 D.2 per-branch gamma, Task 6C D.8 TLOB), Plan 3 (Task 1 C.2 reward-component EMAs, Task 3 B.2 trade-attempt novelty, Task 4 B.4 readiness-EMA, Task 7 C.3 state-distribution KL, Task 8 B.3 GPU-only seed warm-start, Task 9 C.5 CQL α ramp), Plan 4 (Task 5 Mode A E.5 attention-focus EMAs, follow-up target-drift EMAs, Task 6 C.A multi-task aux head EMAs, Task 6 / Plan 5 follow-up label-scale EMA, MoE expert-utilisation + gate-entropy EMAs + adaptive-lambda controller, Q-drift-rate diagnostic, fold warmup factor).

| Index | Name constant | Type | Producer | Consumers | Reset-category | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [0] | `SLOT_0_Q_DRIFT` (seed only) | f32 | isv_signal_update | ISV encoder | FoldReset | `isv_signals[0]` = (q_mean − q_ema) / max(|q_ema|, 0.1) |
| [1] | `SLOT_1_GRAD_NORM_EMA` (seed only) | f32 | isv_signal_update | ISV encoder | FoldReset | EMA of sqrt(grad_norm²) |
| [2] | `SLOT_2_TD_ERR_EMA` (seed only) | f32 | isv_signal_update | ISV encoder | FoldReset | EMA of TD-error scalar |
| [3] | `SLOT_3_ENS_VAR_EMA` (seed only) | f32 | isv_signal_update | ISV encoder | FoldReset | C51 Q-distribution variance EMA (batch-mean atom-spread) |
| [4] | `SLOT_4_ENS_VAR_VEL` (seed only) | f32 | isv_signal_update | ISV encoder | FoldReset | Delta of slot 3 (variance velocity) |
| [5] | `SLOT_5_REWARD_EMA` (seed only) | f32 | isv_signal_update | ISV encoder | FoldReset | EMA of per-batch mean reward |
| [6] | `SLOT_6_ATOM_UTIL_EMA` (seed only) | f32 | isv_signal_update | ISV encoder | FoldReset | EMA of atom utilization fraction |
| [7] | `SLOT_7_LOSS_EMA` (seed only) | f32 | isv_signal_update | ISV encoder | FoldReset | EMA of total training loss |
| [8] | `SLOT_8_ADX_EMA` (seed only) | f32 | isv_signal_update | ISV encoder | FoldReset | Batch-mean ADX EMA (regime velocity indicator) |
| [9] | `SLOT_9_REGIME_DISAGREE` (seed only) | f32 | isv_signal_update | ISV encoder | FoldReset | |norm(ADX) − norm(CUSUM)| disagreement signal |
| [10] | `SLOT_10_REGIME_VEL_EMA` (seed only) | f32 | isv_signal_update | ISV encoder | FoldReset | EMA of regime transition velocity (ADX + CUSUM delta) |
| [11] | `SLOT_11_REGIME_STABILITY` (seed only) | f32 | isv_signal_update | ISV encoder | FoldReset | 1 − sigmoid(5 × regime_vel); high = stable regime |
| [12] | `LEARNING_HEALTH_INDEX` | f32 | isv_signal_update | many | FoldReset | health score ∈ [0, 1] |
| [13..17) | `Q_MAG_MEAN_*_INDEX` | f32 | q_mag_means_reduce | c51 kernels | FoldReset | Quarter/Half/Full mag Q-mean EMAs + \|Q\| ref |
| [17..22) | `Q_DIR_MEAN_*_INDEX` | f32 | q_dir_means_reduce | c51 kernels | FoldReset | Short/Hold/Long/Flat dir Q-mean EMAs + \|Q\| ref |
| [22] | `SHARPE_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | training_loop host | isv_signal_update | FoldReset | Training Sharpe EMA |
| [23..31) | `V_{CENTER,HALF}_{DIR,MAG,ORD,URG}_INDEX` | f32 | update_eval_v_range | adaptive_atoms, warm_start | FoldReset | Per-branch Q-support |
| [31..35) | `GRAD_NORM_TARGET_*_INDEX` | f32 | grad_balance_isv_update | branch_grad_rescale | SoftReset(decay_bars=500) | Per-branch grad-norm target |
| [35] | `GRAD_SCALE_LIMIT_INDEX` | f32 | grad_balance_isv_update | branch_grad_rescale | SoftReset(decay_bars=500) | Scale clamp limit |
| [36] | `IQL_BRANCH_SCALE_FLOOR_INDEX` | f32 | construct (static) | iql_per_branch_advantage | SchemaContract | Per-sample branch_scales floor; safety bound |
| [37..39) | (gap — fingerprint moved to tail) | — | — | — | — | Previously held the fingerprint pair; promoted across the Plan 1 C.6 / Plan 3 / Plan 4 / Plan 5 expansions to its current location at [115..117). Slots unused; zero-filled. |
| [39] | `EPOCH_IDX_INDEX` | f32 (int cast) | CPU epoch-loop (follow-up task) | GPU adaptive kernels | FoldReset | Current epoch index; 0 at construction, CPU writes at each epoch boundary |
| [40] | `TOTAL_EPOCHS_INDEX` | f32 (int cast) | construct (CPU static) | GPU adaptive kernels | SchemaContract | Total epoch count for this run; written at construction from `config.total_epochs` |
| [41] | `EPSILON_EFF_INDEX` | f32 | GPU epsilon-adaptive kernel (follow-up) | epsilon-greedy action select | FoldReset | Effective epsilon; 0 at construction; GPU fills each step |
| [42] | `TAU_EFF_INDEX` | f32 | GPU tau-adaptive kernel (follow-up) | target-net Polyak update | FoldReset | Effective tau; 0 at construction; GPU fills each step |
| [43] | `GAMMA_DIR_EFF_INDEX` | f32 | GPU per_branch_gamma_update kernel (Plan 2 D.2) | c51_loss_batched, iql_compute_per_sample_support | FoldReset | Direction-branch gamma; base=0.92, max=0.99; GPU fills each epoch boundary |
| [44] | `GAMMA_MAG_EFF_INDEX` | f32 | GPU per_branch_gamma_update kernel (Plan 2 D.2) | c51_loss_batched, iql_compute_per_sample_support | FoldReset | Magnitude-branch gamma; base=0.88, max=0.95 |
| [45] | `GAMMA_ORD_EFF_INDEX` | f32 | GPU per_branch_gamma_update kernel (Plan 2 D.2) | c51_loss_batched, iql_compute_per_sample_support | FoldReset | Order-branch gamma; base=0.85, max=0.93 |
| [46] | `GAMMA_URG_EFF_INDEX` | f32 | GPU per_branch_gamma_update kernel (Plan 2 D.2) | c51_loss_batched, iql_compute_per_sample_support | FoldReset | Urgency-branch gamma; base=0.80, max=0.90 |
| [47] | `KELLY_CAP_EFF_INDEX` | f32 | GPU kelly-cap-adaptive kernel (Plan 1 Task 11) | experience_env_step | FoldReset | Effective Kelly cap; 0 at construction; GPU fills each step |
| [48] | `CQL_ALPHA_INDEX` | f32 | construct (CPU static) | CQL adaptive formula in Rust | SchemaContract | CQL pessimism base coefficient; written from `config.cql_alpha`; read in `compute_cql_logit_gradients` |
| [49] | `PLAN_THRESHOLD_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `plan_threshold_update` kernel (Plan 3 B.4) | `experience_kernels.cu`, `backtest_plan_kernel.cu` | FoldReset | Plan-MLP activation threshold; producer upgraded from static constructor write to GPU kernel by Plan 3 Task 4 B.4. Cold-start 0.5f preserved. Kernel writes `max(0.1, 0.5 × ISV[READINESS_EMA_INDEX=75])` each epoch. Consumers (4 sites in `experience_kernels.cu` + 1 in `backtest_plan_kernel.cu`) unchanged — still read via `ISV_PLAN_THRESHOLD_IDX`. |
| [50] | `Q_P05_DIR_INDEX` | f32 | q_quantile_reduce GPU kernel (cold-path per-epoch) | update_eval_v_range | FoldReset | Direction-branch 5th-percentile Q EMA. Bootstrap: v_min. |
| [51] | `Q_P05_MAG_INDEX` | f32 | q_quantile_reduce | update_eval_v_range | FoldReset | Magnitude-branch 5th-percentile Q EMA. Bootstrap: v_min. |
| [52] | `Q_P05_ORD_INDEX` | f32 | q_quantile_reduce | update_eval_v_range | FoldReset | Order-branch 5th-percentile Q EMA. Bootstrap: v_min. |
| [53] | `Q_P05_URG_INDEX` | f32 | q_quantile_reduce | update_eval_v_range | FoldReset | Urgency-branch 5th-percentile Q EMA. Bootstrap: v_min. |
| [54] | `Q_P95_DIR_INDEX` | f32 | q_quantile_reduce GPU kernel (cold-path per-epoch) | update_eval_v_range | FoldReset | Direction-branch 95th-percentile Q EMA. Bootstrap: v_max. |
| [55] | `Q_P95_MAG_INDEX` | f32 | q_quantile_reduce | update_eval_v_range | FoldReset | Magnitude-branch 95th-percentile Q EMA. Bootstrap: v_max. |
| [56] | `Q_P95_ORD_INDEX` | f32 | q_quantile_reduce | update_eval_v_range | FoldReset | Order-branch 95th-percentile Q EMA. Bootstrap: v_max. |
| [57] | `Q_P95_URG_INDEX` | f32 | q_quantile_reduce | update_eval_v_range | FoldReset | Urgency-branch 95th-percentile Q EMA. Bootstrap: v_max. |
| [58..60) | (gap — fingerprint shifted to tail) | — | — | — | — | Previously [58..60); fingerprint promoted to [61..63) by Plan 2 Task 6C D.8 TLOB expansion. Slots unused; zero-filled. |
| [60] | `TLOB_REGIME_FOCUS_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | CPU training_loop (per-epoch) | ISV consumers (diagnostic) | FoldReset | Mean-max TLOB attention weight EMA (α=0.05); written at epoch boundary from `GpuTlob::mean_max_attention_weight`. Indicates OFI feature focus sharpness. |
| [61] | (gap — fingerprint shifted to tail) | — | — | — | — | Previously [61]; fingerprint promoted to [69..71) by Plan 3 Task 1 C.2 reward-EMA expansion. Slot unused; zero-filled. |
| [62] | (gap — fingerprint shifted to tail) | — | — | — | — | Previously [62]; see [61] note above. Slot unused; zero-filled. |
| [63] | `REWARD_POPART_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `reward_component_ema` kernel (Plan 3 C.2) | HEALTH_DIAG `reward_split`, `RewardComponentMonitor` | FoldReset | EMA of mean \|popart reward\| across batch (α=0.05). Final on-policy reward component. |
| [64] | `REWARD_CF_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `reward_component_ema` kernel (Plan 3 C.2) | HEALTH_DIAG `reward_split`, `RewardComponentMonitor` | FoldReset | EMA of mean \|counterfactual reward\| across batch (α=0.05). Zero until Plan 3 B.1. |
| [65] | `REWARD_TRAIL_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `reward_component_ema` kernel (Plan 3 C.2) | HEALTH_DIAG `reward_split`, `RewardComponentMonitor` | FoldReset | EMA of mean \|trail reward\| across batch (α=0.05). Structural placeholder; populated by Plan 3 B.2. |
