5a4d561451
First Task 2.0 dispatch escalated BLOCKED: the four loss-component
backward kernels are captured inside the fused training graph, so
host-side snapshot-between-components isn't possible mid-graph without
a force-ungraphed diagnostic step (~210 LOC + cross-stream sync risk).
Revised approach (chosen after cost analysis):
cudaMemcpyAsync(device → pinned host) IS captureable in a CUDA graph.
Even better: DtoD into per-component scratch buffers, then an in-graph
reduction kernel computes per-component (mag_norm, dir_norm) and writes
8 floats to a pinned result slot. Only the 8-float result crosses
PCIe (at epoch boundary), keeping per-step PCIe traffic to zero.
Changes to the plan's Step 2 + Step 3 + Step 4:
- Step 2: added 4 device-side scratch buffers (one per component,
~10 MB each = 40 MB device) + 8-float pinned result slot + new
reduction kernel grad_decomp_kernel.cu spec'd out.
- Step 3: clarified that DtoD snapshot + backward + reduction kernel
are ALL captured in the graph; graph replays them every step;
no force-ungraphed dance needed.
- Step 4: added refresh_grad_component_norms() accessor that reads
the 8-float pinned slot at epoch boundary (zero-copy) and populates
the host-side cache.
Approach matches Task 0.4 pattern (commit bb42c9963) extended four-fold.
No atomicAdd (reduction uses shared-mem tree), no non-captured replay,
no cross-stream sync risk.
LOC estimate: ~90 (was ~210 for the rejected option).
Foxhunt
Production HFT trading system in Rust.
Architecture
The workspace contains 32 crates organized as follows:
Core Libraries (16)
| Crate | Purpose |
|---|---|
trading_engine |
Order processing, FIX 4.4, IB TWS, SIMD, RDTSC timing |
risk |
VaR, Kelly, circuit breakers, kill switches, compliance |
risk-data |
Risk data types and shared structures |
trading-data |
Trading data types |
ml |
DQN Rainbow, PPO, TFT, Mamba2, ensemble inference |
ml-data |
ML data types and feature definitions |
data |
Market data ingestion and storage |
backtesting |
Replay engine, strategy tester |
adaptive-strategy |
Ensemble execution, microstructure analysis |
common |
Shared types, resilience, error handling |
storage |
S3 and local model storage |
model_loader |
Model serialization and loading |
market-data |
Market data feed handlers |
database |
PostgreSQL access layer (SQLx) |
config |
Configuration management |
tli |
CLI commands and tooling |
Services (8)
| Service | Purpose |
|---|---|
backtesting_service |
gRPC backtesting service |
broker_gateway_service |
FIX routing, broker connectivity |
trading_service |
Core trading operations |
ml_training_service |
Model training orchestration |
data_acquisition_service |
Market data acquisition |
trading_agent_service |
Autonomous trading agents |
api_gateway |
gRPC API gateway with auth |
web-gateway |
Axum REST + WebSocket gateway |
Frontend
web-dashboard/ -- React 19 + TypeScript + Vite + TradingView charts.
Building
# Check compilation (no PostgreSQL required)
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo check --workspace
# Run tests for a specific crate
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo test -p <crate> --lib
# Clippy
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo clippy --workspace
ML Models
Four production model architectures on Candle v0.9.1 with CUDA:
- DQN Rainbow -- Deep Q-Network with prioritized replay, dueling heads, noisy nets
- PPO -- Proximal Policy Optimization with GAE and LSTM policies
- TFT -- Temporal Fusion Transformer for multi-horizon forecasting
- Mamba2 -- State space model for sequence prediction
Each model has a standalone trainer and a UnifiedTrainable adapter for the hyperopt pipeline.
Infrastructure
- Git: Gitea at
git.fxhnt.ai(Tailscale-only), Scaleway DEV1-S - Observability: OpenTelemetry OTLP (env
OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT) - Database: PostgreSQL with SQLx offline mode for CI
License
Proprietary. All rights reserved.