jgrusewski c0d3d7b2ff plan(dqn-v2): Plan 4 Task 2 GRN — decomposed into 2a/2b/2c with reality checks
After a first dispatch attempt of monolithic Task 2 (GRN ADOPT) was
correctly refused with a thorough scope assessment, this revision
records the decomposition and the structural facts that drove it:

1. layout_fingerprint_seed() only fingerprints ISV slots, not
   param-tensor layout. The "fingerprint will auto-update" assumption
   in the original Task 2 spec was wrong for param-tensor reshuffles.
2. compute_param_sizes has 86 tensors (docstring saying 42 is stale).
   Inserting GRN's 9 sub-tensors shifts 82 downstream tensors and
   98 padded_byte_offset call sites.
3. At least 12 kernels consume h_s2 expecting ReLU non-negativity.
   GRN's LayerNorm output is zero-mean (signed). Per-consumer
   verification needed before swap.
4. crates/ml-supervised::tft::gated_residual is incompatible as a
   port: different formula (sigmoid gate, not GLU split) and
   incompatible tensor abstraction. New CUDA kernels from scratch.

Decomposition:
- Task 2a (research, no code): audit h_s2 consumers for ReLU vs
  LayerNorm semantics. Output: per-consumer table.
- Task 2b (small, checkpoint break): extend fingerprint seed to
  include param-tensor names + sizes. Pearl-aligned: complete
  fingerprint coverage rather than partial.
- Task 2c (large, checkpoint break): GRN kernels + 98 call-site
  migration + h_s2 consumer shims (per 2a). Blocked on 2a+2b.

Recommended order updated to thread 2a → 2b → 2c. Tasks 1, 6, 3
remain independent of 2c and can land in parallel where useful.
Pearl rules section added documenting the safety constraints
applied throughout the plan.

No code changes. Plan-doc only.
2026-04-25 11:11:13 +02:00

Foxhunt

Production HFT trading system in Rust.

Architecture

The workspace contains 32 crates organized as follows:

Core Libraries (16)

Crate Purpose
trading_engine Order processing, FIX 4.4, IB TWS, SIMD, RDTSC timing
risk VaR, Kelly, circuit breakers, kill switches, compliance
risk-data Risk data types and shared structures
trading-data Trading data types
ml DQN Rainbow, PPO, TFT, Mamba2, ensemble inference
ml-data ML data types and feature definitions
data Market data ingestion and storage
backtesting Replay engine, strategy tester
adaptive-strategy Ensemble execution, microstructure analysis
common Shared types, resilience, error handling
storage S3 and local model storage
model_loader Model serialization and loading
market-data Market data feed handlers
database PostgreSQL access layer (SQLx)
config Configuration management
tli CLI commands and tooling

Services (8)

Service Purpose
backtesting_service gRPC backtesting service
broker_gateway_service FIX routing, broker connectivity
trading_service Core trading operations
ml_training_service Model training orchestration
data_acquisition_service Market data acquisition
trading_agent_service Autonomous trading agents
api_gateway gRPC API gateway with auth
web-gateway Axum REST + WebSocket gateway

Frontend

web-dashboard/ -- React 19 + TypeScript + Vite + TradingView charts.

Building

# Check compilation (no PostgreSQL required)
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo check --workspace

# Run tests for a specific crate
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo test -p <crate> --lib

# Clippy
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo clippy --workspace

ML Models

Four production model architectures on Candle v0.9.1 with CUDA:

  • DQN Rainbow -- Deep Q-Network with prioritized replay, dueling heads, noisy nets
  • PPO -- Proximal Policy Optimization with GAE and LSTM policies
  • TFT -- Temporal Fusion Transformer for multi-horizon forecasting
  • Mamba2 -- State space model for sequence prediction

Each model has a standalone trainer and a UnifiedTrainable adapter for the hyperopt pipeline.

Infrastructure

  • Git: Gitea at git.fxhnt.ai (Tailscale-only), Scaleway DEV1-S
  • Observability: OpenTelemetry OTLP (env OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT)
  • Database: PostgreSQL with SQLx offline mode for CI

License

Proprietary. All rights reserved.

Description
No description provided
Readme 849 MiB
Languages
Rust 88.2%
Cuda 7.7%
Python 1.3%
Shell 1.1%
PLpgSQL 0.8%
Other 0.8%