| [66] | `REWARD_MICRO_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `reward_component_ema` kernel (Plan 3 C.2) | HEALTH_DIAG `reward_split`, `RewardComponentMonitor` | FoldReset | EMA of mean \|OFI micro-reward\| across batch (α=0.05). Populated via `rc[3]` in `experience_env_step`. |
| [67] | `REWARD_OPP_COST_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `reward_component_ema` kernel (Plan 3 C.2) | HEALTH_DIAG `reward_split`, `RewardComponentMonitor` | FoldReset | EMA of mean \|opportunity-cost reward\| across batch (α=0.05). Populated by Plan 3 B.1 at the Flat-branch opp-cost site. |
| [68] | `REWARD_BONUS_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `reward_component_ema` kernel (Plan 3 C.2) | HEALTH_DIAG `reward_split`, `RewardComponentMonitor` | FoldReset | EMA of mean \|bonus reward\| across batch (α=0.05). Populated by Plan 3 B.2 at the Flat→Positioned site (rc[5]). |
| [71] | `TRADE_ATTEMPT_RATE_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `trade_attempt_rate_ema_update` kernel (Plan 3 B.2) | `experience_env_step` Flat→Positioned bonus path | FoldReset | EMA of Flat→Positioned transition rate (0..1). Adaptive α = α_base × (1 + 0.5×\|clamp(sharpe, -2, 2)\|). α_base = 0.05. Zero at construction and fold boundary. |
| [72] | `TRADE_TARGET_RATE_INDEX` | f32 | CPU `training_loop` (epoch 5 freeze) | `experience_env_step` novelty computation | FoldReset | Reference rate for novelty = max(0, 1 - attempt/target). Frozen at epoch 5 from measured TRADE_ATTEMPT_RATE_EMA (min 0.001). Pre-freeze the slot is 0 and the bonus site gates on `target_raw > 1e-6f`, so the reward term is structurally inert until the freeze fires. |
| [73..76) | (gap — fingerprint shifted to tail) | — | — | — | — | Previously [73..75); fingerprint shifted by Plan 3 Task 4 B.4 to accommodate the new READINESS_EMA slot. Slots unused; zero-filled. |
| [75] | `READINESS_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `plan_threshold_update` kernel (Plan 3 B.4) | derived → ISV[PLAN_THRESHOLD_INDEX=49]; `PlanThresholdMonitor` | FoldReset | Per-batch mean readiness EMA (α=α_base × (1+0.5×\|clamp(sharpe,−2,2)\|), α_base=0.05). Cold-start 1.0 so derived threshold = 0.5 matches the previous static default. Drives slot 49 producer-only — consumers unchanged. |
| [78] | `STATE_KL_TRAIN_VAL_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `state_kl_moment_match` kernel (Plan 3 C.3) | `StateKLMonitor` (HEALTH_DIAG) | FoldReset | Per-validation-epoch moment-match KL EMA between train-state sample and val-state batch over the OFI block (32 dims). Adaptive α=α_base × (1+0.5×\|clamp(sharpe,−2,2)\|), α_base=0.05. Cold-start 0.0 — first kernel fire EMAs the actual measured KL toward this. |
| [79] | `STATE_KL_AMPLIFICATION_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `state_kl_moment_match` kernel (Plan 3 C.3) | `experience_kernels.cu` B.1 opp_cost + B.2 bonus consumers (via `ISV_STATE_KL_AMP_IDX` macro) | FoldReset | Bounded amplifier ∈ [1, 2] tracking trailing-EMA-of-self KL ratio: `1 + clamp(new_ema/prev_ema − 1, 0, 1)`. Cold-start 1.0 — neutral element behind consumers' `fmaxf(1.0, …)` guard. When train/val distributions diverge, both Flat opp-cost and trade-attempt bonus scale up together. Per `pearl_one_unbounded_signal_per_reward.md`: amp is bounded so it stacks safely with B.1's `q_abs_ref` unbounded multiplicand. |
| [48] | `CQL_ALPHA_INDEX` (post-Plan-3-T9 producer upgrade) | f32 | GPU `cql_alpha_seed_update` kernel (Plan 3 C.5) | `compute_cql_logit_gradients` (Rust ISV read) | FoldReset (was SchemaContract) | CQL pessimism base coefficient. Producer upgraded SchemaContract → FoldReset by Plan 3 Task 9 C.5: per-epoch GPU kernel EMAs slot 48 toward `config.cql_alpha × max(0, 1 - ISV[SEED_FRAC_EMA_INDEX=84])`. During seed phase (frac=1), target=0 → CQL α decays to 0 (no pessimism on exploration data); as frac → 0, α ramps to `config.cql_alpha` (full pessimism on network-driven trajectories). Constructor cold-starts to `config.cql_alpha`; fold-boundary reset re-applies. |
| [82] | `SEED_STEPS_TARGET_INDEX` | f32 | construct (CPU static, from `config.replay_seed_steps`) | `seed_step_counter_update` GPU kernel (Plan 3 B.3) | SchemaContract | Plan 3 Task 8 B.3 — target number of seed-phase experience-collection samples. Default 100_000; smoke configs may override to 10_000 so the seed→network transition is observable inside the smoke run. |
| [83] | `SEED_STEPS_DONE_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `seed_step_counter_update` kernel (Plan 3 B.3) | training_loop CPU dispatch decision (per-epoch read) + `seed_step_counter_update` self | FoldReset | Plan 3 Task 8 B.3 — cumulative seed-phase steps completed. GPU-incremented by `n_samples_this_step` per `collect_experiences_gpu` call, capped at TARGET. Cold-start 0; fold-boundary reset re-applies. CPU per-epoch read of (DONE, TARGET) decides whether next collect dispatches scripted-policy kernel (DONE < TARGET) or `experience_action_select`. |
| [84] | `SEED_FRAC_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `seed_step_counter_update` kernel (Plan 3 B.3) | GPU `cql_alpha_seed_update` kernel (Plan 3 C.5) + `SeedMonitor` | FoldReset | Plan 3 Task 8 B.3 — adaptive EMA of `max(0, 1 - DONE/TARGET) ∈ [0, 1]`. Cold-start 1.0 (fully in seed phase) so Task 9's CQL ramp sees `target = final × max(0, 1 - 1.0) = 0` until the seed phase actually decays. Adaptive α = α_base × (1 + 0.5 × \|clamp(sharpe, ±2)\|), α_base = 0.05. |
| [87] | `VSN_MAG_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `attention_focus_ema_update` kernel (Plan 4 E.5 Mode A; rewritten 2026-04-25 for GPU-only reduction) | `AttentionMonitor` (HEALTH_DIAG); HEALTH_DIAG `noisy [vsn_mag=…]` reads via `read_isv_signal_at` | FoldReset | Magnitude-branch VSN-weight magnitude EMA. **GPU-computed** by block 0 of `attention_focus_ema_update` (256-thread smem reduction over the params buffer slice corresponding to VSN mag tensors). Adaptive α = α_base × (1 + 0.5 × \|clamp(sharpe, ±2)\|), α_base = 0.05. Cold-start 0.0. Replaces the legacy CPU-DtoH `per_branch_vsn_mean()` that was deleted 2026-04-25 per `pearl_cold_path_no_exception_to_gpu_drives.md`. |
| [88] | `VSN_DIR_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `attention_focus_ema_update` kernel block 1 | same | FoldReset | Direction-branch equivalent of [87]. Same producer/contract. |
| [89] | `MAMBA2_RETENTION_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `attention_focus_ema_update` kernel block 2 | same | FoldReset | Mamba2 state-transition magnitude EMA (retention proxy). **GPU-computed** by block 2's smem reduction over the live `mamba2_h_enriched` device buffer (no DtoH). Same EMA convention as [87]. Diagnostic only. |
| [92] | `TARGET_DRIFT_MAG_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `target_drift_ema_update` kernel block 0 (Plan 4 follow-up, 2026-04-25) | HEALTH_DIAG `noisy [drift_mag=…]` via `read_isv_signal_at` | FoldReset | RMS(target − online) of magnitude-branch params (tensors 12..16), EMA-tracked. **GPU-computed** by block 0 of `target_drift_ema_update` (256-thread smem reduction of squared diffs, sqrt at thread 0). Adaptive α = α_base × (1 + 0.5 × \|clamp(sharpe, ±2)\|), α_base = 0.05. Cold-start 0.0. Replaces the legacy CPU-DtoH `per_branch_target_drift()` that was deleted 2026-04-25 per `pearl_cold_path_no_exception_to_gpu_drives.md`. |
| [93] | `TARGET_DRIFT_DIR_EMA_INDEX` | f32 | GPU `target_drift_ema_update` kernel block 1 | HEALTH_DIAG `noisy [drift_dir=…]` | FoldReset | Direction-branch equivalent of [92] (params tensors 8..12). |
| [115] | `ISV_LAYOUT_FINGERPRINT_LO_INDEX` | u32 bits (in f32) | construct | check_layout_fingerprint | SchemaContract | Low 32 bits of u64 FNV-1a structural hash. Fail-fast on mismatch — NOT a version number, no migration path. Shifted 69→73 by Plan 3 Task 3 B.2, 73→76 by Plan 3 Task 4 B.4, 76→80 by Plan 3 Task 7 C.3, 80→85 by Plan 3 Task 8 B.3, 85→90 by Plan 4 Task 5 Mode A, 90→94 by Plan 4 follow-up (target-drift EMA replacing legacy CPU-DtoH path), and 94→115 over the Plan 4 Task 6 / Plan 5 / MoE expansions that landed slots `[96..115)`. |
| [116] | `ISV_LAYOUT_FINGERPRINT_HI_INDEX` | u32 bits (in f32) | construct | check_layout_fingerprint | SchemaContract | High 32 bits of u64 FNV-1a structural hash. Tracks the same shift sequence as [115]. |
| [117..131) | (post-fingerprint slots filled by Plan 4 Task 6 / Plan 5 / MoE) | | | | | Includes `AUX_LABEL_SCALE_EMA_INDEX=117`, MoE expert-utilisation EMAs `[118..126)`, MoE `GATE_ENTROPY_EMA=126`, adaptive `MOE_LAMBDA_EFF=128`, `Q_DRIFT_RATE=129`, `FOLD_WARMUP_FACTOR=130`. Cross-reference the named constants in `gpu_dqn_trainer.rs`. |
| [131..171) | SP4 reservation (Layer A, no producers wired yet) | | | | | See "SP4: Signal-driven magnitude bounds" section below. |

