jgrusewski f7a91d906d feat(dqn-v2): D.5 soft fold-boundary transitions via bootstrap-write + EMA
SoftReset registry category (isv_grad_balance_targets, isv_grad_scale_limit)
implemented via bootstrap-write + existing kernel's EMA. CPU writes bootstrap
values (1.0 for targets, 2.0 for limit) at fold boundary; grad_balance_isv_update
kernel's adaptive-rate EMA (alpha in [0.01, 0.30]) converges from bootstrap
toward observed values over subsequent epochs (implicit decay_bars via EMA time
constant).

Option A chosen (minimal): the existing grad_balance_isv_update kernel already
uses adaptive-rate EMA — not a hard-write — so bootstrap-at-fold-boundary is
sufficient. The EMA time constant ~1/alpha provides the decay, satisfying the
decay_bars=500 intent without a new ISV slot (Option B rejected as over-
engineered: new ISV slot + kernel change for no material behavioral improvement).

Changes:
- training_loop.rs::reset_named_state: add dispatch arms for both SoftReset
  entries, writing bootstrap constants (CPU-born input, not adaptive output;
  complies with spec §4.C.6 GPU-drives-CPU-reads)
- trainer/mod.rs: fold-boundary reset loop now calls both fold_reset_entries()
  and soft_reset_entries(); stale "handled separately (Plan 2)" comment removed
- smoke_tests/soft_reset.rs: 4 CPU-only tests verify registry classification,
  entry count, mutual exclusivity from fold_reset, and bootstrap constant invariants
- docs/dqn-wire-up-audit.md: D.5 SoftReset dispatch row added

No CPU-side adaptive computation. No new ISV slot. No behavioral change to
training beyond writing known-good bootstrap values at fold boundaries.

Plan 2 Task 4. Spec §4.D.5.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-24 20:08:36 +02:00

Foxhunt

Production HFT trading system in Rust.

Architecture

The workspace contains 32 crates organized as follows:

Core Libraries (16)

Crate Purpose
trading_engine Order processing, FIX 4.4, IB TWS, SIMD, RDTSC timing
risk VaR, Kelly, circuit breakers, kill switches, compliance
risk-data Risk data types and shared structures
trading-data Trading data types
ml DQN Rainbow, PPO, TFT, Mamba2, ensemble inference
ml-data ML data types and feature definitions
data Market data ingestion and storage
backtesting Replay engine, strategy tester
adaptive-strategy Ensemble execution, microstructure analysis
common Shared types, resilience, error handling
storage S3 and local model storage
model_loader Model serialization and loading
market-data Market data feed handlers
database PostgreSQL access layer (SQLx)
config Configuration management
tli CLI commands and tooling

Services (8)

Service Purpose
backtesting_service gRPC backtesting service
broker_gateway_service FIX routing, broker connectivity
trading_service Core trading operations
ml_training_service Model training orchestration
data_acquisition_service Market data acquisition
trading_agent_service Autonomous trading agents
api_gateway gRPC API gateway with auth
web-gateway Axum REST + WebSocket gateway

Frontend

web-dashboard/ -- React 19 + TypeScript + Vite + TradingView charts.

Building

# Check compilation (no PostgreSQL required)
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo check --workspace

# Run tests for a specific crate
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo test -p <crate> --lib

# Clippy
SQLX_OFFLINE=true cargo clippy --workspace

ML Models

Four production model architectures on Candle v0.9.1 with CUDA:

  • DQN Rainbow -- Deep Q-Network with prioritized replay, dueling heads, noisy nets
  • PPO -- Proximal Policy Optimization with GAE and LSTM policies
  • TFT -- Temporal Fusion Transformer for multi-horizon forecasting
  • Mamba2 -- State space model for sequence prediction

Each model has a standalone trainer and a UnifiedTrainable adapter for the hyperopt pipeline.

Infrastructure

  • Git: Gitea at git.fxhnt.ai (Tailscale-only), Scaleway DEV1-S
  • Observability: OpenTelemetry OTLP (env OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT)
  • Database: PostgreSQL with SQLx offline mode for CI

License

Proprietary. All rights reserved.

Description
No description provided
Readme 849 MiB
Languages
Rust 88.2%
Cuda 7.7%
Python 1.3%
Shell 1.1%
PLpgSQL 0.8%
Other 0.8%