jgrusewski ab2133463e fix(dqn): SP1 Phase C — ε floor fix-up #2 (cold-start clamp pathology)
Smoke smoke-test-dr2bn (commit 19b008e1c) F1-NaN'd at step 240 — earlier
than pre-fix smoke smoke-test-xvzgk (step 890). The fix made things
worse, indicating the ε floor `(1e6 × isv).max(1e3)` is actively
destabilizing F1 startup.

Diagnosis: at fold boundary, ISV[H_S2_RMS_EMA_INDEX=96] and
ISV[Q_DIR_ABS_REF_INDEX=21] reset to 0 (per StateResetRegistry).
Formula `(1e6 × 0).max(1e3) = 1e3` makes max_abs aggressively narrow.
F1 startup gradients can have natural magnitudes > 1e3 (post-fold
Bellman-target shift); clamping them to ±1e3 destabilizes Adam EMAs,
which then drive cuBLAS GEMM accumulators into pathological inputs
that overflow → slot 26 + 32 NaN.

New formula: `1e6 × isv.max(1.0)` guarantees max_abs ≥ 1e6 regardless
of ISV state:
  - ISV = 0   → max_abs = 1e6 × max(0, 1.0) = 1e6
  - ISV = 0.5 → max_abs = 1e6 × max(0.5, 1.0) = 1e6
  - ISV = 2.0 → max_abs = 1e6 × max(2.0, 1.0) = 2e6
  - ISV = 100 → max_abs = 1e8

F0 no-op intent preserved (F0 inputs ≪ 1e6 in all states; ISV[96]≈1.0
for converged F0 → max_abs = 1e6, well above F0-typical |iqn_d_h_s2|
≤ ~10²). F1 startup gradients ≤ 1e6 are un-clipped.

The 1.0 ε floor is on the ISV multiplier (Invariant 1 carve-out per
`feedback_isv_for_adaptive_bounds`), not on the bound itself — bound
is still ISV-driven when ISV is meaningful (≥ 1.0).

Two edit sites:
- gpu_dqn_trainer.rs:6967 (apply_iqn_trunk_gradient, slot 26 path)
- gpu_dqn_trainer.rs:18631 (launch_cublas_backward_to, slot 32 path)

F0 regression to 35.24 still unsolved — separate investigation thread
within SP1 (no deferral; Phase B instrumentation timing impact suspected).
2026-04-30 02:16:45 +02:00

Foxhunt

Production HFT trading system in Rust.

Architecture

The workspace contains 32 crates organized as follows:

Core Libraries (16)

Crate Purpose
trading_engine Order processing, FIX 4.4, IB TWS, SIMD, RDTSC timing
risk VaR, Kelly, circuit breakers, kill switches, compliance
risk-data Risk data types and shared structures
trading-data Trading data types
ml DQN Rainbow, PPO, TFT, Mamba2, ensemble inference
ml-data ML data types and feature definitions
data Market data ingestion and storage
backtesting Replay engine, strategy tester
adaptive-strategy Ensemble execution, microstructure analysis
common Shared types, resilience, error handling
storage S3 and local model storage
model_loader Model serialization and loading
market-data Market data feed handlers
database PostgreSQL access layer (SQLx)
config Configuration management
tli CLI commands and tooling

Services (8)

Service Purpose
backtesting_service gRPC backtesting service
broker_gateway_service FIX routing, broker connectivity
trading_service Core trading operations
ml_training_service Model training orchestration
data_acquisition_service Market data acquisition
trading_agent_service Autonomous trading agents
api_gateway gRPC API gateway with auth
web-gateway Axum REST + WebSocket gateway

Frontend

web-dashboard/ -- React 19 + TypeScript + Vite + TradingView charts.

Building

# Check compilation (no PostgreSQL required)
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo check --workspace

# Run tests for a specific crate
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo test -p <crate> --lib

# Clippy
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo clippy --workspace

ML Models

Four production model architectures on Candle v0.9.1 with CUDA:

  • DQN Rainbow -- Deep Q-Network with prioritized replay, dueling heads, noisy nets
  • PPO -- Proximal Policy Optimization with GAE and LSTM policies
  • TFT -- Temporal Fusion Transformer for multi-horizon forecasting
  • Mamba2 -- State space model for sequence prediction

Each model has a standalone trainer and a UnifiedTrainable adapter for the hyperopt pipeline.

Infrastructure

  • Git: Gitea at git.fxhnt.ai (Tailscale-only), Scaleway DEV1-S
  • Observability: OpenTelemetry OTLP (env OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT)
  • Database: PostgreSQL with SQLx offline mode for CI

License

Proprietary. All rights reserved.

Description
No description provided
Readme 849 MiB
Languages
Rust 88.2%
Cuda 7.7%
Python 1.3%
Shell 1.1%
PLpgSQL 0.8%
Other 0.8%