jgrusewski d482efc416 fix(sp21): T2.2 Phase 8.4-fix — winner-concentration z-score separation (atomic)
v8 smoke (train-96wfk) confirmed win_conc=0.0000 across all 9 cycles
even when PF crossed 1.0. The Phase 8.2/8.4 threshold tweaks couldn't
fix it because the underlying formula `top_mean / all_mean` is
sign-unstable around `all_mean=0`. PER alpha boost path was dark for
any cold-start policy below PF=1 — exactly the regime where the
boost matters most.

Old:  if all_mean ≤ (0.01 * pnl_std).max(0.0) { return 0.0; }
      top_mean / all_mean
      → guard trips at PF≤1 → 0.0 (every v8 cycle)

New:  ((top_mean - all_mean) / pnl_std).max(0.0)
      → z-score separation: how many pnl_stds above the overall mean
        does the top decile sit? By construction top_mean ≥ all_mean,
        so separation is non-negative even when all_mean is negative.
      → bounded [0, ∞), scale-invariant, profitability-agnostic.

Expected v9 magnitudes (v8 cycle-1-like inputs):
  top_mean ≈ 5e-6, all_mean ≈ 1e-7, pnl_std ≈ 1.08e-5
  separation = (5e-6 - 1e-7) / 1.08e-5 ≈ 0.45
  Healthy PF>1 cycles likely 0.2..1.5 range.

Pearls honoured:
  - pearl_controller_anchors_isv_driven: pnl_std is the signal-driven
    scale anchor (replaces hardcoded all_mean denominator)
  - feedback_isv_for_adaptive_bounds: z-score formulation removes the
    hardcoded multiplier dependency that motivated 8.2 and 8.4's
    threshold adjustments
  - feedback_no_quickfixes: structural reformulation, not a threshold
    tweak (8.2 and 8.4 already showed threshold tweaks couldn't fix
    the sign-instability)

Verification:
  cargo check -p ml --features cuda  # clean

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 17:14:08 +02:00

Foxhunt

Production HFT trading system in Rust.

Architecture

The workspace contains 32 crates organized as follows:

Core Libraries (16)

Crate Purpose
trading_engine Order processing, FIX 4.4, IB TWS, SIMD, RDTSC timing
risk VaR, Kelly, circuit breakers, kill switches, compliance
risk-data Risk data types and shared structures
trading-data Trading data types
ml DQN Rainbow, PPO, TFT, Mamba2, ensemble inference
ml-data ML data types and feature definitions
data Market data ingestion and storage
backtesting Replay engine, strategy tester
adaptive-strategy Ensemble execution, microstructure analysis
common Shared types, resilience, error handling
storage S3 and local model storage
model_loader Model serialization and loading
market-data Market data feed handlers
database PostgreSQL access layer (SQLx)
config Configuration management
tli CLI commands and tooling

Services (8)

Service Purpose
backtesting_service gRPC backtesting service
broker_gateway_service FIX routing, broker connectivity
trading_service Core trading operations
ml_training_service Model training orchestration
data_acquisition_service Market data acquisition
trading_agent_service Autonomous trading agents
api_gateway gRPC API gateway with auth
web-gateway Axum REST + WebSocket gateway

Frontend

web-dashboard/ -- React 19 + TypeScript + Vite + TradingView charts.

Building

# Check compilation (no PostgreSQL required)
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo check --workspace

# Run tests for a specific crate
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo test -p <crate> --lib

# Clippy
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo clippy --workspace

ML Models

Four production model architectures on Candle v0.9.1 with CUDA:

  • DQN Rainbow -- Deep Q-Network with prioritized replay, dueling heads, noisy nets
  • PPO -- Proximal Policy Optimization with GAE and LSTM policies
  • TFT -- Temporal Fusion Transformer for multi-horizon forecasting
  • Mamba2 -- State space model for sequence prediction

Each model has a standalone trainer and a UnifiedTrainable adapter for the hyperopt pipeline.

Infrastructure

  • Git: Gitea at git.fxhnt.ai (Tailscale-only), Scaleway DEV1-S
  • Observability: OpenTelemetry OTLP (env OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT)
  • Database: PostgreSQL with SQLx offline mode for CI

License

Proprietary. All rights reserved.

Description
No description provided
Readme 849 MiB
Languages
Rust 88.2%
Cuda 7.7%
Python 1.3%
Shell 1.1%
PLpgSQL 0.8%
Other 0.8%