jgrusewski 737c2c1305 infra(argo): pin all workflow nodeSelectors to topology.kubernetes.io/zone=fr-par-2
Scaleway BSSD PVCs (cargo-target-*, sccache-*, feature-cache-pvc,
bin-cache, training-data-pvc, test-data-pvc, platform service PVCs) are
single-zone-locked at create time. The cluster's node pools in main.tf
set `region` but no `zone`, so each autoscale event picks a zone
arbitrarily. When the autoscaler spins up a node in a zone that doesn't
match an existing PVC, scheduling fails with
  "1 node(s) didn't match PersistentVolume's node affinity"
until the autoscaler eventually retries in the right zone. We hit this
on the HM pool creation (fixed manually with zone=fr-par-2) and again
on this commit's ensure-binary autoscale.

Track 1 (this commit): add `topology.kubernetes.io/zone: fr-par-2` to
every k8s.scaleway.com/pool-name nodeSelector entry across the 11 argo
workflow templates (34 entries total). The Kubernetes scheduler AND
cluster-autoscaler both honor topology keys when deciding placement /
provisioning — so future autoscale events will only spin up fr-par-2
nodes, and PVC binding is guaranteed.

Track 2 (future, structural): add `zone = "${var.region}-2"` to each
scaleway_k8s_pool in infra/modules/kapsule/main.tf so the pools never
provision in any other zone. Requires terraform-state cleanup (the
GitLab http backend currently has no states; the HM pool was created
out-of-band) and drain/recreate of any existing mixed-zone nodes —
deferred.

Verification: pool=N / paired=N coverage report shows 1:1 pool-name
to topology.kubernetes.io/zone entries in every file. kubectl apply -f
of all 11 templates returned "configured" for each.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-16 15:08:37 +02:00

Foxhunt

Production HFT trading system in Rust.

Architecture

The workspace contains 32 crates organized as follows:

Core Libraries (16)

Crate Purpose
trading_engine Order processing, FIX 4.4, IB TWS, SIMD, RDTSC timing
risk VaR, Kelly, circuit breakers, kill switches, compliance
risk-data Risk data types and shared structures
trading-data Trading data types
ml DQN Rainbow, PPO, TFT, Mamba2, ensemble inference
ml-data ML data types and feature definitions
data Market data ingestion and storage
backtesting Replay engine, strategy tester
adaptive-strategy Ensemble execution, microstructure analysis
common Shared types, resilience, error handling
storage S3 and local model storage
model_loader Model serialization and loading
market-data Market data feed handlers
database PostgreSQL access layer (SQLx)
config Configuration management
tli CLI commands and tooling

Services (8)

Service Purpose
backtesting_service gRPC backtesting service
broker_gateway_service FIX routing, broker connectivity
trading_service Core trading operations
ml_training_service Model training orchestration
data_acquisition_service Market data acquisition
trading_agent_service Autonomous trading agents
api_gateway gRPC API gateway with auth
web-gateway Axum REST + WebSocket gateway

Frontend

web-dashboard/ -- React 19 + TypeScript + Vite + TradingView charts.

Building

# Check compilation (no PostgreSQL required)
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo check --workspace

# Run tests for a specific crate
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo test -p <crate> --lib

# Clippy
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo clippy --workspace

ML Models

Four production model architectures on Candle v0.9.1 with CUDA:

  • DQN Rainbow -- Deep Q-Network with prioritized replay, dueling heads, noisy nets
  • PPO -- Proximal Policy Optimization with GAE and LSTM policies
  • TFT -- Temporal Fusion Transformer for multi-horizon forecasting
  • Mamba2 -- State space model for sequence prediction

Each model has a standalone trainer and a UnifiedTrainable adapter for the hyperopt pipeline.

Infrastructure

  • Git: Gitea at git.fxhnt.ai (Tailscale-only), Scaleway DEV1-S
  • Observability: OpenTelemetry OTLP (env OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT)
  • Database: PostgreSQL with SQLx offline mode for CI

License

Proprietary. All rights reserved.

Description
No description provided
Readme 849 MiB
Languages
Rust 88.2%
Cuda 7.7%
Python 1.3%
Shell 1.1%
PLpgSQL 0.8%
Other 0.8%