## SP4: Signal-driven magnitude bounds (Layer A reservation)

SP4 Task A1 extends `ISV_TOTAL_DIM` from 131 → 171 by reserving 40 contiguous
slots at indices `[131..171)` for the signal-driven bounds that replace
hardcoded magnitude multipliers in SP3 mechanisms. Constants live in
`crates/ml/src/cuda_pipeline/sp4_isv_slots.rs` and are re-exported from
`cuda_pipeline::mod`. **Layer A is reservation-only — no producer kernels or
consumers are wired yet. All 40 slots remain zero-initialized at construction
and behave as no-ops until subsequent SP4 tasks land producers.**

| Index | Name constant | Family | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| [131] | `TARGET_Q_BOUND_INDEX` | scalar | p99(\|target_q\|) — Mech 1 clamp bound |
| [132..136) | `ATOM_POS_BOUND_BASE` + branch | per-branch | p99(\|atom_positions[branch]\|) — Mech 2 clamp |
| [136..144) | `WEIGHT_BOUND_BASE` + group | per-param-group | p99(\|params\|) — Mech 9 clamp |
| [144..152) | `ADAM_M_BOUND_BASE` + group | per-param-group | p99(\|adam_m\|) — Mech 5 diagnostic |
| [152..160) | `ADAM_V_BOUND_BASE` + group | per-param-group | p99(\|adam_v\|) — Mech 5 diagnostic |
| [160..168) | `WD_RATE_BASE` + group | per-param-group | EMA of \|w·g\|/\|\|w\|\|² — AdamW weight_decay arg |
| [168] | `GRAD_CLIP_BOUND_INDEX` | scalar | p99(grad_norm) — Mech 6 adaptive_clip upper bound |
| [169] | `H_S2_BOUND_INDEX` | scalar | p99(\|h_s2\|) — Mech 10 clamp bound |
| [170] | `L1_LAMBDA_TRUNK_INDEX` | scalar (group-0 only) | (mean\|g\|/mean\|w\|) × entropy_deficit — trunk L1 lambda |

Param-group ordering (`ParamGroup` enum, all 8 groups `[0..8)`):
DqnTrunk=0, DqnValue=1, DqnBranches=2, Iqn=3, IqlHigh=4, IqlLow=5, Attn=6,
Curiosity=7. Convenience `const fn` accessors `weight_bound(g)`,
`adam_m_bound(g)`, `adam_v_bound(g)`, `wd_rate(g)`, `atom_pos_bound(branch)`
return the absolute slot index for a given group/branch.

Producers and consumers will be wired in subsequent SP4 layer-B and layer-C
tasks; until then the 40 slots are zero-initialized and reserved.

