3737feb664
Two coordinated architectural fixes addressing the deepest blockers
exposed by the audit:
## Option B: π-driven action selection
Per `pearl_q_thompson_actor_makes_pi_dead_weight`: the prior
architecture had Q acting as BOTH actor (via Thompson sample) AND
critic (via Bellman target). π trained by PPO surrogate against
Q's actions but never drove any decision — `q_pi_agree_ema`
decayed to 0 by step 5000 in every smoke because π converged to
Q's Thompson SAMPLING distribution, not Q's argmax. π was
dead-weight: 4 dedicated controllers (ε, ratio_clamp,
entropy_coef, KL EMA), shared encoder gradient interference, and
zero contribution to actor decisions.
### New kernel: rl_pi_action_kernel.cu
Single-thread-per-batch CUDA kernel that:
1. Computes numerically-stable softmax(pi_logits[b, :])
2. Draws u ∈ [0, 1) from per-batch xorshift32 PRNG
3. CDF-walks to pick the multinomial-sampled action
Per-batch xorshift32 PRNG state is the SAME `prng_state_d` buffer
already used by rl_action_kernel — no new state needed. Sampling
deterministic given (seed, b_size, pi_logits).
### Trainer wiring (1 site change in step_with_lobsim)
Replaced `rl_action_kernel(q_logits, atom_supports, ...)`
(Q-Thompson) with `rl_pi_action_kernel(pi_logits, ...)`
(π-multinomial). The argmax_expected_q call on h_{t+1} is
unchanged — Q remains the critic via canonical Double-DQN target.
PPO importance-ratio surrogate now has its canonical actor-critic
semantics: π_new(a|s) / π_old(a|s) where `a` was actually sampled
from π_old. Was nonsensical before (a was sampled from Q-Thompson,
not π, so the ratio measured something incoherent).
The rl_action_kernel (Q-Thompson) cubin + function field are kept
loaded for backward-compat tests and diagnostic comparison; no
longer in the hot path.
## b_size: 1 → 16
Per `pearl_b_size_1_signal_starvation_blocks_q_learning`: at
b_size=1 with 11% done-step rate and 70% loss rate per trade, Q
stayed at uniform baseline ln(21)=3.04 across all 16+ smokes
regardless of controller fixes. The architecture was structurally
signal-starved — 1 gradient sample per Adam step is fundamentally
too noisy.
LobSimCuda already supports b_size>1 (n_backtests parameter at
`crates/ml-backtesting/src/sim/mod.rs:355`). Trainer code is
already b_size-parametric throughout. The blocker was just the
CLI default at `--n-backtests=1`.
Default bumped to 16 (matches the doc note "production sweep at
32-64; L40S 48GB"). 16× more gradient samples per Adam step
gives Q proper batch variance reduction. The K-loop multiplier
(`isv[404]/2048`) will likely settle at K=1 since the
advantage_var_ratio drops with batch size.
## Expected behaviour
* `q_pi_agree_ema` becomes tautological/dropped (π IS the
policy now — comparing argmax(Q) to argmax(π) doesn't measure
a real consistency invariant any more)
* π gradient flows naturally drive π toward an actor that
optimises the PPO surrogate — Q's encoder gradient is no
longer competing with a different policy's gradient
* l_q should drop meaningfully below 3.04 for the first time
(was stuck at 2.7-2.9 across all prior smokes)
* reward/trade should approach 0 (was -$0.5 to -$0.8 across
every prior run)
* Wall-clock per env step ~16× slower (b_size=16) but training
cost per gradient step similar (denser sample = more
progress per step)
## Verified gates (local sm_86)
G1 isv_bootstrap ✅
G3 controllers ✅
G4 target_update ✅
integrated_smoke ✅
## Caveat: integrated_trainer_smoke runs at b_size=1
The default for the CLI is bumped to 16, but the local
`integrated_trainer_smoke` test passes its own b_size=1 to
verify the trainer mechanics. Real-world signal verification
happens via cluster smokes which now use b_size=16 by default.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Foxhunt
Production HFT trading system in Rust.
Architecture
The workspace contains 32 crates organized as follows:
Core Libraries (16)
| Crate | Purpose |
|---|---|
trading_engine |
Order processing, FIX 4.4, IB TWS, SIMD, RDTSC timing |
risk |
VaR, Kelly, circuit breakers, kill switches, compliance |
risk-data |
Risk data types and shared structures |
trading-data |
Trading data types |
ml |
DQN Rainbow, PPO, TFT, Mamba2, ensemble inference |
ml-data |
ML data types and feature definitions |
data |
Market data ingestion and storage |
backtesting |
Replay engine, strategy tester |
adaptive-strategy |
Ensemble execution, microstructure analysis |
common |
Shared types, resilience, error handling |
storage |
S3 and local model storage |
model_loader |
Model serialization and loading |
market-data |
Market data feed handlers |
database |
PostgreSQL access layer (SQLx) |
config |
Configuration management |
tli |
CLI commands and tooling |
Services (8)
| Service | Purpose |
|---|---|
backtesting_service |
gRPC backtesting service |
broker_gateway_service |
FIX routing, broker connectivity |
trading_service |
Core trading operations |
ml_training_service |
Model training orchestration |
data_acquisition_service |
Market data acquisition |
trading_agent_service |
Autonomous trading agents |
api_gateway |
gRPC API gateway with auth |
web-gateway |
Axum REST + WebSocket gateway |
Frontend
web-dashboard/ -- React 19 + TypeScript + Vite + TradingView charts.
Building
# Check compilation (no PostgreSQL required)
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo check --workspace
# Run tests for a specific crate
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo test -p <crate> --lib
# Clippy
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo clippy --workspace
ML Models
Four production model architectures on Candle v0.9.1 with CUDA:
- DQN Rainbow -- Deep Q-Network with prioritized replay, dueling heads, noisy nets
- PPO -- Proximal Policy Optimization with GAE and LSTM policies
- TFT -- Temporal Fusion Transformer for multi-horizon forecasting
- Mamba2 -- State space model for sequence prediction
Each model has a standalone trainer and a UnifiedTrainable adapter for the hyperopt pipeline.
Infrastructure
- Git: Gitea at
git.fxhnt.ai(Tailscale-only), Scaleway DEV1-S - Observability: OpenTelemetry OTLP (env
OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT) - Database: PostgreSQL with SQLx offline mode for CI
License
Proprietary. All rights reserved.