jgrusewski b15bc71fb6 feat(rl): specialized wr-targeting LOSS aversion controller
The previous adaptive LOSS controller (rl_reward_clamp_controller) drove
LOSS toward 1.0 floor via observed L/W trade ratio, killing Q's loss
aversion and producing wr=0.27 trend-follower. The dd049d9a4 baseline
achieved wr=0.567 with LOSS=3.0 STATIC, but disabling adaptation
caused NaN at step 4 (other components depend on LOSS-driven signals).

Solution: build a SPECIALIZED ISV controller that drives LOSS toward
maintaining target wr, decoupled from observed L/W trade ratio.

New: rl_loss_aversion_controller.cu
- Single-thread Schulman bounded-step controller
- Input: wr_ema (slot 590, EMA of trade outcomes on done events)
- Target: wr_target (slot 591, bootstrap 0.55 — surfer)
- Output: LOSS clamp (slot 453)
- ±10% adjustment per fire, asymmetric dead-zone (loss aversion bias)
- Bounds [1.5, 5.0], sparse-aware (skips if wr_ema = 0)

Modified rl_reward_clamp_controller.cu:
- Added wr_ema update on done events (single source of truth alongside
  win/loss magnitude EMAs)
- LOSS slot 453 ownership transferred to rl_loss_aversion_controller

Local smoke (1000 steps, b=128, seed=16962):
- wr_ema trajectory: 0.32 → 0.42 → 0.53 → 0.49 (climbing toward 0.55)
- LOSS auto-adjusts: 4.71 → 4.38 → 4.29 → 3.52 (tightening as wr rises)
- Action entropy stable 2.0-2.2 (no collapse)
- Reward clamp confirmed active (r_min saturates at -LOSS)
- No NaN, completed_clean: true

Per pearl_loss_clamp_controls_entropy_stability: LOSS≥3.0 correlates
with high wr + stable entropy. Specialized controller maintains this
structural property regardless of observed trade ratio noise.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-28 19:22:10 +02:00

Foxhunt

Production HFT trading system in Rust.

Architecture

The workspace contains 32 crates organized as follows:

Core Libraries (16)

Crate Purpose
trading_engine Order processing, FIX 4.4, IB TWS, SIMD, RDTSC timing
risk VaR, Kelly, circuit breakers, kill switches, compliance
risk-data Risk data types and shared structures
trading-data Trading data types
ml DQN Rainbow, PPO, TFT, Mamba2, ensemble inference
ml-data ML data types and feature definitions
data Market data ingestion and storage
backtesting Replay engine, strategy tester
adaptive-strategy Ensemble execution, microstructure analysis
common Shared types, resilience, error handling
storage S3 and local model storage
model_loader Model serialization and loading
market-data Market data feed handlers
database PostgreSQL access layer (SQLx)
config Configuration management
tli CLI commands and tooling

Services (8)

Service Purpose
backtesting_service gRPC backtesting service
broker_gateway_service FIX routing, broker connectivity
trading_service Core trading operations
ml_training_service Model training orchestration
data_acquisition_service Market data acquisition
trading_agent_service Autonomous trading agents
api_gateway gRPC API gateway with auth
web-gateway Axum REST + WebSocket gateway

Frontend

web-dashboard/ -- React 19 + TypeScript + Vite + TradingView charts.

Building

# Check compilation (no PostgreSQL required)
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo check --workspace

# Run tests for a specific crate
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo test -p <crate> --lib

# Clippy
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo clippy --workspace

ML Models

Four production model architectures on Candle v0.9.1 with CUDA:

  • DQN Rainbow -- Deep Q-Network with prioritized replay, dueling heads, noisy nets
  • PPO -- Proximal Policy Optimization with GAE and LSTM policies
  • TFT -- Temporal Fusion Transformer for multi-horizon forecasting
  • Mamba2 -- State space model for sequence prediction

Each model has a standalone trainer and a UnifiedTrainable adapter for the hyperopt pipeline.

Infrastructure

  • Git: Gitea at git.fxhnt.ai (Tailscale-only), Scaleway DEV1-S
  • Observability: OpenTelemetry OTLP (env OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT)
  • Database: PostgreSQL with SQLx offline mode for CI

License

Proprietary. All rights reserved.

Description
No description provided
Readme 849 MiB
Languages
Rust 88.2%
Cuda 7.7%
Python 1.3%
Shell 1.1%
PLpgSQL 0.8%
Other 0.8%