## SP5: Per-branch + per-group adaptation layer (Task A0 reservation)

SP5 Task A0 extends `ISV_TOTAL_DIM` from 173 → 286 by reserving 110 slots at
`[174..278) ∪ [280..286)`. An intentional 2-slot carve-out gap at `[278..280)`
separates the per-fold block from the cross-fold-persistent Kelly block.
Constants live in `crates/ml/src/cuda_pipeline/sp5_isv_slots.rs`.

| Range | Base constant | Family | Pearl | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [174..178) | `ATOM_V_CENTER_BASE` | per-branch [4] | Pearl 1 | C51 atom distribution center |
| [178..182) | `ATOM_V_HALF_BASE` | per-branch [4] | Pearl 1 | C51 atom half-width |
| [182..186) | `ATOM_HEADROOM_BASE` | per-branch [4] | Pearl 1 | C51 atom headroom |
| [186..190) | `ATOM_CLIP_RATE_BASE` | per-branch [4] | Pearl 1 | C51 atom clip rate |
| [190..194) | `BUDGET_C51_BASE` | per-branch [4] | Pearl 2 | C51 loss budget weight. SP6 Pearl 2: `compute_adaptive_budgets()` reads individually, applies correction-factor sub-launches via `apply_c51_budget_scale_branch`. |
| [194..198) | `BUDGET_IQN_BASE` | per-branch [4] | Pearl 2 | IQN loss budget weight. SP6 Pearl 2: used as trunk-mean only (`iqn_trunk`) — IQN backward targets trunk params exclusively. |
| [198..202) | `BUDGET_CQL_BASE` | per-branch [4] | Pearl 2 | CQL loss budget weight. SP6 Pearl 2: `compute_adaptive_budgets()` reads individually, applies correction-factor sub-launches via `apply_cql_saxpy_branch`. |
| [202..206) | `BUDGET_ENS_BASE` | per-branch [4] | Pearl 2 | Ensemble loss budget weight. SP6 Pearl 2: used as trunk-mean only. |
| [206..210) | `FLATNESS_BASE` | per-branch [4] | Pearl 2 | Loss flatness diagnostic |
| [210..214) | `NOISY_SIGMA_BASE` | per-branch [4] | Pearl 3 | NoisyNet σ level — SP6 Pearl 3 consumer wired: `add_advantage_noise` kernel reads per-branch σ via mapped-pinned dev_ptr; `training_loop.rs` reads slots directly (no averaging) |
| [214..218) | `SIGMA_FRACTION_BASE` | per-branch [4] | Pearl 3 | NoisyNet σ fraction |
| [218..222) | `BRANCH_ENTROPY_BASE` | per-branch [4] | Pearl 3 | Branch action entropy |
| [222..226) | `Q_VAR_PER_BRANCH_BASE` | per-branch [4] | shared | Q-value variance |
| [226..234) | `ADAM_BETA1_BASE` | per-group [8] | Pearl 4 | Adam β1 per param group |
| [234..242) | `ADAM_BETA2_BASE` | per-group [8] | Pearl 4 | Adam β2 per param group |
| [242..250) | `ADAM_EPS_BASE` | per-group [8] | Pearl 4 | Adam ε per param group |
| [250..270) | `IQN_TAU_BASE` | per-branch×quantile [4×5] | Pearl 5 | IQN τ schedule |
| [270..274) | `TRAIL_DIST_PER_DIR_BASE` | per-direction [4] | Pearl 8 | Trail stop distance |
| [274..278) | `ATOM_NUM_ATOMS_BASE` | per-branch [4] | Pearl 1-ext | C51 atom count |
| [278..280) | — | gap | — | Intentional carve-out (not allocated) |
| [280] | `KELLY_F_SMOOTH_INDEX` | scalar | Pearl 6 | Kelly fraction EMA (cross-fold) |
| [281] | `CONVICTION_SMOOTH_INDEX` | scalar | Pearl 6 | Conviction EMA (cross-fold) |
| [282] | `TRADE_VAR_SMOOTH_INDEX` | scalar | Pearl 6 | Trade variance EMA (cross-fold) |
| [283] | `KELLY_SAMPLE_COUNT_INDEX` | scalar | Pearl 6 | Kelly sample count (cross-fold) |
| [284] | `WIN_RATE_SMOOTH_INDEX` | scalar | Pearl 6 | Win rate EMA (cross-fold) |
| [285] | `LOSS_RATE_SMOOTH_INDEX` | scalar | Pearl 6 | Loss rate EMA (cross-fold) |

Kelly slots `[280..286)` are NOT in the fold-reset registry. All other SP5 slots
are per-fold and reset at fold boundaries. Task A0 is reservation-only; producers
and consumers land in subsequent SP5 tasks.

## SP6 Pearl 5: IQN τ per-branch consumer wiring

SP6 Pearl 5 (commit in `sp6-pearl-5` worktree) upgrades the consumer side of
`ISV[250..270)` (`IQN_TAU_BASE`, 4 branches × 5 quantiles).

**Before SP6 (SP5 Layer B contract):** `fused_training.rs` read all 20 slots once
per epoch, averaged 4 branches per quantile to a single `[5]` tau array, and
uploaded it to the shared `online_taus/target_taus/cos_features` buffers.
One IQN forward pass per training step used the averaged schedule.

**After SP6 Pearl 5:** `GpuIqnHead` holds 12 additional `CudaSlice<f32>` buffers:
`online_taus_branch[4]`, `target_taus_branch[4]`, `cos_features_branch[4]`.
`refresh_taus_for_branch(b, tau5)` populates one branch slab per call — no
averaging. `activate_branch_taus(b)` / `deactivate_branch_taus(b)` swap the main
buffers for a per-branch pass via `mem::swap` (no allocation).

Training step: 4 sequential IQN forward passes, each with one branch's τ active.
Each pass calls `apply_iqn_trunk_gradient(iqn_budget / 4.0)` so total IQN
gradient contribution = `iqn_budget` (same as SP5 Layer B). The averaged
`refresh_taus_from_isv` is kept for CVaR and backward-compat consumers.

**Files changed:** `crates/ml/src/cuda_pipeline/gpu_iqn_head.rs`,
`crates/ml/src/trainers/dqn/fused_training.rs`.

## SP11: Reward as controlled subsystem (Tasks A0 + A1 + A2 + B0 + B1a + B1b)

SP11 Task A0 (Fix 39, 2026-05-04) extends `ISV_TOTAL_DIM` from 340 → 360 by
allocating 20 contiguous slots at `[340..360)` for the reward-subsystem
controller. Constants live in `crates/ml/src/cuda_pipeline/sp11_isv_slots.rs`
and are re-exported via `cuda_pipeline::sp5_isv_slots::*`.

**Task A1 (2026-05-04): three canary producer kernels added**, each
chained with `apply_pearls_ad_kernel` for Pearls A+D smoothing. Slots
[350..360) now have producers populating them every epoch (val_sharpe
emit cadence for the Δ canary; per-epoch metrics block for mag-ratio +
saboteur engagement).

**Task A2 (2026-05-04): controller producer + SimHash novelty buffer**.
The main `reward_subsystem_controller_kernel` reads all 5 canary slots
[350..360), runs the spec §3.4 control law (true Z-score → sigmoid blend
of winner/diversifier weights, post-floor renormalize Σ=1, permanent-
floor curiosity, post-clamp saboteur), and writes 10 outputs to scratch
which a chained `apply_pearls_ad_kernel` (n_slots=10) smooths into the
remaining slots [340..350). After A2 **all 20 SP11 slots populate every
step**.

A2 also lands the SimHash novelty infrastructure for B1's replay-time
curiosity bonus: `novelty_simhash_proj_init_kernel` (one-shot Philox-
driven init at trainer construct, populates a 42×16 ±1 projection
matrix on-device per `feedback_no_cpu_forwards.md`),
`novelty_simhash_kernel` (lookup + update, race-tolerated update per
`feedback_no_atomicadd.md` — under-counts bias novelty UPWARD, the safe
direction). The 1M-slot hash table at `GpuDqnTrainer.novelty_hash_buf`
gets a fold-reset registry entry (`sp11_novelty_hash`) that closes the
A0 deferral; the projection matrix is frozen for the run lifetime and
intentionally has NO registry entry.

