**Wave D Phase 6 - Technical Debt Cleanup (Agent C6)** ## Changes - Identified deprecated code patterns across codebase - Analyzed mock repository usage (strategically retained per AGENT_M13) - Documented deprecation cleanup strategy - Prepared deprecation removal todos ## Analysis Results - Mock structs: RETAINED (strategic testing infrastructure) - Never-read fields: 2 instances in backtesting_service - Dead code warnings: 35 total across workspace - databento_old references: None found in active code ## Status - ✅ Deprecation analysis complete - ⏳ Cleanup execution pending user confirmation - 📊 Test impact assessment ready 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
171 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
171 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
# AGENT COVERAGE-01: Quick Summary
|
||
**Status**: ✅ Complete | **Current Coverage**: 47% | **Target**: >60% | **Timeline**: 9 weeks
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🎯 Key Findings
|
||
|
||
### Critical Gaps (🔴 IMMEDIATE RISK)
|
||
- **8 trading/risk core modules**: 11,737 lines, **ZERO tests**
|
||
- **Compliance modules**: 6,466 lines untested → regulatory risk
|
||
- **data_acquisition_service**: Only 2 tests total
|
||
- **storage crate**: Only 64 tests (needs 80+)
|
||
|
||
### Test Distribution
|
||
```
|
||
ML crate: 2,512 tests ✅ EXCELLENT
|
||
Common crate: 689 tests ✅ GOOD
|
||
Trading Engine: 1,107 tests ✅ GOOD
|
||
Config crate: 417 tests ✅ GOOD
|
||
Data crate: 519 tests ✅ GOOD
|
||
Risk crate: 581 tests ⚠️ FAIR
|
||
Storage: 64 tests 🔴 LOW
|
||
Services: 724 tests ⚠️ GAPS
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 📋 3-Phase Test Generation Plan
|
||
|
||
### Phase 1: Critical Trading Paths (4 weeks, 1,310 tests)
|
||
**Coverage: 47% → 54%**
|
||
|
||
**Week 1-2: Trading Service Core** (710 tests)
|
||
- risk_manager.rs: 200 tests
|
||
- order_manager.rs: 180 tests
|
||
- execution_engine.rs: 150 tests
|
||
- position_manager.rs: 180 tests
|
||
|
||
**Week 3-4: Risk & Compliance** (600 tests)
|
||
- position_tracker.rs: 250 tests
|
||
- iso27001_compliance.rs: 200 tests
|
||
- compliance_reporting.rs: 150 tests
|
||
|
||
**Effort**: 160 hours (4 weeks × 40 hrs)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Phase 2: ML Infrastructure (3 weeks, 530 tests)
|
||
**Coverage: 54% → 58%**
|
||
|
||
**Week 5-6: ML Training** (260 tests)
|
||
- orchestrator.rs: 120 tests
|
||
- data_loader.rs: 140 tests
|
||
|
||
**Week 7: ML Safety** (270 tests)
|
||
- drift_detector.rs: 100 tests
|
||
- hot_swap.rs: 90 tests
|
||
- endpoints.rs: 80 tests
|
||
|
||
**Effort**: 120 hours (3 weeks × 40 hrs)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Phase 3: Data & Infrastructure (2 weeks, 300 tests)
|
||
**Coverage: 58% → 61%+**
|
||
|
||
**Week 8: Backtesting** (160 tests)
|
||
- dbn_repository.rs: 90 tests
|
||
- dbn_data_source.rs: 70 tests
|
||
|
||
**Week 9: Storage** (140 tests)
|
||
- storage crate: +16 tests (64→80)
|
||
- data_acquisition_service: +58 tests (2→60)
|
||
|
||
**Effort**: 80 hours (2 weeks × 40 hrs)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 📊 Coverage Projection
|
||
|
||
| Phase | Tests Added | Total Tests | Coverage | Weeks |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| Current | - | 6,600 | **47%** | - |
|
||
| Phase 1 | +1,310 | 7,910 | **54%** | 1-4 |
|
||
| Phase 2 | +530 | 8,440 | **58%** | 5-7 |
|
||
| Phase 3 | +300 | 8,740 | **61%+** | 8-9 |
|
||
|
||
**Total**: 2,140 new tests, 360 hours, 9 weeks
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## ⚡ Immediate Actions (Week 1)
|
||
|
||
1. **Fix SQLx Offline Errors** (4 hours)
|
||
```bash
|
||
cargo sqlx prepare --workspace
|
||
cargo test -p common wave_d_regime_tracking
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
2. **Start P1-CRITICAL Tests** (40 hours/week)
|
||
- Priority: `trading_service/core/risk_manager.rs`
|
||
- Parallel: `risk/position_tracker.rs`
|
||
|
||
3. **Compliance Baseline** (8 hours)
|
||
- Smoke tests for iso27001_compliance.rs
|
||
- Format validation for compliance_reporting.rs
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🎯 Success Metrics
|
||
|
||
### Quality Gates
|
||
- ❌ No PR merge if coverage drops >2%
|
||
- ✅ P1 modules: 70%+ coverage by Week 4
|
||
- ✅ Service modules: 60%+ coverage by Week 9
|
||
|
||
### Weekly Checkpoints
|
||
```bash
|
||
# Generate coverage report
|
||
cargo llvm-cov --workspace --html --output-dir coverage_week_N
|
||
|
||
# Per-crate analysis
|
||
cargo llvm-cov -p trading_service --html --output-dir coverage_trading
|
||
cargo llvm-cov -p ml_training_service --html --output-dir coverage_ml_training
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 📦 Resource Requirements
|
||
|
||
**Personnel**:
|
||
- 1 Senior Test Engineer (Rust + Trading experience)
|
||
- 0.5 FTE Code Reviewer
|
||
|
||
**Infrastructure**:
|
||
- Test database instance
|
||
- +30 min CI/CD time per run
|
||
- ~50GB Databento test data
|
||
|
||
**Dependencies**:
|
||
- SQLx offline cache setup
|
||
- 4-asset test fixtures (ES, NQ, 6E, ZN)
|
||
- Mock Databento API
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🚨 Risk Assessment
|
||
|
||
**Current Risk**: 🔴 **HIGH**
|
||
- Untested critical paths in production trading systems
|
||
- Potential for capital loss, regulatory violations, system failures
|
||
|
||
**After Phase 1**: 🟡 **MEDIUM**
|
||
- Critical trading/risk paths tested (70%+ coverage)
|
||
- Regulatory compliance validated
|
||
|
||
**After Phase 3**: 🟢 **LOW**
|
||
- 61%+ overall coverage
|
||
- All critical paths protected
|
||
- Production-ready quality gates
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 📄 Full Report
|
||
|
||
See: `AGENT_COVERAGE_01_ANALYSIS_REPORT.md` (detailed breakdown, test specifications, risk analysis)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
**Agent**: COVERAGE-01 | **Deliverables**: 2 reports, 3-phase plan, 2,140 test specifications
|