jgrusewski 679881fa53 fix(dqn/c51): clamp adaptive v_range to config bounds — Fold 1 explosion
Root cause of the L40S 10-epoch smoke Fold 1 loss explosion
(train-7r9zf, final_loss=1.6e16, grad_norm=62B): update_eval_v_range
recomputed [v_min, v_max] every epoch from eval_q_mean_ema ± gap_width
with NO upper bound, while the bounded theoretical range in
config.v_min/v_max (derived from reward_scale/(1-gamma)*1.2, clamp [20, 300])
was only honored at buffer initialization.

The runaway path (visible in the epoch-by-epoch trace):

  Epoch 3: Q-range=[-10, 10] — pegged at config bounds ✓
  Epoch 4: Q-range=[-10, 14.16] — Q escapes the configured window
  Epoch 5: Q-range=[-10, 22.30], loss=43,660 (up from 30)
  Epoch 10: loss=1.6e16, grad_norm=62B, Fold 1 converged=false

Positive feedback loop:
  Q overestimate → eval_q_mean_ema drifts up → v_max follows unbounded
  → C51 atom support widens → TD targets grow → Q targets grow
  → network chases → gradient explodes → repeat.

Fold 0 stayed in the safe region only because its reward dynamics never
pushed Q far enough to escape ±10; Fold 1's larger window (3.7M bars vs
2.9M) contained the trigger event.

Fix: gpu_dqn_trainer::update_eval_v_range now clamps BOTH the half-width
to (config.v_max - config.v_min) / 2 AND the centre to the range
[config.v_min + half, config.v_max - half], guaranteeing the adaptive
window always fits inside the theoretical bounds. Single source of truth
— the config-level clamp is now actually authoritative.

Verified: multi-trial smoke 5/5 pass, median_q_gap=2.07 (beats 2.00
baseline from commit cb2015ab2), mean_sharpe_ema=7.82. No regression on
Fold 0's normal-range behaviour.

Closes task #31.
2026-04-21 17:53:38 +02:00

Foxhunt

Production HFT trading system in Rust.

Architecture

The workspace contains 32 crates organized as follows:

Core Libraries (16)

Crate Purpose
trading_engine Order processing, FIX 4.4, IB TWS, SIMD, RDTSC timing
risk VaR, Kelly, circuit breakers, kill switches, compliance
risk-data Risk data types and shared structures
trading-data Trading data types
ml DQN Rainbow, PPO, TFT, Mamba2, ensemble inference
ml-data ML data types and feature definitions
data Market data ingestion and storage
backtesting Replay engine, strategy tester
adaptive-strategy Ensemble execution, microstructure analysis
common Shared types, resilience, error handling
storage S3 and local model storage
model_loader Model serialization and loading
market-data Market data feed handlers
database PostgreSQL access layer (SQLx)
config Configuration management
tli CLI commands and tooling

Services (8)

Service Purpose
backtesting_service gRPC backtesting service
broker_gateway_service FIX routing, broker connectivity
trading_service Core trading operations
ml_training_service Model training orchestration
data_acquisition_service Market data acquisition
trading_agent_service Autonomous trading agents
api_gateway gRPC API gateway with auth
web-gateway Axum REST + WebSocket gateway

Frontend

web-dashboard/ -- React 19 + TypeScript + Vite + TradingView charts.

Building

# Check compilation (no PostgreSQL required)
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo check --workspace

# Run tests for a specific crate
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo test -p <crate> --lib

# Clippy
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo clippy --workspace

ML Models

Four production model architectures on Candle v0.9.1 with CUDA:

  • DQN Rainbow -- Deep Q-Network with prioritized replay, dueling heads, noisy nets
  • PPO -- Proximal Policy Optimization with GAE and LSTM policies
  • TFT -- Temporal Fusion Transformer for multi-horizon forecasting
  • Mamba2 -- State space model for sequence prediction

Each model has a standalone trainer and a UnifiedTrainable adapter for the hyperopt pipeline.

Infrastructure

  • Git: Gitea at git.fxhnt.ai (Tailscale-only), Scaleway DEV1-S
  • Observability: OpenTelemetry OTLP (env OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT)
  • Database: PostgreSQL with SQLx offline mode for CI

License

Proprietary. All rights reserved.

Description
No description provided
Readme 849 MiB
Languages
Rust 88.2%
Cuda 7.7%
Python 1.3%
Shell 1.1%
PLpgSQL 0.8%
Other 0.8%