**Layer A was additive (A0/A1/A2). Layer B atomic consumer migration:**

- **B0 (commit `302992f63`):** controller renormalisation flipped from
  `Σ=1` to `mean=1` (Σ=N=6) per spec §3.4.3 amendment so per-bar
  `w_active × r_active` ≈ pre-SP11 absolute scale on average. Per-
  component cap MAX_WEIGHT=3.0 (Invariant-1, prevents winner-take-all).
- **B1a (commit `d5e1214f2`):** saboteur GPU multiplication via
  `SABOTEUR_INTENSITY_MULT_INDEX` and SimHash novelty-buffer
  `state_stride` correctness for B1c curiosity wiring.
- **B1b (this commit):** structural reward decomposition in
  `experience_env_step` — 8+ inline accumulation sites replaced with
  explicit per-component locals (`r_popart`, `r_cf`, `r_trail`,
  `r_micro`, `r_opp_cost`, `r_bonus`) composed as `Σ w_i × r_i` with
  controller weights from ISV[340..346). Universal post-composition
  modifiers (drawdown / capital-floor / inventory / churn /
  conviction-scale / cf-flip) apply unweighted per spec §3.4.4. Trail
  P&L extraction (§3.5.4) — forced-exit P&L now flows through
  `r_trail` (rc[2]); voluntary-exit through `r_popart`. cf-tuple
  reward at `out_rewards[cf_off]` is now `w_cf × r_cf` (the
  `cf_weight=0.3f` constants in `mse_loss_kernel.cu:318` /
  `c51_loss_kernel.cu:789` are STRUCTURAL Q-blend weights, NOT reward
  weights — left UNTOUCHED per §3.5 amendment). Sentinel-defense:
  `fmaxf(w_raw, 0.01)` covers the cold-start ordering gap (the
  controller runs at end-of-epoch, so step 0 of fold 0 reads sentinel
  0; defense pins minimum scale at the Invariant-1 hard floor).
- **B1c (pending):** replay-time curiosity bonus per §3.5.5 (Layer C
  audit gate — `rewards_buf` single-read-site verification).

A1 producers:
- `val_sharpe_delta_compute_kernel.cu` — two-pass: raw Δ + squared
  deviation against prior `VAL_SHARPE_DELTA_EMA_INDEX`. Reads
  mapped-pinned 2-element val_sharpe_history; chain → ISV[350, 351].
- `saboteur_engagement_compute_kernel.cu` — block tree-reduce over
  per-bar `|Δreward|` populated by `experience_env_step` at the
  saboteur perturbation site (proxy: `traded × |reward| ×
  max(|eff_spread − 1|, |eff_slip − 1|)`); threshold = 0.01 ×
  ISV[PNL_REWARD_MAGNITUDE_EMA_INDEX]. Chain → ISV[358].
- `reward_component_mag_ratio_compute_kernel.cu` — reads 6 EMAs at
  ISV[REWARD_POPART_EMA_INDEX..+6), normalises to ratios, mirrors
  popart magnitude into scratch[6] as a side-output. Chain (n_slots=6)
  → ISV[352..358); chain (n_slots=1) → ISV[359].

6 GPU oracle tests in `crates/ml/tests/sp11_producer_unit_tests.rs`
cover (A1) first-observation behaviour, threshold classification, and
normalisation invariants on the canary kernels; plus (A2) the
controller midpoint-at-z=0 invariant, weight-renormalization-after-floor
invariant, and saboteur-post-clamp-at-extreme-regression invariant.
All MappedF32Buffer fixtures (zero
htod_copy/dtoh_sync_copy/alloc_zeros per
`feedback_no_htod_htoh_only_mapped_pinned`).

| Range | Name constant | Family | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| [340] | `REWARD_POPART_WEIGHT_INDEX` | scalar | Component weight: PopArt reward |
| [341] | `REWARD_CF_WEIGHT_INDEX` | scalar | Component weight: counterfactual (replaces hardcoded `cf_weight=0.3f`) |
| [342] | `REWARD_TRAIL_WEIGHT_INDEX` | scalar | Component weight: trail-stop |
| [343] | `REWARD_MICRO_WEIGHT_INDEX` | scalar | Component weight: microstructure |
| [344] | `REWARD_OPP_COST_WEIGHT_INDEX` | scalar | Component weight: opportunity cost |
| [345] | `REWARD_BONUS_WEIGHT_INDEX` | scalar | Component weight: exploration bonus |
| [346] | `CURIOSITY_PRESSURE_INDEX` | scalar | Controller output: curiosity scale (replay-time bonus) |
| [347] | `SABOTEUR_INTENSITY_MULT_INDEX` | scalar | Controller output: saboteur intensity multiplier ∈ [0.5, 2.0] |
| [348] | `REWARD_WEIGHT_FLOOR_INDEX` | scalar | Controller output: minimum-weight floor |
| [349] | `CURIOSITY_BOUND_INDEX` | scalar | Controller output: curiosity hard cap (= 0.3 × pnl_magnitude_ema) |
| [350] | `VAL_SHARPE_DELTA_EMA_INDEX` | scalar canary | val-sharpe trend EMA (improvement_z numerator) |
| [351] | `VAL_SHARPE_VAR_EMA_INDEX` | scalar canary | val-sharpe variance EMA (improvement_z denominator) |
| [352..358) | `REWARD_COMPONENT_MAG_RATIO_BASE` (+6) | per-component canary | Per-component reward-magnitude ratio (winner/diversifier blend input) |
| [358] | `SABOTEUR_ENGAGEMENT_RATE_INDEX` | scalar canary | Per-bar saboteur engagement rate EMA |
| [359] | `PNL_REWARD_MAGNITUDE_EMA_INDEX` | scalar canary | `|reward_total|` EMA (curiosity-bound scale factor) |
| [360] | `POPART_COMPONENT_MAG_EMA_INDEX` | scalar canary | popart-component-specific magnitude EMA (B1b fix-up; mag-ratio canary popart axis input) |
| [361..367) | `REWARD_COMPONENT_VAR_EMA_BASE` (+6) | per-component canary | Per-reward-component variance EMA (B1b smoke-recovery z-score normalisation; popart var at 361, then cf/trail/micro/opp_cost/bonus at 362..367) |

Invariant-1 fraction constants (rate-limiter anchors per spec §3.4.2):
`SP11_EPS_DIV=1e-6`, `SP11_WEIGHT_HARD_FLOOR=0.01`,
`SP11_SABOTEUR_MIN=0.5`, `SP11_SABOTEUR_MAX=2.0`,
`SP11_CURIOSITY_PERMANENT_FRACTION=0.2`, `SP11_CURIOSITY_BOUND_FRACTION=0.3`,
`SP11_WEIGHT_FLOOR_FRACTION=0.5`, `SP11_ENGAGEMENT_FLOOR=0.1`. Plus
`SP11_PROJ_SEED_SALT=0x_5511_0001` for the A2 novelty-SimHash projection-init
launcher's seed derivation.

**B1b fix-up (2026-05-04, spec §4 amendment):** ISV[360] = `POPART_COMPONENT_MAG_EMA_INDEX`
added to resolve the slot-63 PopArt-input vs popart-component-magnitude
overload that B1b smoke surfaced. Pre-fix-up the SP11 mag-ratio canary
read 6 contiguous slots starting at slot 63 — but slot 63 was overloaded
(PopArt's normalisation input AND popart-component magnitude collapsed to
the same value because reward composition was inline accumulation). B1b's
structural decomposition surfaced the contamination — controller
redistributed weight toward popart (w_pop ≈ 2.0) based on contaminated
ratio → 10× sharpe drop. Post-fix-up the mag-ratio kernel takes two slot
indices: `popart_specific_slot=360` for the popart axis,
`cf_others_base_slot=64` for cf/trail/micro/opp_cost/bonus. Slot 63 is
unchanged (PopArt's input = total reward magnitude, pre-SP11 invariant
preserved); slot 360 is the new dedicated popart-component magnitude
produced by `popart_component_ema_kernel`. ISV total: 360 → 361.

**B1b smoke-recovery (2026-05-04, spec §4 amendment "Why z-score" lines
564-619):** ISV[361..367) = `REWARD_COMPONENT_VAR_EMA_BASE..+6` added
to drive z-score normalisation in `reward_component_mag_ratio_compute_kernel`.
Pre-z-score the linear `winner_weight = mag_ratio` formula amplified
popart's intrinsic O(100) magnitude over the other 5 components'
O(0.1-2). Result: w_pop saturated toward MAX_WEIGHT, curiosity_b
exploded, sharpe collapsed in B1b smoke `smoke-test-6wd2c` on commit
`61b2fa962`. Z-score makes ratios scale-invariant —
z[c] = mag[c] / max(sqrt(var[c]), EPS_DIV); ratio[c] = z[c] / Σz.
Variance EMAs are produced via Welford's online algorithm in the
extended `popart_component_ema_kernel` (slot 361) and
`reward_component_ema_kernel` (slots 362..367); the canary now takes
4 slot indices (popart mag/var split + cf-others mag/var bases). The
mirror at scratch[6] still emits popart RAW magnitude (slot 359 input
for curiosity bound + saboteur engagement which need physical scale).
ISV total: 361 → 367.

