Files
foxhunt/AGENT_G9_QUICK_REFERENCE.md
jgrusewski 86afdb714d feat(wave-d): Complete Phase 6 agents G15-G19 - memory optimization + performance validation
- G15: Ring buffer memory optimization (2.87 GB reduction target)
- G16: Memory validation (identified gaps in initial implementation)
- G17: Complete memory optimization (fixed RingBuffer design, lazy allocation)
- G18: Performance benchmarks (12% faster average, zero regression)
- G19: Profiling validation (5μs P50 latency, 99.6% fewer allocations)

Production readiness: 92%
Test coverage: 34/36 tests passing (94.4%)
Memory savings: 66% reduction (2.87 GB for 100K symbols)
Performance: 5-40% improvement across all benchmarks

Modified files:
- ml/src/features/normalization.rs (RingBuffer implementation)
- ml/src/features/pipeline.rs (lazy bars allocation)
- ml/src/features/volume_features.rs (lazy allocation)
- adaptive-strategy/src/ensemble/weight_optimizer.rs (regime Sharpe)
- ml/src/tft/mod.rs (225-feature support)
2025-10-18 18:14:34 +02:00

111 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown

# Agent G9: TFT 225-Feature Update - Quick Reference
**Status**: ✅ COMPLETE
**Date**: 2025-10-18
---
## What Changed
### 1. Training Script (`ml/examples/train_tft_dbn.rs`)
- ✅ Added `FeatureConfig::wave_d()` initialization
- ✅ Updated `convert_to_tft_data()` to accept feature config
- ✅ Changed historical features from 50 → 225 per timestep
- ✅ Updated array shape: `(lookback_window, 50)``(lookback_window, 225)`
- ✅ Added Wave D features (indices 201-224, 24 features)
### 2. Trainer Config (`ml/src/trainers/tft.rs`)
- ✅ Updated `num_unknown_features: 50``225`
- ✅ Updated checkpoint naming: `tft_epoch_{}``tft_225_epoch_{}`
---
## Feature Breakdown (225 Total)
| Range | Category | Count | Description |
|-------|----------|-------|-------------|
| 0-200 | Wave C | 201 | OHLCV, technicals, microstructure, statistical |
| 201-210 | CUSUM | 10 | Structural break detection |
| 211-215 | ADX | 5 | Directional indicators |
| 216-220 | Transitions | 5 | Regime transition probabilities |
| 221-224 | Adaptive | 4 | Position sizing, stop-loss, Sharpe |
---
## Run Commands
```bash
# Compile check
cargo check -p ml --example train_tft_dbn
# Test compilation
cargo test -p ml --example train_tft_dbn --no-run
# Training (20 epochs, default)
cargo run -p ml --example train_tft_dbn --release
# Custom training
cargo run -p ml --example train_tft_dbn --release -- \
--epochs 50 \
--batch-size 32 \
--lookback 60 \
--horizon 10
```
---
## Validation Checklist
- ✅ Zero compilation errors
- ✅ Feature count: 225 (verified via `feature_config.feature_count()`)
- ✅ Historical features shape: `[60, 225]`
- ✅ Checkpoint naming: `tft_225_epoch_{epoch}.safetensors`
- ✅ Tests updated: `test_convert_to_tft_format()`
---
## Expected Output
```
Configuration:
• Feature count: 225 (Wave D: Wave C 201 + Wave D 24)
• Hidden dimension: 256
• Lookback window: 60
• Forecast horizon: 10
```
---
## Files Modified
1. `ml/examples/train_tft_dbn.rs` (~150 lines)
2. `ml/src/trainers/tft.rs` (2 lines)
---
## Next Steps
1. **Dry run**: `cargo run -p ml --example train_tft_dbn --release -- --epochs 1`
2. **Full training**: 50 epochs on ES.FUT data
3. **Multi-symbol**: Train on ES.FUT, NQ.FUT, 6E.FUT, ZN.FUT
4. **Replace proxies**: Integrate real regime features (Agents D13-D16)
---
## Key Metrics
- **Compilation**: ✅ 0 errors, 66 warnings (non-critical)
- **Input dimension**: 225 features (4.5x from 50)
- **Expected inference**: ~3.5ms (target: <5ms)
- **Expected GPU memory**: ~180MB training (440MB total budget)
---
## Notes
⚠️ Wave D features (201-224) are currently **proxy features** derived from OHLCV. They will be replaced with actual regime detection features from Agents D13-D16 in Phase 4.
---
**Report**: `AGENT_G9_TFT_225_FEATURES_IMPLEMENTATION_REPORT.md`