jgrusewski 872bd73927 fix(aux-head): stop-gradient on aux's h_s2 input — fixes aux-loss-rises-during-training pathology
Root cause from train-v8ztm 9-epoch HEALTH_DIAG aux next_bar_mse trajectory:
- Ep 0: 0.352 (learnable signal — below random baseline ln(2)≈0.693)
- Ep 9: 0.717 (above random baseline — aux is now WORSE than random)
- aux_dir_acc_long stuck at 0.19 (anti-correlated with truth)

Aux head's backward gradient was flowing back to shared trunk activation
h_s2 via dh_s2_out write at aux_heads_kernel.cu:599-613. Q-loss
gradient on h_s2 dominates (larger magnitude, structurally different
objective: cumulative discounted reward vs next-bar direction). h_s2
evolves to support Q's task; aux's CE loss climbs as h_s2 features
become anti-aligned with direction prediction.

Fix: stop-gradient. Aux reads h_s2 via forward, trains its own w1/b1/w2/b2
from CE loss, but does NOT propagate to h_s2. Q-loss is the sole shaping
force on h_s2. Aux must adapt to whatever h_s2 happens to be — if the
representation has direction signal, aux's params will extract it; if
not, aux can't learn (separate-trunk Option 2 deferred for that case).

This was the SEVENTH fix in today's chain (after 6 SP14 EGF cadence/
gate/saturation fixes). The EGF was a scaffold over a broken aux head;
fixing aux first is the architectural prerequisite for EGF to route
useful signal.

Verification: cargo check clean; sp14_oracle_tests 7/7 pass.
Validation: aux next_bar_mse should now DECREASE during training in
the next L40S smoke (vs the rising-from-0.35-to-0.72 pattern in v8ztm).

Deferred follow-up: aux_regime_backward has the same architecture
(propagates dh_s2 to trunk). Same fix is a candidate once next_bar
result validates the approach.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-07 22:49:37 +02:00

Foxhunt

Production HFT trading system in Rust.

Architecture

The workspace contains 32 crates organized as follows:

Core Libraries (16)

Crate Purpose
trading_engine Order processing, FIX 4.4, IB TWS, SIMD, RDTSC timing
risk VaR, Kelly, circuit breakers, kill switches, compliance
risk-data Risk data types and shared structures
trading-data Trading data types
ml DQN Rainbow, PPO, TFT, Mamba2, ensemble inference
ml-data ML data types and feature definitions
data Market data ingestion and storage
backtesting Replay engine, strategy tester
adaptive-strategy Ensemble execution, microstructure analysis
common Shared types, resilience, error handling
storage S3 and local model storage
model_loader Model serialization and loading
market-data Market data feed handlers
database PostgreSQL access layer (SQLx)
config Configuration management
tli CLI commands and tooling

Services (8)

Service Purpose
backtesting_service gRPC backtesting service
broker_gateway_service FIX routing, broker connectivity
trading_service Core trading operations
ml_training_service Model training orchestration
data_acquisition_service Market data acquisition
trading_agent_service Autonomous trading agents
api_gateway gRPC API gateway with auth
web-gateway Axum REST + WebSocket gateway

Frontend

web-dashboard/ -- React 19 + TypeScript + Vite + TradingView charts.

Building

# Check compilation (no PostgreSQL required)
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo check --workspace

# Run tests for a specific crate
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo test -p <crate> --lib

# Clippy
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo clippy --workspace

ML Models

Four production model architectures on Candle v0.9.1 with CUDA:

  • DQN Rainbow -- Deep Q-Network with prioritized replay, dueling heads, noisy nets
  • PPO -- Proximal Policy Optimization with GAE and LSTM policies
  • TFT -- Temporal Fusion Transformer for multi-horizon forecasting
  • Mamba2 -- State space model for sequence prediction

Each model has a standalone trainer and a UnifiedTrainable adapter for the hyperopt pipeline.

Infrastructure

  • Git: Gitea at git.fxhnt.ai (Tailscale-only), Scaleway DEV1-S
  • Observability: OpenTelemetry OTLP (env OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT)
  • Database: PostgreSQL with SQLx offline mode for CI

License

Proprietary. All rights reserved.

Description
No description provided
Readme 849 MiB
Languages
Rust 88.2%
Cuda 7.7%
Python 1.3%
Shell 1.1%
PLpgSQL 0.8%
Other 0.8%