jgrusewski a683d62771 perf(alpha_pipeline): parallelize via N-chunk warm-up pattern
Cluster's 9-quarter precompute_features hung silently after the
"alpha pipeline inputs" log line and was killed at ~75 minutes — local
1Q profiling showed the alpha pipeline is strictly single-threaded
(extract_alpha_features is one for-loop over n_output bars with no
rayon usage), so 9Q would have needed ~72 min on one CPU even with no
external interference. That's a kill window large enough to be brittle
under any transient kubelet/argo signal.

Fix: split the emit range across `rayon::current_num_threads()` chunks.
Each chunk gets fresh aggregator state and pre-rolls 2000 leading bars
without emission so Hawkes excitation / Bouchaud EMA / frac-diff FIR /
LOB PCA covariance / microprice EMA / spread_decomp running stats are
saturated before the first emitted row. Trade-feed semantics preserved
via `trades.partition_point` seeding per chunk — each trade still
visits exactly one aggregator chain.

Local 1Q ES benchmark (9-core box):
- before: 2:19 wall, 101% CPU (1 core)
- after:  0:27 wall, 915% CPU (9 cores)
- 5.1× speedup; same row count + Alpha dim 134 + 468MB output

Extrapolated 9Q on cluster's 32-vCPU HM pool: ~4-5 min for the alpha
portion (vs ~72 min before). Well under any plausible kill window.

Numerical caveat: not bit-identical to a fully-sequential run for
chunks k > 0. Aggregators initialise at default state instead of
carrying real history across the chunk seam; the 2000-bar warmup
refills Hawkes's 500-event history twice over and saturates the
longer-memory EMAs, so post-warmup drift is bounded by floating-point
ε. The two existing in-crate unit tests (`test_extract_alpha_features_*`)
still pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-16 14:53:48 +02:00

Foxhunt

Production HFT trading system in Rust.

Architecture

The workspace contains 32 crates organized as follows:

Core Libraries (16)

Crate Purpose
trading_engine Order processing, FIX 4.4, IB TWS, SIMD, RDTSC timing
risk VaR, Kelly, circuit breakers, kill switches, compliance
risk-data Risk data types and shared structures
trading-data Trading data types
ml DQN Rainbow, PPO, TFT, Mamba2, ensemble inference
ml-data ML data types and feature definitions
data Market data ingestion and storage
backtesting Replay engine, strategy tester
adaptive-strategy Ensemble execution, microstructure analysis
common Shared types, resilience, error handling
storage S3 and local model storage
model_loader Model serialization and loading
market-data Market data feed handlers
database PostgreSQL access layer (SQLx)
config Configuration management
tli CLI commands and tooling

Services (8)

Service Purpose
backtesting_service gRPC backtesting service
broker_gateway_service FIX routing, broker connectivity
trading_service Core trading operations
ml_training_service Model training orchestration
data_acquisition_service Market data acquisition
trading_agent_service Autonomous trading agents
api_gateway gRPC API gateway with auth
web-gateway Axum REST + WebSocket gateway

Frontend

web-dashboard/ -- React 19 + TypeScript + Vite + TradingView charts.

Building

# Check compilation (no PostgreSQL required)
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo check --workspace

# Run tests for a specific crate
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo test -p <crate> --lib

# Clippy
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo clippy --workspace

ML Models

Four production model architectures on Candle v0.9.1 with CUDA:

  • DQN Rainbow -- Deep Q-Network with prioritized replay, dueling heads, noisy nets
  • PPO -- Proximal Policy Optimization with GAE and LSTM policies
  • TFT -- Temporal Fusion Transformer for multi-horizon forecasting
  • Mamba2 -- State space model for sequence prediction

Each model has a standalone trainer and a UnifiedTrainable adapter for the hyperopt pipeline.

Infrastructure

  • Git: Gitea at git.fxhnt.ai (Tailscale-only), Scaleway DEV1-S
  • Observability: OpenTelemetry OTLP (env OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT)
  • Database: PostgreSQL with SQLx offline mode for CI

License

Proprietary. All rights reserved.

Description
No description provided
Readme 849 MiB
Languages
Rust 88.2%
Cuda 7.7%
Python 1.3%
Shell 1.1%
PLpgSQL 0.8%
Other 0.8%