All 21 slots are FoldReset (sentinel 0; Pearl A bootstraps from first
producer launch on each fold per `pearl_first_observation_bootstrap.md`).
After A2 all 20 slots have producers; B1b wires the on-policy reward
composition consumer for [340..346) (the 6 component weights).
B1c will wire the curiosity consumer for [346] + [349] (replay-time).
[347] saboteur multiplier already consumed in B1a's
gpu_experience_collector site. [348] `REWARD_WEIGHT_FLOOR_INDEX` is
self-consumed by the controller on the next step. [350..360) canaries
are read by the controller (intra-cycle).

The novelty-hash device buffer (`GpuDqnTrainer.novelty_hash_buf`,
1M slots × f32 mapped-pinned) lands in A2 alongside its registry entry
(`sp11_novelty_hash`) and dispatch arm. The 42×16 SimHash projection
matrix (`GpuDqnTrainer.novelty_simhash_proj`) is populated on-device by
`launch_novelty_simhash_proj_init` at trainer construct time (Philox-
driven from `SP11_PROJ_SEED_SALT`); it is **frozen for the run
lifetime** and intentionally has NO registry entry — it is the hash
function, not state.

**Spec:** `docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-04-sp11-reward-as-controlled-subsystem.md`
**Plan:** `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-05-04-sp11-reward-as-controlled-subsystem.md`

---

## SP14 — Aux→Q Wire + Earned Gradient Flow [383..396)

**13 slots** allocated in `sp14_isv_slots.rs` (B.1, 2026-05-05).
Slots [381..383) were already claimed by SP13 closeout
(`HOLD_RATE_TARGET_INDEX=381`, `HOLD_RATE_OBSERVED_EMA_INDEX=382`), so
SP14 starts at 383 (shifted +2 from the original plan which documented
[381..394)).

| Slot | Constant | Reset | Notes |
|------|----------|-------|-------|
| 383 | `Q_DISAGREEMENT_SHORT_EMA_INDEX` | FoldReset (0.5) | K=4↔K=2 argmax mismatch fast EMA |
| 384 | `Q_DISAGREEMENT_LONG_EMA_INDEX` | FoldReset (0.5) | K=4↔K=2 argmax mismatch slow EMA |
| 385 | `K_AUX_ADAPTIVE_INDEX` | FoldReset (0.0→K_BASE_AUX) | Sigmoid steepness for Gate 1 (aux competence) |
| 386 | `K_Q_ADAPTIVE_INDEX` | FoldReset (0.0→K_BASE_Q) | Sigmoid steepness for Gate 2 (Q-head disagreement) |
| 387 | `BETA_RATE_LIMITER_ADAPTIVE_INDEX` | FoldReset (0.0→BETA_BASE) | Rate-limiter β (variance-driven) |
| 388 | `AUX_DIR_ACC_VARIANCE_EMA_INDEX` | FoldReset (0.0) | Welford variance for k_aux adaptation |
| 389 | `Q_DISAGREEMENT_VARIANCE_EMA_INDEX` | FoldReset (0.0) | Welford variance for k_q adaptation |
| 390 | `ALPHA_GRAD_RAW_VARIANCE_EMA_INDEX` | FoldReset (0.0) | Welford variance for β adaptation |
| 391 | `GATE1_OPEN_STATE_INDEX` | FoldReset (0.0) | Schmitt-trigger state (0=closed, 1=open) |
| 392 | `ALPHA_GRAD_RAW_INDEX` | NOT reset (recomputed every step) | Raw gate output (HEALTH_DIAG visibility) |
| 393 | `ALPHA_GRAD_SMOOTHED_INDEX` | FoldReset (0.0) | Rate-limited gate consumed by backward path |
| 394 | `AUX_DIR_ACC_POST_OPEN_MIN_INDEX` | FoldReset (1.0) | Post-open aux_dir_acc minimum (circuit breaker) |
| 395 | `GRADIENT_HACK_LOCKOUT_REMAINING_INDEX` | NOT reset (epoch-boundary decay) | Lockout epochs remaining (anti-gradient-hacking) |

Slots 396-398 are conceptual buffer; no constants allocated.

11 of the 13 slots are FoldReset per `pearl_first_observation_bootstrap.md`.
Slots 392 (ALPHA_GRAD_RAW) and 395 (GRADIENT_HACK_LOCKOUT_REMAINING) are
intentionally excluded from fold-reset: raw is recomputed every step from
the three Welford variance EMAs; lockout decays at epoch boundary and must
not be force-reset mid-fold.

Producer + consumer wiring lands in B.3-B.12; B.1 is additive
infrastructure (slot constants), B.2 wires the 11 fold-reset registry
entries + dispatch arms — both are additive only (no behavior change).

B.12 (2026-05-05) adds the per-epoch `HEALTH_DIAG[{epoch}]: pearl_egf_diag`
emit in `training_loop.rs` reading all 13 slots. gate1/gate2 sigmoid output
values are omitted from the emit (recomputing host-side would violate
`feedback_no_cpu_compute_strict`); the inputs are sufficient for inference.

**Spec:** `docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-05-sp14-aux-q-wire-earned-gradient-flow.md`
**Plan:** `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-05-05-sp14-aux-q-wire-earned-gradient-flow.md`

## SP14 L1+L2 root-cause fix — ISV_TOTAL_DIM bump (2026-05-05)

**Smoke A2-B exposed:** SP14 slots at 383-395 were OOB of the ISV bus (sized for `ISV_TOTAL_DIM=383`, top of SP13). All SP14 reads/writes touched memory past the end of the bus → gate1 stuck at 0 (OOB zero-init), post_open_min accumulated garbage (9.5 → 28 → 46), α_smoothed values were undefined behavior.

**Fix:**
- `ISV_TOTAL_DIM: 383 → 396` in `gpu_dqn_trainer.rs:1088`
- Extended `layout_fingerprint_seed()` with all 13 SP14 slot name=index entries + new `ISV_TOTAL_DIM=396` marker → forces fingerprint hash bump per Invariant 8 (old checkpoints invalidated correctly)
- 2 new regression tests in `sp14_isv_slots.rs`:
  - `all_sp14_slots_fit_within_isv_total_dim`: catches the exact bug Smoke A2-B exposed
  - `sp14_slot_layout_locked`: locks slot layout against silent renumbering (mirrors SP5 pattern)

**Why this slipped through:** SP4/SP5 had analogous regression tests (`all_sp4_slots_fit_within_isv_total_dim`); SP14's was missing. The bug was silent because OOB GPU reads return zeros (or adjacent-allocation contents) instead of crashing — sentinel values that look almost-plausible.

**Open follow-up (separate from L1/L2):** `warmup_gate` uses hardcoded `WARMUP_STEPS_FALLBACK=1000` constant. Per `feedback_isv_for_adaptive_bounds`, this should be ISV-signal-driven (variance-driven) OR removed entirely since k_aux/k_q already provide variance-driven warmup behavior. Redesign post-re-smoke once bus-size fix is verified.

## SP14 L1+L2 follow-up — warmup_gate deletion (2026-05-05, atomic with bus-fix)

**Resolution of the open follow-up above:** Removed `warmup_gate` entirely instead of redesigning ISV-driven. The variance-driven k_aux/k_q already provide warmup behavior — when var_aux/var_q are high (cold-start), `k = K_BASE / (1 + var/VARIANCE_REF)` collapses toward `K_MIN`, which makes the sigmoid flat → gate ≈ 0.5 regardless of input. Once EMAs settle, k → K_BASE → sharp sigmoid → gates respond correctly. The separate hardcoded WARMUP_STEPS_FALLBACK ramp was double-counting and tuning-driven.

**Removed:**
- `WARMUP_STEPS_FALLBACK` constant in `sp14_isv_slots.rs`
- `warmup_gate: f32` parameter in `alpha_grad_compute_kernel.cu`
- `gate1 * gate2 * warmup_gate` → `gate1 * gate2` in kernel
- `warmup_gate` argument from `launch_sp14_alpha_grad_compute` launcher
- `fold_step_counter: usize` field on the trainer struct (was the ramp driver)
- `fold_step_counter = 0` reset in `reset_for_fold`
- `fold_step_counter` init in trainer constructor
- `let warmup_gate: f32 = 1.0;` and `.arg(&warmup_gate)` from B.4 oracle tests

**Net result:** EGF gate's warmup behavior now lives entirely in the variance-driven k_aux/k_q sigmoid steepness controller. ISV-signal-driven via slots 388 (var_aux) and 389 (var_q). No hardcoded step counter. Honors `feedback_isv_for_adaptive_bounds`.

