jgrusewski 54aa69c108 spec(perf): K-loop block-per-batch parallelization design
Documents the design for fixing the single-SM bottleneck in five
backward/K-loop kernels: cfc_step (fwd+bwd), GRN bwd, VSN bwd, and
attention_pool bwd. All currently use grid=(1,1,1) with an internal
n_batch loop — on L40S (142 SMs) with B=32 this puts <1% of the GPU
to work in the K-loop critical path.

Architecture: block-per-batch (grid=(B,1,1)) for the kernel body, plus
per-batch grad scratch buffers reduced via a single parameterised
reduce_axis0 kernel (block tree-reduce, no atomicAdd per
feedback_no_atomicadd.md). Same pattern as the existing LayerNorm bwd
reducer — CUDA-Graph-safe, debuggable, and consistent with foxhunt's
no-cooperative-groups discipline.

Target: ≥3× epoch wall speedup (stretch 8-15×). Makes 3-fold CV
tractable (10.5h → 2-3h) and unblocks decision-stride / state-dim
sweeps that compound the gain.

Acceptance gates: (a) all 8 perception_overfit smokes still converge,
(b) new B=1 bit-equivalence test asserts the refactored batched bwd
kernel at B=1 matches the existing single-sample helper byte-for-byte,
(c) cluster A/B vs t6z89 baseline shows AUC trajectory within ±0.005
and epoch wall ≥3× faster.

Atomic refactor per kernel — one commit per kernel covering the
kernel rewrite, scratch buffer alloc, reducer launch wiring, and
smoke. No "_legacy" parallel kernels per feedback_no_legacy_aliases.md
+ feedback_no_partial_refactor.md.

Open implementation-plan decisions: exact memset_zeros ordering inside
the captured graph, batch-vs-per-tensor reducer launches, optimal
block_dim for reduce_axis0 itself.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-17 23:06:28 +02:00

Foxhunt

Production HFT trading system in Rust.

Architecture

The workspace contains 32 crates organized as follows:

Core Libraries (16)

Crate Purpose
trading_engine Order processing, FIX 4.4, IB TWS, SIMD, RDTSC timing
risk VaR, Kelly, circuit breakers, kill switches, compliance
risk-data Risk data types and shared structures
trading-data Trading data types
ml DQN Rainbow, PPO, TFT, Mamba2, ensemble inference
ml-data ML data types and feature definitions
data Market data ingestion and storage
backtesting Replay engine, strategy tester
adaptive-strategy Ensemble execution, microstructure analysis
common Shared types, resilience, error handling
storage S3 and local model storage
model_loader Model serialization and loading
market-data Market data feed handlers
database PostgreSQL access layer (SQLx)
config Configuration management
tli CLI commands and tooling

Services (8)

Service Purpose
backtesting_service gRPC backtesting service
broker_gateway_service FIX routing, broker connectivity
trading_service Core trading operations
ml_training_service Model training orchestration
data_acquisition_service Market data acquisition
trading_agent_service Autonomous trading agents
api_gateway gRPC API gateway with auth
web-gateway Axum REST + WebSocket gateway

Frontend

web-dashboard/ -- React 19 + TypeScript + Vite + TradingView charts.

Building

# Check compilation (no PostgreSQL required)
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo check --workspace

# Run tests for a specific crate
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo test -p <crate> --lib

# Clippy
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo clippy --workspace

ML Models

Four production model architectures on Candle v0.9.1 with CUDA:

  • DQN Rainbow -- Deep Q-Network with prioritized replay, dueling heads, noisy nets
  • PPO -- Proximal Policy Optimization with GAE and LSTM policies
  • TFT -- Temporal Fusion Transformer for multi-horizon forecasting
  • Mamba2 -- State space model for sequence prediction

Each model has a standalone trainer and a UnifiedTrainable adapter for the hyperopt pipeline.

Infrastructure

  • Git: Gitea at git.fxhnt.ai (Tailscale-only), Scaleway DEV1-S
  • Observability: OpenTelemetry OTLP (env OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT)
  • Database: PostgreSQL with SQLx offline mode for CI

License

Proprietary. All rights reserved.

Description
No description provided
Readme 849 MiB
Languages
Rust 88.2%
Cuda 7.7%
Python 1.3%
Shell 1.1%
PLpgSQL 0.8%
Other 0.8%