jgrusewski 286ea26e2a perf(ml-alpha): warp-shuffle reduce in per-horizon kernels
Cluster A/B sweep with C25 wiring showed 86 s/epoch vs 17 s/epoch
baseline = ~5x regression. Root cause: per-horizon attention pool +
residual head used block tree-reduce with 8 __syncthreads per K-step
in a serialised K-loop, repeated H=5 times in both fwd and bwd =
~3200 barriers/step. Plus the prob_blend bwd reduce kernel ran with
a single thread per block, fully serialising over K*B.

Replacements:
- per_horizon_attention_pool fwd/bwd: introduce block_reduce_sum /
  block_reduce_max helpers using intra-warp __shfl_xor_sync +
  cross-warp shuffle (1 syncthread per K instead of 8). Smem shrinks
  to [K + N_WARPS] / [2K + N_WARPS].
- per_horizon_residual_head fwd: same warp-shuffle reduce pattern.
- per_horizon_prob_blend_reduce_alpha_residual: 1 thread → 1 warp
  per horizon, lane-strided reduction over K*B via shfl_xor_sync.
  Launch config updated to block_dim=(32,1,1).

Tricky bug found while implementing: the cross-warp reduce in the
residual head originally guarded `__shfl_xor_sync(0xffffffff, ...)`
with `if (tid < PHR_N_WARPS)`, leaving 28 of 32 lanes in warp 0
outside the call. Mask 0xffffffff requires all 32 lanes to
participate — divergence is UB and hung the full-pipeline smoke on
Ampere/Ada. Fix: read s_warp via ternary into all 32 lanes, then
shuffle inside `if (tid < 32)`. Matches the pattern used in
block_reduce_sum.

Verified locally on RTX 3050 (sm_86): per_horizon_attention_pool
numgrad, per_horizon_residual_head numgrad, and
per_horizon_full_pipeline_smoke (zero-init identity + non-zero
end-to-end) all PASS.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-18 13:15:33 +02:00

Foxhunt

Production HFT trading system in Rust.

Architecture

The workspace contains 32 crates organized as follows:

Core Libraries (16)

Crate Purpose
trading_engine Order processing, FIX 4.4, IB TWS, SIMD, RDTSC timing
risk VaR, Kelly, circuit breakers, kill switches, compliance
risk-data Risk data types and shared structures
trading-data Trading data types
ml DQN Rainbow, PPO, TFT, Mamba2, ensemble inference
ml-data ML data types and feature definitions
data Market data ingestion and storage
backtesting Replay engine, strategy tester
adaptive-strategy Ensemble execution, microstructure analysis
common Shared types, resilience, error handling
storage S3 and local model storage
model_loader Model serialization and loading
market-data Market data feed handlers
database PostgreSQL access layer (SQLx)
config Configuration management
tli CLI commands and tooling

Services (8)

Service Purpose
backtesting_service gRPC backtesting service
broker_gateway_service FIX routing, broker connectivity
trading_service Core trading operations
ml_training_service Model training orchestration
data_acquisition_service Market data acquisition
trading_agent_service Autonomous trading agents
api_gateway gRPC API gateway with auth
web-gateway Axum REST + WebSocket gateway

Frontend

web-dashboard/ -- React 19 + TypeScript + Vite + TradingView charts.

Building

# Check compilation (no PostgreSQL required)
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo check --workspace

# Run tests for a specific crate
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo test -p <crate> --lib

# Clippy
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo clippy --workspace

ML Models

Four production model architectures on Candle v0.9.1 with CUDA:

  • DQN Rainbow -- Deep Q-Network with prioritized replay, dueling heads, noisy nets
  • PPO -- Proximal Policy Optimization with GAE and LSTM policies
  • TFT -- Temporal Fusion Transformer for multi-horizon forecasting
  • Mamba2 -- State space model for sequence prediction

Each model has a standalone trainer and a UnifiedTrainable adapter for the hyperopt pipeline.

Infrastructure

  • Git: Gitea at git.fxhnt.ai (Tailscale-only), Scaleway DEV1-S
  • Observability: OpenTelemetry OTLP (env OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT)
  • Database: PostgreSQL with SQLx offline mode for CI

License

Proprietary. All rights reserved.

Description
No description provided
Readme 849 MiB
Languages
Rust 88.2%
Cuda 7.7%
Python 1.3%
Shell 1.1%
PLpgSQL 0.8%
Other 0.8%