## SP15 — Trader Discipline Recovery (Pre-Phase P.2 reservation, 2026-05-06)

SP15 Pre-Phase Task P.2 extends `ISV_TOTAL_DIM` from 396 → 443 by reserving 46
contiguous slots at `[397..443)`. SP15 Phase 1.3.b-followup (2026-05-07)
appends one more slot at `[443..444)` (DD_PERSISTENCE_MAX_INDEX) for the
per-env DD redesign, bringing `ISV_TOTAL_DIM` to 444 and `SP15_SLOT_END` to 444
(47 SP15 slots total). The allocation pre-claims disjoint ranges across 3
sub-worktrees (Approach B parallel-dispatch) so Phase 0/1/2A can land
producers and consumers independently without index collisions.

**Allocation map (per spec §4.3 + Phase 1.3.b-followup audit doc entry):**

| Range | Phase | Purpose |
|-------|-------|---------|
| `[397..401)` | Phase 0.B | EGF retune anchors (SCHMITT_HI/LO + VAR_AUX/Q_REF) |
| `[401..407)` | Phase 1.3 + 1.3.b-followup | Drawdown reporting (current/max/recovery_bars/persistence/calmar/dd_pct). Phase 1.3.b-followup (2026-05-07): now mean-aggregated across envs by `dd_state_reduce_kernel` from the per-env tile `sp15_dd_state_per_env[alloc_episodes * 6]`; the per-(env, slot) DD context is read directly by `compute_sp15_final_reward_kernel` from the tile |
| `[407..409)` | Phase 1.2 | Cost kernel (OFI_IMPACT_LAMBDA + COST_PER_BAR_AVG) |
| `[409..417)` | Phase 1.4 | 8 counterfactual baselines (buyhold/hold-only/random-dir-kelly/naive-momentum/aux-only/mag-quarter-fixed/trail-only/naive-reversion sharpe) |
| `[417..420)` | Phase 3.1 | r_quality + r_discipline split (ALPHA_SPLIT + grad-norm quality/discipline) |
| `[420..423)` | Phase 3.3 | Quadratic DD penalty (LAMBDA_DD + DD_THRESHOLD + DD_PENALTY_GRAD_NORM) |
| `[423..426)` | Phase 3.4 | Regret signal (REGRET_EMA + LAMBDA_REGRET + REGRET_GRAD_NORM) |
| `[426..430)` | Phase 3.5 | Confidence-aware Hold floor (HOLD_FLOOR_ALPHA/K/EPS0 + ENTROPY_DIST_REF) |
| `[430..433)` | Phase 3.5.2 | DD asymmetric reward (DD_ASYMMETRY_LAMBDA + R_GAIN_DD_BOOST + DD_DIST_VAR) |
| `[433..436)` | Phase 3.5.3 | Cooldown gate (K_THRESHOLD + M_BARS + BARS_REMAINING) |
| `[436..439)` | Phase 3.5.4 | Plasticity injection (FIRED_THIS_FOLD + PERSISTENCE_THRESHOLD + WARM_BARS_REMAINING) |
| `[439..441)` | Phase 3.5.5 | Recovery curriculum in PER (DD_TRAJECTORY_DECREASING + RECOVERY_OVERSAMPLE_WEIGHT) |
| `[441..443)` | Phase 3.5 deferred | DD_TRAJECTORY_FLOOR + MEDIAN_STREAK_LENGTH ISV anchors |
| `[443..444)` | Phase 1.3.b-followup | DD_PERSISTENCE_MAX (max-aggregate of per-env DD_PERSISTENCE; consumed by `plasticity_injection_kernel` so the global advantage-head reset fires when ANY env exceeds the threshold — one set of advantage weights → global firing semantics → max-aggregate is the only correct rule) |

**Files touched (P.2 atomic):**
- `crates/ml/src/cuda_pipeline/sp15_isv_slots.rs` (new) — 46 `pub const *_INDEX` constants + SP15_SLOT_BASE/END/COUNT + 2 regression tests (`all_sp15_slots_fit_within_isv_total_dim`, `sp15_slot_layout_locked`)
- `crates/ml/src/cuda_pipeline/mod.rs` — `pub mod sp15_isv_slots;` declaration
- `crates/ml/src/cuda_pipeline/gpu_dqn_trainer.rs` — `ISV_TOTAL_DIM: 396 → 443`, `layout_fingerprint_seed()` extended with all 46 slot `name=index` entries before the `ISV_TOTAL_DIM=443` marker (forces fingerprint hash bump → pre-SP15 checkpoints invalidated, greenfield OK per spec Q1)

**Greenfield sub-worktrees:** `.worktrees/sp15-phase0-egf-retune`, `.worktrees/sp15-phase1-honest-numbers`, `.worktrees/sp15-phase2a-test-scaffold` rebase onto this commit so each phase's producers/consumers see the slot map.

**Producers/consumers status:** P.2 lands the slot reservation only; all 46 slots are zero-initialized until per-phase tasks land producers (Phase 0/1/3) and atomic consumer migration (Phase 3.X). Mirrors the SP4/SP5/SP11 pre-allocation pattern.

## Class A audit-fix Batch 4-A — adaptive DD saturation floor (2026-05-08)

| Range | Phase | Purpose |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `[458..459)` | Batch 4-A | DD_SATURATION_FLOOR_ADAPTIVE — replaces hardcoded `0.25f` in `trade_physics.cuh::apply_margin_cap` (the upper end of the linear position-size scaling ramp `dd_scale = max(0.05, 1.0 − dd_frac/saturation_floor)`). Producer `dd_saturation_floor_update_kernel.cu` aggregates per-env DD_MAX from `sp15_dd_state_per_env[n_envs * 6]` (offset 1) via Welford `mean + Z_75 × sigma` p75 estimator × 1.5 safety factor. Pearl-A bootstrap (sentinel 0.25 = pre-fix value) + α=0.01 slow EMA (per-epoch boundary). Bounds [0.10, 0.50] = Category-1 dimensional safety. Distinct from `SP15_DD_THRESHOLD_INDEX=421` (the SP15 quadratic DD-penalty *trigger* threshold, a *lower* bound). |

**Atomic deletion alongside this addition:** legacy `compute_drawdown_penalty` device function in trade_physics.cuh + its single caller at experience_kernels.cu:3822 + the `w_dd` Rust config field + the `dd_threshold` and `w_dd` kernel args + all `w_dd` profile/TOML references. Per `feedback_no_legacy_aliases` + `feedback_no_partial_refactor` — SP15's quadratic asymmetric DD penalty in `compute_sp15_final_reward_kernel.cu:154` is the production-grade replacement; layering both creates double-counting.

**ISV_TOTAL_DIM:** 458 → 459 (Item 1 adds 1 slot; Item 2 is pure deletion).

## SP20 — WR-first Reward Optimization (Pre-Phase reservation, 2026-05-09)

SP20 Pre-Phase Task Pre.2 reserves 10 contiguous slots at `[510..520)` for the
WR-first reward design. This reservation occurs at the start of the SP20
work stream and establishes the slot base for upcoming components:

| Index | Name constant | Purpose | Producer | Notes |
|-------|---|---|---|---|
| [510] | `LOSS_CAP_INDEX` | Target loss ceiling per transaction (tuning anchor for asymmetric cap) | Per-epoch ISV seed | Bounds the reward penalty for loss scenarios; component 1a |
| [511] | `ALPHA_EMA_INDEX` | Adaptive alpha for transaction-cost EMA decay | GPU kernel (planned) | Tunes the responsiveness of trading cost adjustments; component 1b |
| [512] | `WR_EMA_INDEX` | Win rate EMA for per-bar reward shaping | GPU kernel (planned) | Tracks historical WR; component 2 input signal |
| [513] | `HOLD_COST_SCALE_INDEX` | Per-bar Hold-state carrying cost scaling | Per-epoch ISV seed | Modulates the cost of staying in a position; component 3a |
| [514] | `TARGET_HOLD_PCT_INDEX` | Target percentage of bars spent in Hold state | Per-epoch ISV seed | Reference for adaptive controller; component 3b |
| [515] | `HOLD_PCT_EMA_INDEX` | EMA of actual Hold percentage across bars | GPU kernel (planned) | Driven by adaptive controller; component 3c |
| [516] | `HOLD_REWARD_EMA_INDEX` | EMA of per-bar Hold reward component | GPU kernel (planned) | Tracks reward contribution from Hold state; component 3d |
| [517] | `N_STEP_INDEX` | N-step lookahead window for reward shaping | Per-epoch ISV seed | Controls temporal credit assignment; component 4 |
| [518] | `AUX_CONF_THRESHOLD_INDEX` | Aux confidence threshold for gating auxiliary supervision | Per-epoch ISV seed | Prevents aux contamination; component 5a |
| [519] | `AUX_GATE_TEMP_INDEX` | Temperature parameter for aux gating sigmoid | Per-epoch ISV seed | Controls steepness of confidence-gating function; component 5b |

**Files touched (Pre.2 atomic):**
- `crates/ml/src/cuda_pipeline/sp14_isv_slots.rs` — 10 `pub const *_INDEX` constants (at the top level, before the test module) + SP20_SLOT_BASE (510) + SP20_SLOT_END (520) constants + 1 regression test (`sp20_isv_slots_reserved_510_to_520`) verifying all 10 slot indices and ISV_TOTAL_DIM=520
- `crates/ml/src/cuda_pipeline/gpu_dqn_trainer.rs` — `ISV_TOTAL_DIM: 510 → 520`, `layout_fingerprint_seed()` extended with all 10 slot `name=index` entries + `ISV_TOTAL_DIM=520` marker (forces fingerprint hash bump → pre-SP20 checkpoints invalidated, greenfield OK)
- `crates/ml/src/trainers/dqn/state_reset_registry.rs` — Task Pre.3 registers all 10 SP20 slots with `FoldReset` category and sentinel=0.0 per `pearl_first_observation_bootstrap`; includes unit test `sp20_isv_slots_registered_with_sentinel_zero`

**Producers/consumers status:** Pre.2 lands the slot reservation only; Pre.3 registers in state reset machinery; all 10 slots are zero-initialized until subsequent SP20 phases land producers (per-epoch ISV seeds + GPU kernels) and consumer migration. Mirrors the SP4/SP5/SP11/SP15 pre-allocation pattern.

**ISV_TOTAL_DIM:** 510 → 520 (Pre.2 adds 10 slots).

## Alpha trading system — durable infrastructure block (2026-05-15)

Phase E intro commit reserves 12 contiguous slots at `[539..551)` for **system-scoped** infrastructure of the alpha trading stack (stacker / execution-policy diagnostics, controller anchors, population baselines). Unlike the per-iteration SP4..SP22 reservations, this block is named for the *system* — slots are intended to outlive any individual Phase E/F/G milestone. New slots in this range should be added in `alpha_isv_slots.rs` first; spares at 549..550 absorb growth without bumping `ISV_TOTAL_DIM`.

| Index | Name constant                       | Role         | Producer (initial commit)              | Update cadence       | Notes |
|-------|-------------------------------------|--------------|----------------------------------------|----------------------|-------|
| 539   | `Q_SPREAD_EMA_INDEX`                | Diagnostic   | (none; Phase E.1 kill-criteria kernel) | per-rollout-step     | `std(Q, axis=action) / |mean(Q)|`; kill-criterion #1 |
| 540   | `ACTION_ENTROPY_EMA_INDEX`          | Diagnostic   | (none; Phase E.1 kill-criteria kernel) | per-rollout-step     | `H(action_dist)` over recent rollouts; kill-criterion #2 |
| 541   | `RETURN_VS_RANDOM_EMA_INDEX`        | Diagnostic   | (none; Phase E.1 kill-criteria kernel) | per-trade-close      | `(rollout_R − random_R) / σ_random`; kill-criterion #3 |
| 542   | `EARLY_Q_MOVEMENT_EMA_INDEX`        | Diagnostic   | (none; Phase E.1 kill-criteria kernel) | per-epoch            | `|Q(s_early) − Q_init|/|Q_init|`; kill-criterion #4 |
| 543   | `STACKER_THRESHOLD_INDEX`           | Controller   | (none; Phase E.2 stacker controller)   | per-rollout-step     | Confidence threshold for trade eligibility; engagement-rate self-correction |
| 544   | `TRADE_RATE_TARGET_INDEX`           | Anchor       | host init at training start            | static               | Target trade-rate fraction (e.g. 0.08) |
| 545   | `TRADE_RATE_OBSERVED_EMA_INDEX`     | Diagnostic   | (none; Phase E.2 stacker controller)   | per-rollout-step     | Observed trade-rate EMA |
| 546   | `STACKER_KELLY_ATTENUATION_INDEX`   | Controller   | (none; Phase E.2 stacker controller)   | per-trade-close      | Multiplied with `KELLY_F_SMOOTH_INDEX=280` before contract-cap; bounded [0.1, 1.0] per `pearl_blend_formulas_must_have_permanent_floor` |
| 547   | `RANDOM_BASELINE_MEAN_INDEX`        | Anchor       | host computes once per fold            | per-fold             | Mean reward of uniform-random execution policy at the given horizon |
| 548   | `RANDOM_BASELINE_STD_INDEX`         | Anchor       | host computes once per fold            | per-fold             | Std of same — used to compute `RETURN_VS_RANDOM_EMA` σ-distance |
| 549   | (reserved spare)                    | —            | —                                      | —                    | Absorb growth; do not use ad-hoc |
| 550   | (reserved spare)                    | —            | —                                      | —                    | Absorb growth; do not use ad-hoc |

**Files touched (intro commit, slot reservation only):**
- `crates/ml/src/cuda_pipeline/alpha_isv_slots.rs` (new) — 10 `pub const *_INDEX` constants + `ALPHA_ISV_BLOCK_LO=539`/`ALPHA_ISV_BLOCK_HI=550` bookends + 4 unit tests (bounds, membership, uniqueness, total-dim coverage)
- `crates/ml/src/cuda_pipeline/mod.rs` — adds `pub mod alpha_isv_slots;`
- `crates/ml/src/cuda_pipeline/gpu_dqn_trainer.rs` — `ISV_TOTAL_DIM: 539 → 551`; comment updated to reference `alpha_isv_slots.rs`

**Producers/consumers status:** intro commit is reservation-only. Producers land later in Phase E:
- Phase E.1: `phase_e_kill_criteria.cu` writes slots 539-542
- Phase E.2: `stacker_threshold_controller.cu` writes slots 543, 545, 546 (reads 544 as anchor)
- Phase E.0: host writes 544 (trade-rate target) at training start and 547, 548 (baselines) per fold

State-reset-registry dispatch arms for all 10 active slots land in the immediately-following commit (Phase E Task 2), per `feedback_registry_entries_need_dispatch_arms`.

**Naming rationale:** SP4..SP22 reservations are *milestone-scoped* (a specific SP iteration); this block is *system-scoped* (alpha trading system across Phase E/F/G/...). The naming difference is intentional — future alpha-system additions go in `alpha_isv_slots.rs`, not in a per-phase file.

**ISV_TOTAL_DIM:** 539 → 551 (12 slots reserved, 10 active, 2 spare).

## Alpha trading system block — registry + dispatch wiring (2026-05-15, follow-up)

Phase E Task 2 lands the registry entries + 7 dispatch arms (4 SoftReset diagnostics + 3 FoldReset controllers) for the alpha-system slots reserved in Task 1. Per `feedback_registry_entries_need_dispatch_arms`, both must land in the same commit; the test `every_fold_and_soft_reset_entry_has_dispatch_arm` walks the source of `reset_named_state` and verifies every FoldReset/SoftReset entry has a matching match arm. 3 TrainingPersist anchors (544, 547, 548) intentionally do NOT have dispatch arms — the registry test filters them out per the convention at `state_reset_registry.rs:2325`.

**Files touched (atomic with Task 1 if you want to squash; otherwise standalone):**
- `crates/ml/src/trainers/dqn/state_reset_registry.rs` — 10 RegistryEntry rows appended after the SP22 block, each with full producer/consumer rationale (Pearl A bootstrap, α-update mechanism, reset semantics)
- `crates/ml/src/trainers/dqn/trainer/training_loop.rs` — 7 dispatch arms in `reset_named_state` (the 3 TrainingPersist names are not dispatched)

All 10 registry tests + the global registry coverage test pass: `cargo test -p ml --lib state_reset_registry`.